1,3,2, but that could be rearranged pretty easily.
Maggie’s Motivational Pic Thread v2.0 - - New Rules - See Post #1
- Thread starter Snake-Eyes
- Start date
-
- Tags
- motivational pictures
So he just put his watermark on the photo because?Rich Cutrone didn't take the picture you posted. Somewhere way back in this thread, this was already addressed, but the fact that we are over 4200 pages now excuses that a bit. The real pic is -
Last edited:
That plane ain’t going anywhere with that ass, it’s not a C-5
Dude -
You have seen the original that I posted, and the highly altered that you posted, and you are still arguing?
I'm normally a fan of the hot chicks that you post, but this one has been shown multiple times to be photoshop. Or are there tons of folks backdating pictures and reducing breast/leg/ass/arm dimensions?
You have seen the original that I posted, and the highly altered that you posted, and you are still arguing?
I'm normally a fan of the hot chicks that you post, but this one has been shown multiple times to be photoshop. Or are there tons of folks backdating pictures and reducing breast/leg/ass/arm dimensions?
You want to be really disgusted? Try to imagine what that smells like. Maybe a summer afternoon at Fisherman's Warf.
And I ain't saying he didn't watermark the pic you posted. I'm saying that what you posted was photoshopped, either over or in addition to his watermark.
Need to call the insurance company that's been through a hell of a hail storm.
I laughed at that wayyyyy longer then I should have.
Can you furnish proof sources, I think I did.
No I have just you saying some bullshit like your's is the original but under close review the pixels are altered to erase the water mark on your, so called, original.
Proof sources or GTFO
Another pic with the same trunks just below the same painting in the background with the same floor... watermarked by, yep, you guessed it....
Last edited:
