Navy drafting new UFO reporting guidelines

Sounds like the new guidlines will insure "no" reporting.

That clip with the fighter crew commenting on the hyper mach object they were following is much more credible than most stoner reports of lights in the sky.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1J04 and redleg1013
It's about time the U.S. Navy started getting 'real' about foo fighters --- since they (foo fighters) are more than likely to carry weapons of mass destruction.

How do I know??? Because I've seen one display one of it's weaponry in the sky, approximately 40 miles west of Washington D.C.; one night in November, 1976.
 
Last edited:
It's about time the U.S. Navy started getting 'real' about foo fighters --- since they (foo fighters) are more than likely to carry weapons of mass destruction.

How do I know??? Because I've seen one display one of it's weaponry in the sky, approximately 40 miles west of Washington D.C.; one night in November, 1976.
That was Hillary lighting farts.
 
It's about time the U.S. Navy started getting 'real' about foo fighters --- since they (foo fighters) are more than likely to carry weapons of mass destruction.

How do I know??? Because I've seen one display one of it's weaponry in the sky, approximately 40 miles west of Washington D.C.; one night in November, 1976.

That was a space shuttle riding piggy-back on a 747.
 
It's about time the U.S. Navy started getting 'real' about foo fighters --- since they (foo fighters) are more than likely to carry weapons of mass destruction.

How do I know??? Because I've seen one display one of it's weaponry in the sky, approximately 40 miles west of Washington D.C.; one night in November, 1976.

This.....

f-navypenis-a-20171119.jpg
 
I’ve seen weird stuff.

My father was in the army in the 60’s civil air defense, before Air Force took it over. He turned on the radar one night and watched something crossing from horizon to horizon in 3 or 4 radar sweeps.