Thanks for the info Doug. Is the 3200 the same basic software/bluetooth as the 3500(hardware differences of course) that other folks have been having connection issues with? Was debating either a 3200 or 3500 but on the fence given the 3500 reviews.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's not unusual, it is harder to have more power and a tight beam, and be cost effective. They make up for it in the dsp algorithms. It will range father but not as good through some loops.The part that is confusing me is the beam divergence is the same as the 2800. Which if I am reading it right is tighter than the 3500? But the 3500 has a more powerful laser?
Thank you!
Looks like the 10x’s are 3.5oz heavier than the Swaro El 10x Ranges.
All these binos are 3k and up. I'm not sure where you saw $1300.Any ideas how these would compare to the El-R's. For $1300 seems like a good option.
All these binos are 3k and up. I'm not sure where you saw $1300.
Correct and they are still availableI was interested in binocular RF's, so I see they're the 2700's (correct?).
But are they equal in ranging speed and beam size/divergence?The 3200 will give you 500 extra on reflected and probably 200 years more on game
I took my 3200s out today to range some stuff along with a Terrapin X. With buildings and rocks out to 3000 yards, they both did a decent job (reliability past 1000 yards is not perfect with either device, of course, but it seemed like if the target had good reflectivity then you’d get a good range, otherwise no reading). It seemed like the Leica was faster and more reliable. I had to be much more careful about stabilizing the Terrapin X, and it takes much longer for it to be ready to range a new target.
As far as Bluetooth connection, I had the 3200.com connected to my Kestrel 5700 the whole time and it would display a firing solution on both the binos and the kestrel after a few seconds. It wasn’t any kind of Bluetooth stress test though.
Overall, great performance by the Leica binoculars. I think the rangefinder performance is very close to the Sig 3000BDX, but the optical quality is so much better on the Leica that it is like night and day. There is still a pretty big gap between any of these devices and one of the PLRFs, but I don’t really see the Terrapin X justifying its price.
Both were on me the whole time.There have been some reports of broken connections due to movement of the 3200s and distance from the Kestrel. Sounds like you had no broken connections, about how far was the 3200 from the Kestrel?
Do you mean for the rangefinder? It’s not a dot, it’s a circle, and it’s pretty large. I think they do that because there is no zeroing process. It’s one of my biggest complaints. It is difficult or impossible to range a very small target like what they have at rimfire matches.Is the dot smaller than the EL-O? Only complaint with my Swaro's.
Yes I find the circle in my EL-O's to be to big. I was just curious if it was smaller on the 3200.com? I had a Leica 2400-R and remember it having a smaller circle and seemed to range quicker.Do you mean for the rangefinder? It’s not a dot, it’s a circle, and it’s pretty large. I think they do that because there is no zeroing process. It’s one of my biggest complaints. It is difficult or impossible to range a very small target like what they have at rimfire matches.