Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OP is too dumb to be a troll.Is this thread worthy of the Legendary Thread? I think so for the sextant, new measurement units, and the February as Annual Mil vs MOA month.
Disqualification reasons. OP is a troll.
What say ye?
You really are a special kind of stupid.If someone could give an answer that had some type of intelligent response, then maybe we wouldn't be having this conversation. I have been waiting this entire time for someone to post something along the lines of this. But no.. everything but this. That's it.. that simple. This was the first thing I learned and I practiced it.. not very practical compared to the tools we have and I would never bust this out at a match. So if your argument is, who gives a shit, I use Mil because of whatever random shit you want to tell yourself, then that's ok by me. My first Vortex Razor was MOA because I was like, who would use Mil, that's stupid.. Then I went to a match and was like.. ok.. I get it.
1 MOA spreads about 1″ per 100 yards. (actually 1.047″)
1 MOA is a different size at different distances, 8″ at 800 yards is still just 1 MOA.
This:
(Distance to target in yards) / (100) = inches per MOA at that distance
(Number of inches of adjustment needed) / (inches per MOA at that distance) = MOA adjustment
(Number of clicks per 1 MOA on scope) x (MOA adjustment) = adjustment in clicks on scope
Mils:
One Mil's Size at Various Distances (in Yards)
One Mil's Size at Various Distances (in Meters)
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 3.6" 7.2" 10.8" 14.4" 18.0" 21.6" 25.2" 28.8" 32.4" 36.0"
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 10cm 20cm 30cm 40cm 50cm 60cm 70cm 80cm 90cm 1 Meter
and This:
20 mm/50 m = 0.4 mrad, or 4 clicks with a 1/10 mrad adjustment scope.
50 mm/1000 m = 0.05 mrad, or 1 click with a 0.05 mrad adjustment scope.
There are literally thousands of references to this all over the place and you guys have no clue what I'm talking about? Kinda hard to believe. This has to be some kind of joke.
How far are you from Mooseye Rd.OMFG
Is this guy for real?
Where do you live? If you live anywhere close to Ohio I'll meet you at Rayner's Range for a schooling session.
Also one other thing. As a machinist I don't use inches. I use milliinches. 0.001" or a thou. Everything I measure is done in thousandths or tenths of thousandths (0.0001" pronounced as a tenth). Every measurement I talk about is in terms of thousandths. For example what I am cutting tonight. 3.369-3.371". Said as three point three seventy +/- a thou.
Here I will do some comparisons as well.
0.0001"@1" = 1/10 mil
0.001" @1" = 1mil.
1 head @1000 head lengths = 1 mil
1 light year @ 1000 light years = 1 mil
1 squirrel ball @1000 squirrel balls = 1mil
1 opossum ball @1000 opossum balls = 1mil
1 mile @1000 miles = 1mil.
So you are telling me this guy ( Ryan Cleckner is a former Army Ranger sniper and instructor with the 1st Ranger Battalion of the US Army) is a complete idiot and the other 100 references I have found with MOA use inches and Mil uses meters and there is actual math you can use? I you really don't know this, please watch both videos, you might learn something.
What is Minute of Angle?
Minute of Angle (MOA) is an angular measurement, used often in long range shooting, that is 1/60th of one degree of a circle.www.nssf.org
one flaw in your thinking regarding referencing metric and imperial, Frank mentioned it earlier, you are NOT down range measuring the difference. the reticle, whether mil or moa is a calibrated ruler. in the case of moa, it is known that some manufacturers don't spec their turrets to 1.047 and leave it at 1 inch.
the real question you should be asking yourself is why do you want to convert something from an angle into a linear figure, doesn't make any sense. if under pressure can you think on the fly to make the correction you need? most probably not.
and referencing Ryan Cleckner, you might want to watch this video where he is using a mil scope and trying to convert to moa, cause he thinks in moa, to make his adjustments while zeroing. not having a go a Ryan at all, he knows his stuff. he has been shooting moa most of his life and only changed to mil in the not to distant past going off this video.
please stop flogging a dead horse. people will either entertain you or ignore you. don't be surprised if you are the only one left talking to yourself in this thread...
Sort of... Like I said it only matters for ranging. If you're shooting somewhere with a predetermined distance to target the math doesn't mean squat... Mils are mils and minutes are minutes.Wow, all the sudden we have a logical discussion going here.
I'm on my phone... Hard to see... I have an answer but I'm going to keep my mouth shut in hopes that the point is understood.Okay. Target is the bright dot. Let’s say my point of impact was where the crosshairs are. How many inches low and left did I miss?View attachment 7558301
Bonus points if you can tell me what day I took that picture on. Hint there is no glare on lens. No optical illusions going onI'm on my phone... Hard to see... I have an answer but I'm going to keep my mouth shut in hopes that the point is understood.
