My Test Loads: 178gr Hornady Amax, Varget in AR10

Jer

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
May 25, 2008
899
0
46
Loveland, Colorado
So after researching I think I finally have narrowed down what I'm gong to run for my first batch of test loads and wanted to post here some details for others who may want to use the same components or that might have a similar rifle looking for a place to start. I'll start there.

The rifle is a DPMS Panther upper which began life as a LR308 with a 24" bull barrel with a 1:10 twist. I had the barrel cut down to 20" and threaded for my YHM flash hider which has QD threads for my YHM Phantom suppressor which I shoot through. Other than that the upper is your garden variety DPMS upper.

The ammo I'm looking for is kind a magic bullet if you will. My goal is something that will be sub MOA and yet heavy enough to fly relatively straight in stiffer winds since most of the shooting I do is in the Northern Colorado, Cheyenne & Western Nebraska area which can all get quite windy. An added bonus is a round that will also work well for game should I decide to use it for such. In other words I was looking for something that would kind of meet all my needs well enough to not need to mess with working up several loads for different situations. I knew I wanted to go heavier with the barrel being 1:10 and 20" and started down the path of 175gr Sierra Matchking bullets. I wasted a few days just trying to source them and it was during this search that I stumbled upon the 178gr A-max by Hornady. I began digging and heard all sorts of positive things on them including from people who previously shot the 175gr SMK bullets that liked the Amax better. I made a couple calls and found a few hundred at a local shop and decided that I would give them a try. After a little reading around I settled on the following components for this setup:

178gr Hornady Amax bullets
New Winchester brass (I had some x1 fired LC but it was a mess)
Federal 210 primers
Varget powder

I loaded the rounds to 2.8" OAL and the first thing i noticed was how consistent these bullets were when measured. They were substantially more consistent than the SMK's I had used before and have read a few different things that leads me to believe this is not uncommon between these two manufacturers as of late. All 50rds I loaded was within a few thousandths plus or minus of each other and one thing I noticed is there seemed to be two variances... once would be spot on and the other would be about three thousandths long which was plenty acceptable. With the SMK I used they would vary a lot more and there didn't appear to be any uniformity to the variances the way the Amax seemed to have. Again, this is only a single box of 100 that I used only half of so take that with a grain of salt as i t could be attributed to the same batch or.... who knows. Just something I noted as a positive right out of the gate.

That being said I did a little reading about powders for this type of setup and it looks like people usually end up with a honey of a round in the 43.0-45.0 grain range using Varget. This seemed like a good place to start and while I planned to start a full grain low with my Lake City brass since it's a thicker wall I decided to jump right to the bottom end of that to start testing with the Winchester brass. So, I have ten each of the following grains:

43.0
43.5
44.0
44.5
45.0

I'm obviously going to start with the 43.0 and check carefully for pressure warnings with each shot. Once I determine which yields the tightest groups at 100yds I will work up more at that pressure and run them over a chrono to see what speed they're pushing. Kind of curious to see what this platform is capable of with decent ammo. The only thing I've run through it up to this point is 50 year old Lake City military ammo and it's shown some potential. Here's what the rifle looks like as well as a snap shot of the ammo sitting in wait for tomorrow.

2010-04-21%2015.06.09.jpg


IMG_2072.JPG


More to follow hopefully tomorrow after I get a chance to run through these.
 
Re: My Test Loads: 178gr Hornady Amax, Varget in AR10

With a lot of the bullets out there, it's not too uncommon to see differences in length of more then .015. With the AMAX, it's more consistent because of the polymer tip. It's best to measure off the ogive as that would give a more consistent reading with any type of bullet. Some bolt guns it won't matter too much as the mags we use gives us more room to play with, I am pretty sure it is much more sensitive with a autoloader.

Sounds like you are on the right track with your load development. A good read on load development is the Optimal Charge Weight method. Or the ladder test, but as I understand it, you would have to do it at longer distances.

G
 
Re: My Test Loads: 178gr Hornady Amax, Varget in AR10

Now that I'm reloading again. I'm planning on doing the same thing. I Want one load for everything.

I'm going to run 178gr amaxes and CCI primers, but I'm thinking about 8208 for powder.
 
Re: My Test Loads: 178gr Hornady Amax, Varget in AR10

Unfortunately the wind didn't cooperate long enough to finish testing. I was able to get through the first two pressures with good results though. My groups tightened up about 2x over that LC ammo I was shooting previously. The groups seemed to tighten up with increased pressure (I got half way through the third pressure) but only another day shooting will determine what the real results are. It likely won't be until next week until I get another opportunity to complete this so stay tuned.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Luvman</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Now that I'm reloading again. I'm planning on doing the same thing. I Want one load for everything.

I'm going to run 178gr amaxes and CCI primers, but I'm thinking about 8208 for powder.

</div></div>

Post your results and link to that thread here so those interested can find it.
 
Re: My Test Loads: 178gr Hornady Amax, Varget in AR10

When I had a LR308 my load was
178Amax @ mag length
Win Brass
CCi 200 or BR2 primers
44.6 RL15
Crimped with a Lee FCD
 
Re: My Test Loads: 178gr Hornady Amax, Varget in AR10

44gr of Varget in LC Match cases, CCI 200 primers, 175SMK, yields good groups in 18" Noveske N6.

