Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!
Join the contest SubscribeShe can bring me half a beer anytime.Yeah, and the bitch drank almost half
If I reloaded
She can bring me half a beer anytime.
Hay fuckwhit simple search says this version was in the P-63/A-bla bla bla.WTF?
There's a lot of fail in this post.
You really know not much about this stuff, do you?
That's an Allison v-1710. It is single staged supercharged. It was also used in a P-38 lightning that added turbochargers.
I won't address the rest of it except to say that you fail this class in a spectacular fashion.
I think the negative is reversed. Looks like adaptation made to an american car so a rural mail carrier has the controls on the correct side for delivery
You are right, you can see the needles on the gauges are on the right (wrong!) side.I think the negative is reversed. Looks like adaptation made to an american car so a rural mail carrier has the controls on the correct side for delivery
Smell report please Lil doggo!
Actually had a man come into my ER with Super Glue in his eyes. He was a middle-aged guy, who had a small table next to his easy chair. The table had the usual assortment of junk. He reached while watching a game on TV, and thought he had his eye drops. Instead he put two drops of cyanoacrylate into each eye, and glued them shut. Competely.
I have a cousin that did the same thing. He stopped after the first eye, though.Actually had a man come into my ER with Super Glue in his eyes. He was a middle-aged guy, who had a small table next to his easy chair. The table had the usual assortment of junk. He reached while watching a game on TV, and thought he had his eye drops. Instead he put two drops of cyanoacrylate into each eye, and glued them shut. Competely.
Admittedly, I was a bit outside my scope of experience, so I talked to the Ophthalmologist in the big city. He said, "Happens here about once or twice a week." His advice was to just leave them glued shut, until the body eventually replaced the skin cells lining the eyelid margins. He suggested it takes between 3-7 days. He also advised that trying to remove or dissolve the glue in any manner resulted in unacceptable damage. Eventually, that was the way it turned out. He called in sick for three days, and was eventually able to open his eyes, and peel the flaking remainders of the glue off the margins himself. No damage to the eyes themselves, at all.
Dumb shit.
The super weather strip adhesive is what we used for those as well.I was gluing pads the brackets for the fuel tanks on a semi once. They keep the metal from wearing through the tank. The first one I started at the top and worked toward the bottom. Before i got there the top fell off, and put a bunch of super weather strip adhesive in hair. That took a while to wear out.
People(not myself) have used glue to do up their mohawk hairdos for over 50 years. Even someone with a mohawk knows to be picky about what glue you put in your hair.
With redundant levels of fail safes in these weapons there is ZERO chances of an accidental critical mass detonation but I would have still shit myself at the prospect of a shaped charge detonation!
Did I specifically mention the P-63? No. I wasn't going to spend the time to shred every piece of FAIL that came out of your post.Hay fuckwhit simple search says this version was in the P-63/A-bla bla bla.
so fuck right off and do a little research.
View attachment 7553027
My uncle told me the P39... Aircobra? Had the drive shaft for the propeller run between the legs of the pilot from the engine. Is that true?Did I specifically mention the P-63? No. I wasn't going to spend the time to shred every piece of FAIL that came out of your post.
Hey you, FUCKWIT, why don't YOU do some research (besides wiki that gets a lot wrong on WWII aircraft) before making STUPID, IGNORANT posts.
Good God what a moron you are.
Try wwiiperformance.net next time to see how marvelous your post was.
Let's start with the early Mustang. It was an A-36 Apache. (Not an A10 as you said) It ran an Allison. The P-51A.... Allison. They fit just fine thank you. The aircraft was designed around that engine. None of that "too big" horseshit you posted. They didn't go to the Merlin until later and it wasn't because of fit, but high altitude performance and better fuel economy.
The P-63 was the final iteration of the P-39. The P-39 was originally designed to use a turbocharger. That idea was abandoned for a myriad of reasons. Availability, politics and poor CoG amongst them.
And then that rich statement about we didn't use those fancy turbochargers or superchargers. Most all of the engines used forced induction of one sort or another. On edit, neither of those two (p-39, p-61) ever reached the performance goals they were after. Allies generally used the aircraft in secondary theaters because they just weren't that good. They lost performance over 12,000 feet or so. Only the Soviets liked them and then only in ground attack roles. Even they often replaced the Allison with their Klimov engines.
Why don't you go and put on your little beach ball beanie with the propeller on it and go sit in the corner for awhile. Dunce.
And stop making stupid posts.
Jesus H Christ.... you can't even spell "fuckwit" properly and you want to lecture me on a subject you clearly know nothing about.
What's next? Are you going to post some chart you found and tell Frank he doesn't know about long range shooting?
That whole package is very nice.
I concur!That whole package is very nice.![]()
2 day ole salmon...Smell report please Lil doggo!
My uncle told me the P39... Aircobra? Had the drive shaft for the propeller run between the legs of the pilot from the engine. Is that true?