Mike
12/21/2020Bonus points if you can tell me what day I took that picture on. Hint there is no glare on lens. No optical illusions going on
Similar event wrong day. Good guess12/21/2020
Mike
I was just trying to make the simple point that MOA is easier for me to do quickly vs MIL and there is math involved. The formulas are the same, you just have to have a constant value (meters or inches) when applying them. If you want to convert one to the other, then there is more math.No he is not an idiot. I do not think you are either, but it seems that you have ingrained a shortcut into your calculations that is confounding the issue. I have just finished reading this entire thread from start to finish. I can sense your frustration, but I suspect that you are too closely associating meters to MRAD's and MOA to yards. Also, everyone dog piling is probably obfuscating the issue a bit.
Please review starting at the 5:55 mark for a couple of minutes then move to the 8:47 mark in the video link you provided. He is utilizing the MRADs to discuss shooting in yards without converting from MOA's to Mil's.
Then see 15:30 wherein he discusses that mils and MOA's and mils are both being angular units of measurement.
MRAD is a unit of angle. MOA is a unit of angle. The unit of distance that you are measuring is abstract.
Perhaps it will help redefining the terminology.
MRAD = .0572958 degrees <-derived from the Formula (360 /(2 * pi)/1000
MOA = .0166666 degrees <- derived from the formula (1/60)
.0572958 degrees x unit = 1/1000th of the unit in distance.
Stealing Cleckner's example from the video,
Lets assume that your target is an Elk. The Elk is now your unit. The Elk is 1 milliradian tall in your scope. You are 1,000 Elk heights away from your target. If you believe an Elk is 57 inches tall. You are 1,000 (57 inch) units away. You can convert to the Elk being 57,000 inches away. Dividing by 36 inches will give you 1,583 yards to the Elk. If you shot at the Elk and missed by a single MRAD in your scope, then you know that you missed center by one length of Elk, being 57 inches.
If the Elk is 5 milliradians tall in your scope, then the Elk is 5/1000 Elk Heights away from you. Which will mean the Elk is 316.66 yards away. This of course assumes that your estimation of height is correct. If you shot at the Elk and your POI was single MRAD from your POA, in your scope, then you know that you missed your POA by 1/5th of an Elk, or 11.4 inches.
(Someone please check my math. Its late and I have been drinking.)
The shortcut I think you are using, and correct me if I am wrong, is that you are automatically converting everything to inches, then attempting to convert back to Mils or MOAs to make adjustments. I would argue that this is unnecessary. Simply convert the MOAs to Mils if that is your goal and skip the conversion of distance.
Couldn’t*I am beginning to realize this! You guys are so defensive!!
I could care less if you use MOA or Mil.
I don't think one is better than the other.
I don't think MOA is more of a precise adjustment (even though it is, just really not enough to make a difference at most yardage)
I use Mil myself since I started PRS for the easy of interaction with others. When I'm on the range and start spitting out numbers like.. 3in low @ 600yard.. need to come up 1/2 MOA.. the dude shooting with me is like WTF are you talking about.
I'm not talking about the practical applications of either.. Once you get past the initial calculations, neither MOA or Mil are different, they are just reference numbers based off of MATH!
thank all of you for entertaining this beat to death horse.
The only math involved in mils IF you MUST relate it to a linear distance, which you really don’t and shouldn’t ever until you’re measure the group size and then you’re using a linear measuring tool anyway since you don’t measure group size with your scope, is shifting the decimal. I don’t even consider that math.I was just trying to make the simple point that MOA is easier for me to do quickly vs MIL and there is math involved. The formulas are the same, you just have to have a constant value (meters or inches) when applying them. If you want to convert one to the other, then there is more math.
That's it what all this has turned into.. not sure how.. but it did
You are focusing on the definition of the thing and not the practical hands on USEAGE of the thing.
If your dope is written in mils/moa
Your corrections are measured and given in mils/moa
Your leads are held in mils/moa
There is ZERO need to backtrack into inches.
Your reticle is calibrated directly to your dials.
You see a miss and think "that's 2 feet left".
Your supposed to measure with your reticle in real time....your 2.5 mils left....your 9 minutes left.
If you are using feet and inches....YOUR DOING IT WRONG.
Your focused on the definition if a Mil being 3.6".....that information is there for you the layman to visual it. ITS NOT THE USEAGE.
You dont read a speed limit sign and do a bunch of math backtracking inches per second traveled. You speed up till the speedometer reads 35mph for that street and move on.
You have a target at 500 yards/meters. You have your dope in mils/moa for 500 yards/meters. You dial (or hold it). You hit or miss....upon the miss you measure with your reticle in mil/moa and apply it as needed. Done. No inches anywhere.
The gun and scope doesnt care if you call a target 200 meters or 219 yards away. It only cares that you need 0.7 mils to hit it. Done.
The reason you're getting shitted on like there's no tomorrow is because you think that we're idiots and that you came here like Moses down from the mountain to teach us a revelation.Thank you for a descent comment that makes sense. I agree there are easier tools to use, but this was the foundation I was talking about that everyone says doesn't exist. Army Snipers use Mil so I'm not sure he is a MOA guy. It is referencing MOA because most hunter use MOA and they don't have crazy reticles like our 2-4K scopes do. This video is 10 years old so the scope craze was just getting going.
But but but I think we got a break through here!!!! People literally don't know this is a thing?
I agree, I'm done with this man.. if people don't want get it, they don't get it and it really doesn't matter to them.
I use MOR.
Minute of radian.
It's why I'm better than everyone else.
I was saving this one for my last comment.. What triggered this topic my head was this FRONT PAGE ARTICLE ON THIS SITE
Notice how he is "converting everything from yds to mil adjustments? My entire point made here. If you were using MOA adjustments, there would be less backend math involved. He did it for you so that's what make this so great.
This is an awesome tool and would recommend trying what this gentlemen has put together one day on the range.
Alternate Range Weaponized Math
Weaponized Math developed by Marc Taylor has changed the way we gather data for our rifles. Doping your rifle has never been so easy.www.snipershide.com
I now really want to see a scope manufacturer offer 1/8 & 1/16 mil or 1/5 & 1/10 moa.
The ONLY thing fucking funnier than the AMAZINGLY lonnnggggggg list of things you don't know is the list of things you THINK you "know". Congratulations?!?Thank you for a descent comment that makes sense. I agree there are easier tools to use, but this was the foundation I was talking about that everyone says doesn't exist. Army Snipers use Mil so I'm not sure he is a MOA guy. It is referencing MOA because most hunter use MOA and they don't have crazy reticles like our 2-4K scopes do. This video is 10 years old so the scope craze was just getting going.
But but but I think we got a break through here!!!! People literally don't know this is a thing?
I agree, I'm done with this man.. if people don't want get it, they don't get it and it really doesn't matter to them.
I was saving this one for my last comment.. What triggered this topic my head was this FRONT PAGE ARTICLE ON THIS SITE
Notice how he is "converting everything from yds to mil adjustments? My entire point made here. If you were using MOA adjustments, there would be less backend math involved. He did it for you so that's what make this so great.
This is an awesome tool and would recommend trying what this gentlemen has put together one day on the range.
Alternate Range Weaponized Math
Weaponized Math developed by Marc Taylor has changed the way we gather data for our rifles. Doping your rifle has never been so easy.www.snipershide.com
That's pretty much about 90% of the Internet's firearm content creators.I think this is what is going on:
Cargo cult programming - Wikipedia
There are a group of people who do things because they have seen others do it, but have no understanding of why it's being done that way.
This was in that Stop the debate article.
But I “think” in Inches:"
Ya. makes sense, just converter one thing too another has nothing to do thing inches or distance in is calculation. You did that calculation separate.
6.3Mils x 3.43 = 21.6 MOA
21.6 MOA / 3.43 = 6.3 Mils
If you run with the target size x 100.. it's make this pretty damn easy which is my point again. And why do we have to use 27.7 boys and girls.. because it's metric
Mils
Range in Yards = Target size Inches x 27.7 / Mils Observed
TMOA
Range in Yards = Target size Inches x 95.5 / TMOA Observed
IPHY / SMOA
Range in Yards = Target size Inches x 100 / SMOA Observed
I guess you never taken statistic based calculusThat's pretty much about 90% of the Internet's firearm content creators.
My outfit has an office in the Fort Walton Beach area. I am sitting here hoping to hell this isn't one of my guys!Are you sure you’re an engineer? If so, please give me the name of the company so I can never use them.
No reply @chickon1 ?Okay. Target is the bright dot. Let’s say my point of impact was where the crosshairs are. How many inches low and left did I miss?View attachment 7558301
You're a fucking MORON. There are people here that have forgotten more mathematics than you will ever live to learn.I guess you never taken statistic based calculus
For statistical thinking, what’s needed instead of quadratics and factoring is the incorporation of covariates. This can be as simple as the linear function with two inputs, z = a + bx + cy. This general-purpose form—extended often to more than two variables but remaining linear—is the workhorse of statistical modeling. It’s a first representation of what might be called complexity that more than one variable can play a role.
A powerful way of thinking about functions like z = a + bx + cy is to ask how the output changes when either of the inputs, x or y, is changed.