Maggie’s Motivational Pic Thread v2.0 - - New Rules - See Post #1
- Thread starter Snake-Eyes
- Start date
-
- Tags
- motivational pictures
30 year old black man listening to Joe Biden explain to him how his family accumulated wealth.
I knew I was going to vote for 43 before he ever ran for president. When he was governor of Texas, they executed a guy and it turned out that, because he was from Canada, he could have gotten more appeals. A reporter asked W what it said to Canadiens. W said "Don't come to Texas and kill people".
I waited till I could drive myself before I learned to surf. I was so close to making a board rack for my motorcycle... full pivot over handlebars and everything.
Dude, she's someone's mom!!
She usually has a broom and blonde hair while she's in the kitchen having sex.
Maybe instead of posting page after page from your fap bank you could start your own fapping forum. You may want to read the thread at the top of the bear pit titled "Sniper's Hide Community Update". Below is one of Frank's posts in that thread. By posting endless pages of fapping material, many of which have already been posted 2 or 3 times it's just a waste of bandwidth.
There's baking powder and other baking ingredients up there on the counter as well.
My money is on she's being a good girl, baking some magic whilst getting preparing to be pile-driven.
If something bothers you....stay away from it!
@Bullfrog08 - it bothers the guy who owns this site.
168 is working to spread education to the masses.
Go read in Lowlight Directives about image posting.
then it will make more sense.
jist: Frank doesnt wanna host thousands of bytes of pics forever on the servers. Costs a ton of $ apparently.
168 is working to spread education to the masses.
Go read in Lowlight Directives about image posting.
then it will make more sense.
jist: Frank doesnt wanna host thousands of bytes of pics forever on the servers. Costs a ton of $ apparently.
Short answer, no. Giant boar like this are pretty gross. Piglets and small sows are pretty delicious though.
If they were delicious AND worth the trouble to harvest, gut, skin, butcher, clean, and cook, they would be as hard to find as legal sized walleyes in Wisconsin.
Agreed, if you have never skinned and butchered a wild hog, it’s not like a deer. Stinky and a lot of work.
No shooting event gives me more pleasure than severing the brain stem on a feral hog. Male, female, young and old, no one gets a pass. Kill em all.
And I leave every one of them where they fall. Buzzards gotta eat too, same as worms.
That's a great old gun. My oldest is a bit younger and probably about 1907-1908 vintage. I bet she shoots fine if the bore was taken care of.
The 1903 is used for hunting all the time
They were way ahead of their time
and now a picture
They were way ahead of their time
and now a picture
I also have quite an old version as well. It is within the "this gun will blow up and take half of missouri with it" serial numbers. While I don't shoot it all the time I do shoot it.
IMHO this while it is true I think is greatly over blown.....get it. Really at this age I think it is no more likely to go kaboom over any other like age rifle provided you do not do something stupid.
And yes I have read it.
They are worth the trouble when you get a 50-150 pounder. The trouble is when you have lack of freezer space and the stench of rotting carcasses from the ones you left in the field. We started gut shooting them so that they don't fuck up Everybody's hunting areas. The buzzards are even getting picky now. I had 2 hog carcasses and a doe carcass in the bone pit opening day of bow season. Went to discard another hunters doe gut pile and my doe carcass was nothing but bones, nothing touched the hogs.
@Maxwell
Generally, I have no problem firing 100+ year old firearms within their limitations.
This particular one is more complicated. As a 1906 production Rock Island, it falls well into the "Low Serial Number" batch of M1903 rifles. These rifles were/are famous for receivers bursting and bolts shattering lugs at a high rate (dozens of documented instances). This tendency is attributed to the 'old school' way they were heat-treated prior to ~1918, which involved expert craftsmen eyeballing the process and relying on their judgement.
No one really had any problems with it, or noticed into circa 1917-1918 when a couple intersecting problems magnified it- wartime production increased throughput with less attention applied to each gun, and more sub contractors were making ammunition, resulting in a lower average ammunition quality.
When the Ordnance Dept went back and applied pyrometers and 'science', they figured out the old eyeballing process resulted in heat treat temps of +/- 300F. Some receivers were just too hard, and brittle, as a result.
These receivers will generally hold if used properly, but will often shatter if: subjected to chamber pressures in excess of 70 000 PSI, a case head fails, or the receiver is stuck laterally with something hard. I suppose they could also crack when being rebarreled, although this seems to be more of a problem with M1917 rifles.
Back to the pictured gun, I'd probably be OK shooting it, but certainly would not push anything harder than M2 ball spec. That receiver has survived two rebarrels without cracking- first when the barrel was pulled and re-chambered to -06 spec, then again when it was re-barreled prior to WW1. Additionally, it has a later (1919) bolt that would have the proper treat and therefore not shear lugs.
