We’ve all watched it, many times. So what do YOU think he said?No, I’m sorry, but that’s not what he said at all. I watched the video.
And again, what is different about partial birth abortion vs infanticide?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We’ve all watched it, many times. So what do YOU think he said?No, I’m sorry, but that’s not what he said at all. I watched the video.
Not exactly. Its amazing this is what you got out of my statement.Should think like I do and everything would be fine.
I think he was just making a joke. I could be wrong but that’s how I took it. ??Not exactly. Its amazing this is what you got out of my statement.
Not exactly. Its amazing this is what you got out of my statement.
I think you are right. lolI think he was just making a joke.
If you read my other posts in this thread you will see that I am amazing in my ability to take a number of longer paragraphs and condense the entirety of their complex meaning into a condensed, pithy, comment on what would make the world better or what is subliminally ntended by the original poster.
I stare at goats and make them weep.
You aren't perfect at it, but you are still pretty good.If you read my other posts in this thread you will see that I am amazing in my ability to take a number of longer paragraphs and condense the entirety of their complex meaning into a condensed, pithy, comment on what would make the world better or what is subliminally intended by the original poster.
I stare at goats and make them weep.
Sometimes these threads need to be interupted by going out to shoot.
If you read my other posts in this thread you will see that I am amazing in my ability to take a number of longer paragraphs and condense the entirety of their complex meaning into a trite, pithy, comment on what would make the world better or what is subliminally intended by the original poster.
I stare at goats and make them weep.
Sometimes these threads need to be interupted by going out to shoot.
Make things worse by having 5 or 6 different Parties on the ballot, and then get back to me about how this is all 'Better'. I'll wait.
You would have to make one more change to make it really work for the people
You would also have to add Ranked Choice Voting if you had 4 5 or 6 + parties to vote for
I am with @armorpl8chikn,
Oh, and this is a interesting article.
Regardless of my position on this subject, a wall always seemed like campaign rhetoric to me...
I could be wrong...
"Mexico may not have paid for the president’s wall, but the country has, in effect, become Mr. Trump’s immigration police force. Mexico itself has become the wall."
![]()
Opinion | Trump: ‘I’m Using Mexico’ (Published 2019)
The country itself has become the wall. This has to change.www.nytimes.com
We don't need more choices. There's only one real party to support!
![]()
I'm all in...except for Gary Johnson.
I voted for Bob Barr in 2008.
I'm all in...except for Gary Johnson.
I voted for Bob Barr in 2008.
Voting Libertarian party pretty much just means you want the Democrats to win, but you want to be able to act all superior about "I voted my conscience".
Like it or not, REALITY is there is only two sides and sitting on the fence means you help the one that is most against you win.
Nationally, I agree. I vote libertarian often in local races when R’s run unopposed by D’s.Voting Libertarian party pretty much just means you want the Democrats to win, but you want to be able to act all superior about "I voted my conscience".
Like it or not, REALITY is there is only two sides and sitting on the fence means you help the one that is most against you win.
Sometimes in politicians there's only one side. Would you have voted for the Republican Party in 2016 had Jeb "Please Clap" Bush had been the nominee? Would you really think voting for Bush would have protected you and the country from Clinton and the Democrats? People should try to get informed as they possibly can and yes vote with their conscience. It's been many conservatives willingness to vote for anyone with an (R) after their name that's allowed RINO establishment types and Neocons to run the GOP and along with the establishment allies in the Democrats run the country against the interests of ordinary Americans for so long.
Your statement is pretty much completely wrong in my opinion.
In the 2016 elections you had 2 choices. Hillary Clinton or whoever was on the Republican Ticket. and ANY choice other than the person on the republican ticket was essentially a vote for Hillary Clinton. So yes, I would have voted for whoever was on that ticket unless they were worse than Hillary Clinton (who is a hard act to follow). Any of the candidates on the republican primary list would have been at least somewhat better for our freedoms and gun rights that Hillary who would have immediately launched an all out war on them.
It's specifically because lots of "conservatives" will only vote if they get the perfect candidate but the communists will vote for anyone as long as they are a party member, that we are loosing ground. You will NOT find a politician running for national office that is perfect or good, sorry, won't happen. They won't get to that point without having paid their dues.
A prime example of this is VA
The Communists went out and voted, even if their candidates were pretty bad. Too many folks on the "good" side, didn't bother to vote, or "voted their conscience" and so the communists won the day and now are going full steam ahead.
I'm sorry to break it to you, but until a major collapse and rebuilding, politics in this country is going to be a dirty business of getting the best you can.
Interesting graph.
While I see it's conclusions there is something missing.
What is an example of extreme "right" government in the last 100 years?
R
This is another thing I have been saying for like 20 years and no body seems to get it - we have divided ourselves into Red and Blue and all the Red folks attack anyone who didn't vote Red and all the Blue folks attack anyone who didn't vote Blue. I was chastised by Left Leaning folks for not voting for Hillary in 2016. I said she's a shit candidate and I'm not voting for shit candidates. Well, they voted for her even though they knew she was shit because she was Blue and only for that reason. The hated her fucking guts but held their nose and voted for her anyway.Sometimes in politicians there's only one side. Would you have voted for the Republican Party in 2016 had Jeb "Please Clap" Bush had been the nominee? Would you really think voting for Bush would have protected you and the country from Clinton and the Democrats? People should try to get informed as they possibly can and yes vote with their conscience. It's been many conservatives willingness to vote for anyone with an (R) after their name that's allowed RINO establishment types and Neocons to run the GOP and along with the establishment allies in the Democrats run the country against the interests of ordinary Americans for so long.
Which leads me to my point.Not in our government.... but....
ISIS and the Caliphate.
Not in our government.... but....
ISIS and the Caliphate.
We won't get better candidates if we prove to The Bosses that we support their shit candidate no matter how bad. This happens on both sides - Red or Blue. We get shit candidates because we *vote* for shit candidates.
VooDoo
Its like an arsonist who is used to setting small fires and putting them out, or at least not being burned by their own fire...... they havent been burned or lost control of their animal.......yet.....I agree. You could also likely put some of the ME totalitarian theocracies in the same category.
Which I mentioned in a previous post. Its interesting how much of the left have aligned themselves to this. Do they not realize how quickly this alliance could turn on them?
Which leads me to my point.
It doesn't/hasn't existed in this country.
If we understand this then where exactly is this far right I hear so much of?
On the lines of the party switch, doesn't exist.
R
Insignificant, laughed out of common society.Id say it does exist in this country in various degrees along the spectrum. Its just not a prevailing political position and will never be. Pockets of people here and there.
Again its a spectrum.
Took the words out of my mouth. In any society you have the extremes, and you have 99% of everyone else who thinks the extremes are a bunch of horse turds.Id say it does exist in this country in various degrees along the spectrum. Its just not a prevailing political position and will never be. Pockets of people here and there.
Again its a spectrum.
Insignificant, laughed out of common society.
Same could be said of Jim Jones.
Point being, they are a made up enemy to balance the true numbers of hard line lefties.
R
When all the city folks run outta food and try to steal it from the people in the country... they will wish the weren’t so “citified”.Don't worry the complete burn down will be along, soon enough. Brought to you by the Educated who see us as nothing more than peasants, very much like prior to 4-19-1775. Interesting how in the latter years, we had to bail their ass out many times over. It won't go that way again no matter the who the oppressors, are. Not many gardens or med factory's,... in the know it all city's last I checked. That's OK as it will always be on the store shelf,...won't it?
When all the city folks run outta food and try to steal it from the people in the country... they will wish the weren’t so “citified”.
Rogan backed sanders...
Either weapons grade pharmaceuticals or stupid.
I've figured out which one.
R
Taking 2A rights away.
Like it stops there...
Taking away 2A rights automatically pulls the rug out from beneath ALL of the others...
Your statement is pretty much completely wrong in my opinion.
In the 2016 elections you had 2 choices. Hillary Clinton or whoever was on the Republican Ticket. and ANY choice other than the person on the republican ticket was essentially a vote for Hillary Clinton. So yes, I would have voted for whoever was on that ticket unless they were worse than Hillary Clinton (who is a hard act to follow). Any of the candidates on the republican primary list would have been at least somewhat better for our freedoms and gun rights that Hillary who would have immediately launched an all out war on them.
It's specifically because lots of "conservatives" will only vote if they get the perfect candidate but the communists will vote for anyone as long as they are a party member, that we are loosing ground. You will NOT find a politician running for national office that is perfect or good, sorry, won't happen. They won't get to that point without having paid their dues.
A prime example of this is VA
The Communists went out and voted, even if their candidates were pretty bad. Too many folks on the "good" side, didn't bother to vote, or "voted their conscience" and so the communists won the day and now are going full steam ahead.
I'm sorry to break it to you, but until a major collapse and rebuilding, politics in this country is going to be a dirty business of getting the best you can.