• Frank's Lesson's Contest

    We want to see your skills! Post a video between now and November 1st showing what you've learned from Frank's lessons and 3 people will be selected to win a free shirt. Good luck everyone!

    Create a channel Learn more
  • Having trouble using the site?

    Contact support

Maggie’s Motivational Pic Thread v2.0 - - New Rules - See Post #1

We built them in Burlington, VT... at the GE Plant. The truth is stranger than fiction... but the gist is that the plane was designed around the gun!

I say 'we' because I ran part of their advanced programs skunkworks for a few years in the early 2000's..

An interesting bit of trivia... the original concept for the GE minigun was proved out using an early military Gatling Gun... in .45/70... that engineers in the '50s strapped an electric motor on to prove the concept. It ran like a top... at thousands of rounds per minute. The original 'test' Gatling gun is still on display up at the Ethan Allen range where all the guns are tested. Motor gone... an historical relic of epic importance!

The 'hard part' of making a Gatling gun work is not the bolts and firing... it's the materials movement of the belts. Every one of those 30mm shells weighs about 3 pounds. When you start a belt moving at 3,000 a minute (plus or minus), you are moving 3,000 x 3 pounds... or 4.5 tons of belt at a go. Yes, the belts were not long enough for a full minute of firing. But you see the problem... the inertia of those shells starting and stopping in the feed... was monsterous! The bolts worked slicker than goose-turds on linoleum. The ammo feeding was an engineering masterpiece!

Cheers,

Sirhr

Interesting information on the feed system. You are correct that the airframe was built around the weapon. For those unfamiliar with the A10, notice that the nose gear is offset to accommodate the the centerline placement of the gun.
 
I posted that pic because I'm currently working on a proposal to manage the DU waste from 6.2 million PGU-14's. Anyone got a use for 6.2M 30mm API pull downs?

I'm guessing that the USAF has decided they don't need the 1:4 or 1:5 DU APIs in the belts any more.

More idiocy like banning the CBU's, which were another of the A10's arsenal of hate and discontent. Is anyone looking around the world and NOT realizing that we couple of enemies with a LOT of armor. If we shitcan the DU rounds how long and how expensive is it going to be for us to make them again when the A10 needs to go back to killing tanks instead of durkhas?
 
More idiocy like banning the CBU's, which were another of the A10's arsenal of hate and discontent. Is anyone looking around the world and NOT realizing that we couple of enemies with a LOT of armor. If we shitcan the DU rounds how long and how expensive is it going to be for us to make them again when the A10 needs to go back to killing tanks instead of durkhas?

The common man keeps ammo in stable conditions for decades and decades, and they don't want to warehouse what they've already spent on?

I guess they'll just as for more money when we're shooting up Central Europe.
 
We built them in Burlington, VT... at the GE Plant. The truth is stranger than fiction... but the gist is that the plane was designed around the gun!

I say 'we' because I ran part of their advanced programs skunkworks for a few years in the early 2000's..

An interesting bit of trivia... the original concept for the GE minigun was proved out using an early military Gatling Gun... in .45/70... that engineers in the '50s strapped an electric motor on to prove the concept. It ran like a top... at thousands of rounds per minute. The original 'test' Gatling gun is still on display up at the Ethan Allen range where all the guns are tested. Motor gone... an historical relic of epic importance!

The 'hard part' of making a Gatling gun work is not the bolts and firing... it's the materials movement of the belts. Every one of those 30mm shells weighs about 3 pounds. When you start a belt moving at 3,000 a minute (plus or minus), you are moving 3,000 x 3 pounds... or 4.5 tons of belt at a go. Yes, the belts were not long enough for a full minute of firing. But you see the problem... the inertia of those shells starting and stopping in the feed... was monsterous! The bolts worked slicker than goose-turds on linoleum. The ammo feeding was an engineering masterpiece!

Cheers,

Sirhr

I worked with the first prototype of the Hydradragon (I think that was the name) linking/belt loading system (no longer recall the correct nomenclature). Took six guys: one to turn on/off, one to feed belts into containers and four to watch for malfunctions. Occasionally, a round would not extract from the tube. When it cycled around it would drive the projectile into the primer of another round if the inspector didn't catch it.

The engineer made the mistake of asking what we thought of his "baby."
 
I posted that pic because I'm currently working on a proposal to manage the DU waste from 6.2 million PGU-14's. Anyone got a use for 6.2M 30mm API pull downs?

I'm guessing that the USAF has decided they don't need the 1:4 or 1:5 DU APIs in the belts any more.

How about 25MM rounds? I could use about 1,000 of those. They are on the market for $10 each... but that's a bit spendy. Though could be worse, I guess. I can 'dispose' of 1,000 25mm's very inexpensively for you. I'd even pick them up! Cheers, Sirhr
 
Seen today at the SHOT show... and in the US Optics booth no less....

Snowflake AR500 steel targets! I must have one of these!!!

1516744580290.png
 
The DU projectiles would make for a fine project.

Being in KommieFornia, how do we neck that brass down to say 30 caliber. Ok- maybe 50 caliber so we can shoot some non lead projectiles at coastal deer or wild hogs with some velocity.


The department of fish and nature lovers banned lead in hunting ammo as the science showed it posed zero threat to nature.



So an all copper projectile moving at 3,000 m/S might work out ok
 
The DU projectiles would make for a fine project.

Being in KommieFornia, how do we neck that brass down to say 30 caliber. Ok- maybe 50 caliber so we can shoot some non lead projectiles at coastal deer or wild hogs with some velocity.

The department of fish and nature lovers banned lead in hunting ammo as the science showed it posed zero threat to nature.

So an all copper projectile moving at 3,000 m/S might work out ok

IIRC there is no lead in an APIT or DU round. ?
 
The DU projectiles would make for a fine project.

Being in KommieFornia, how do we neck that brass down to say 30 caliber. Ok- maybe 50 caliber so we can shoot some non lead projectiles at coastal deer or wild hogs with some velocity.


The department of fish and nature lovers banned lead in hunting ammo as the science showed it posed zero threat to nature.



So an all copper projectile moving at 3,000 m/S might work out ok

You know, it was rumored that the Army had some .375 caliber DU projectiles... ?