Win brass may require a bit more Varget to reproduce this load.
 
Re: My Test Loads: 178gr Hornady Amax, Varget in AR10

I would be interested what kind of velocities you guys are getting in your sweet spots?

I'm also developing a 178 amax load, but in my remmy blu print action, 26" 1-10 twist barrel, I keep hitting pressure much sooner than expected.

Currently 'closing in' on 42.2 grn varget, lapua brass @2610 fps average.

42.5 = ejector marks and very flat primers,
42.8 = .0005 head expansion!!
 
Re: My Test Loads: 178gr Hornady Amax, Varget in AR10

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: gfunkUK</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I would be interested what kind of velocities you guys are getting in your sweet spots?

I'm also developing a 178 amax load, but in my remmy blu print action, 26" 1-10 twist barrel, I keep hitting pressure much sooner than expected.

Currently 'closing in' on 42.2 grn varget, lapua brass @2610 fps average.

42.5 = ejector marks and very flat primers,
42.8 = .0005 head expansion!! </div></div>

What brass are you using?
 
Re: My Test Loads: 178gr Hornady Amax, Varget in AR10

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jer</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: gfunkUK</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I would be interested what kind of velocities you guys are getting in your sweet spots?

I'm also developing a 178 amax load, but in my remmy blu print action, 26" 1-10 twist barrel, I keep hitting pressure much sooner than expected.

Currently 'closing in' on 42.2 grn varget, lapua brass @2610 fps average.

42.5 = ejector marks and very flat primers,
42.8 = .0005 head expansion!! </div></div>

What brass are you using? </div></div>

lapua brass.. i know it has lower capacity than winchester.. and have read that people generally reduce charges .5- 1.0 grn, but i see sooo many people posting thier charges anywhere between 43.5 to 45 grns, it makes me wonder why my rifle hits pressure so soon!!

thats why i wondered if my velocity (2610fps) is anywhere near acceptable for this bullet?
to be honest, i struggled with the 155 scenars too.. pressure signs not long after peoples minimum charges..

so far im getting mixed results with the 178 amax, mostly good.. but not happy consistancy yet.
 
Re: My Test Loads: 178gr Hornady Amax, Varget in AR10

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: gfunkUK</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
42.5 = ejector marks and very flat primers,
42.8 = .0005 head expansion!! </div></div>

You could just be overreacting. Do they extract easily or is your bolt sticky?
 
Re: My Test Loads: 178gr Hornady Amax, Varget in AR10

Heck, my 155-gr bullet loads are as hot as I dare take them with 46 gr Varget. Drop 1 grain to 45 and put in a bullet more than 15% heavier, with a longer bearing surface???

gfunUK, how short are you resizing them compared to your fired cases? I ask because I had really flat primers but no other pressure signs, and expected safe velocities, with one load. I went ahead and shot them, but learned later that I was WAY over-sizing them for my chamber. Broken cases at reload #3. Backed the sizer die off from the "by the book" cram-fit to the shellplate so the cases were no longer way minimum, but were maximum per the Wilson case gage, and those flat primers weren't flat no more! They were backing out and mushrooming just before the casehead slammed back into the bolt face. Cases went back and squished the primer, making it look flat. Never had a loose primer pocket though.

It's worth a look. IMO, some of the loads posted here are probably closer to 70,000 psi than the specified max of 60,191 piezo. Me, I don't want to go 16.66% overpressure...even if the gun can handle it.
 
Re: My Test Loads: 178gr Hornady Amax, Varget in AR10

I was loading 45.0 grains of Varget, in LC brass with the 178 Amax at 2.84" OAL, it would shoot in the mid .2's in my 5R Rem.

I have ran about 900 rounds of this load downrange.

BUT, I had noticed loose primer pockets in about every 20th case or so.

Bought Quickload and ran the specs...close to 70K psi!!!!

I think the very long freebore (about .200")in this gun saved me from more problems.

I'm gonna start a new load workup soon. What a PITA, all my carefully worked out (from real data) dope is down the drain!
 
Re: My Test Loads: 178gr Hornady Amax, Varget in AR10

at 43 i have flat primers and ejector marks also . try 41 41.5 and 42 ... had my best results .75 moa or less all the time with 42.
 
Re: My Test Loads: 178gr Hornady Amax, Varget in AR10

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tekpc007</div><div class="ubbcode-body">at 43 i have flat primers and ejector marks also . try 41 41.5 and 42 ... had my best results .75 moa or less all the time with 42.</div></div>

i have been body sizing with the redding body sizer, and collet sizing the neck,
but decided to neck collet them ONLY yesterday, to see how the larger case capacity made any difference to the pressure..

i managed to get up to 42.4grn, (groups started to open a little at 42.5)
with absolutely no signs, primers still nice and rounded etc..
im sure i could have gone higher still, but felt i was creeping out of a 'node' so was happy to stay put.

also, my groups have shrunk to <.5 MOA @ 200,400,500 yards!

i loaded up x30 more rounds to check, and all shot the same. im going to try chrono some today, (raining yesterday)
but im guessing they are still close to 2610fps, as they fit the ballistic table very well out to 500yrd so far..

conclusion.. using the Lee neck collet only, certainly increased MY comfortable pressure limits, and had a marked effect on accuracy too!!