Michael Bloomberg ‘ still looking at ’ a presidential run

He would be the first President to remove your 2A Rights, he's only running because he flipped Virginia with his money .


Bob Lee Swagger said "They'll have to wait till he takes the podium, several lines into his speech. That way he'd be completely static, obviously at his most exposed."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sean the Nailer
Hey Mike, all your friends at Snipers Hide got together and bought you something

1573250713956.png
 
Yeah, and he can look at my taint for all I care. The saddest thing is what it says about the US when an elite piece of shit like Bloomberg could even be considered for the POTUS. How far that office has fallen in a short 40 or so years.
 
good video. there is definitely an aspect of strategically making a shock statement so that we accept "lesser" infringements with relief......but personally I still think that in 1-5 years, it is coming on the federal level.



That has always been their mode of operations. The so-called 'long game'. That is the reason why shit like tranny storytime and other nonsense exists... To get our children to accept these abhorrences as "normal" and rebel against their elders.
 
doesn't this bloomberg nazi have dual citizenship? I know that Schiff, Wasserman-Schultz, Gabby Giffords, and a few other far-left, anti-Constitution radicals have dual loyalties. I doubt if the SCOTUS ever determined whether someone who chose to carry foreign citizenship should be disqualified from office.
 
doesn't this bloomberg nazi have dual citizenship? I know that Schiff, Wasserman-Schultz, Gabby Giffords, and a few other far-left, anti-Constitution radicals have dual loyalties. I doubt if the SCOTUS ever determined whether someone who chose to carry foreign citizenship should be disqualified from office.

I am not a Constitutional scholar, but

- I can't even begin to believe that our Founding Fathers would even consider the fact

- that someone who was a citizen of a foreign country

- could become the president of this country.


On the other hand, they probably thought "shall not be infringed" was pretty clear also.
 
This guy is an egomaniac. He will rape the DNC and try to push his agenda. But I doubt even the Demwits will get behind him to support his policies. Money can only take him so far. "HE" is now on point, not his money. He'll find that to be a very big difference. VA was bought, he won't be able to buy America.
 
Being from NY...

If trump is going to loose (god forbid)

As much as he’s a POS if it’s either him or one of the other dems currently running, I’d take him.

He a business man at heart, maybe he wouldn’t take all our rights away AND totally fuck the country, like the other dems will.
 
Being from NY...

If trump is going to loose (god forbid)

As much as he’s a POS if it’s either him or one of the other dems currently running, I’d take him.

He a business man at heart, maybe he wouldn’t take all our rights away AND totally fuck the country, like the other dems will.

Mike would take your guns away first second in office no questions asked more so then the other asshats.
 
Being from NY...

If trump is going to loose (god forbid)

As much as he’s a POS if it’s either him or one of the other dems currently running, I’d take him.

He a business man at heart, maybe he wouldn’t take all our rights away AND totally fuck the country, like the other dems will.


Did you notice who he supported in the VA elections? He'd grab every firearm and probably a few slingshots too.
 
seriously. KNOW THE CANDIDATE BEFORE PULLING THE LEVER

Here are Bloomberg’s top ten gun controls:
  1. Universal Background Checks—Bloomberg’s support of universal background checks was made clear following the December 14, 2012, attack on Sandy Hook Elementary School. In the aftermath of that attack, On the Issues quoted him saying, “You have an issue where 90% of the public, 80% of NRA members even, say that they think we should have reasonable checks before people are allowed to buy guns–they all support the 2nd Amendment, as do I.” The problem with Bloomberg’s push at that time was that the Sandy Hook attacker stole his guns, so no amount of point-of-purchase gun control would have stopped his attack. The problem with his continuation of the same push now is that nearly every mass shooter of the last decade acquired his guns via a background check, so expanding checks to cover private sales would not have prevented the attacks.
  2. Banning ‘Assault Weapons’—Bloomberg has long advocated a ban on “assault weapons,” but he admits securing the ban is an uphill battle because the guns are rarely used in crime when compared with other firearms. USA Today reportedBloomberg’s push for a ban on “the manufacture and sale” of “assault weapons” following Sandy Hook. But in 2017 he told the New York Times, “You can have a ban on assault weapons. But assault weapons kill 400 people a year. They get a lot of press. But its 400 vs. 31,000 with handguns.”
  3. More Gun Trafficking Legislation—Bloomberg was a trendsetter in the habit of blaming out-of-state gun laws for the crime in New York City. Laws against gun trafficking have been a go-to for him as a result. A problem for Bloomberg and other leftists is that gun trafficking is already illegal, and ATF background check 4473 makes clear that buying a gun for a prohibited person is not allowed.
  4. ‘High Capacity’ Magazine Ban—On June 25, 2011, the Patch reportedBloomberg’s support of a “ban on the sale or transfer of high-capacity ammunition magazines.”
  5. War on Gun Shows—Bloomberg supports closing the so-called “gun show loophole,” which is liberal-speak for criminalizing private gun sales.
  6. Supports an Expansion of the Prohibited Purchasers’ List–In the wake of the Sandy Hook attack, CBS News reported Bloomberg’s support for adding the “No Fly” list to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System’s prohibited purchasers’ list. Bloomberg did not mention that the “No Fly” list had nothing to do with the Sandy Hook attack and would not have hindered, much less prevented, the shooting.
  7. Supports Red Flag Laws—Bloomberg supports laws that allow judges to issue orders to seize firearms. One of the groups he funds–Everytown for Gun Safety–has spent millions in the last months alone pushing for a Red Flag Law. CNBC reported on Everytown’s “digital and TV ads” focused on pushing “Congress to require tougher background checks for gun sales along with strong red-flag laws, which are meant to take firearms away from those deemed a threat to themselves or others.”
  8. Opposes National Reciprocity—Bloomberg’s Everytown opposes a national reciprocity rule where concealed carry licenses are recognized state-to-state like driver’s licenses. Politico reported Everytown’s pledge to spend up to $25 million in the 2018 election cycle to defeat candidates who supported such reciprocity.
  9. Opposes Campus Carry—In 2018, CSPAN reported Bloomberg’s opposition to campus carry for self-defense in New Hampshire. Bloomberg-funded Moms Demand Action fights campus carry when a state legislature gives it consideration. For example, the Bloomberg-funded gun control group fought against campus carry for self-defense when Florida legislators were considering it, and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that Moms Demand delivered thousands of signatures to oppose campus carry when it was being considered by the Georgia legislature.
  10. Opposes Armed Teachers—Bloomberg-funded Moms Demand Action also opposes allowing teachers to be armed to shoot back if under attack. The group spent $200,000 on an ad campaign designed to dissuade Florida legislators from allowing teachers to be armed for self-defense following the Parkland school shooting.
 
Last edited:
Don’t forget we don’t have a choice... If trump doesn’t win

Warren
Biden
Bloom

Guns or no guns bloom is the best of the worst for the country as a whole.

He won’t sell our souls to China and Mexico like the rest will

From the post above..he didn’t say anything that wasn’t said in the last dem debate.
 
Don’t forget we don’t have a choice... If trump doesn’t win

Warren
Biden
Bloom

Guns or no guns bloom is the best of the worst for the country as a whole.

He won’t sell our souls to China and Mexico like the rest will

From the post above..he didn’t say anything that wasn’t said in the last dem debate.

Bloomberg would be the worst of the options for the country & for us.
Evil and smart enough not to crash the country before destroy all our freedoms in a hurry.
He would rally the elites in this country to roll out his vision that the rich folks have a "right" to tell everyone what to do and the peons need to shut up, know their place and do as they are told.

I'd take Warren any day over him as she would probably crash the place to the ground before being able to get our freedoms taken away.
She'll be so busy trying to wage war on those with money and them turning on her that there might be a chance for the whole thing to collapse before our rights get taken away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darayavaus
He would be the first President to remove your 2A Rights, he's only running because he flipped Virginia with his money .


Bob Lee Swagger said "They'll have to wait till he takes the podium, several lines into his speech. That way he'd be completely static, obviously at his most exposed."
Being from NY...

If trump is going to loose (god forbid)

As much as he’s a POS if it’s either him or one of the other dems currently running, I’d take him.

He a business man at heart, maybe he wouldn’t take all our rights away AND totally fuck the country, like the other dems will.

Y’all are fucking crazy! He ain’t taking shit from me or my homies. Gov didn’t grant me these rights, God did. What men didn’t grant they can’t take away.
 
I don't think Bloomberg would have a chance to win the Democrat nomination, he's basically a trump that hates guns and freedom.
The Communists aren't going to want to vote for him and the "moderate" wing of the Communist party is pretty small right now.