Maggie’s Motivational Pic Thread v2.0 - - New Rules - See Post #1

FwsTYZfXoAAoVc9
 
Dude -

You have seen the original that I posted, and the highly altered that you posted, and you are still arguing?

I'm normally a fan of the hot chicks that you post, but this one has been shown multiple times to be photoshop. Or are there tons of folks backdating pictures and reducing breast/leg/ass/arm dimensions?
 
  • Like
Reactions: lash
Dude -

You have seen the original that I posted, and the highly altered that you posted, and you are still arguing?

I'm normally a fan of the hot chicks that you post, but this one has been shown multiple times to be photoshop. Or are there tons of folks backdating pictures and reducing breast/leg/ass/arm dimensions?
Can you furnish proof sources, I think I did.
Dude -

You have seen the original that I posted, and the highly altered that you posted, and you are still arguing?

I'm normally a fan of the hot chicks that you post, but this one has been shown multiple times to be photoshop. Or are there tons of folks backdating pictures and reducing breast/leg/ass/arm dimensions?
No I have just you saying some bullshit like your's is the original but under close review the pixels are altered to erase the water mark on your, so called, original.

Proof sources or GTFO

Another pic with the same trunks just below the same painting in the background with the same floor... watermarked by, yep, you guessed it....
 
Last edited: