Just strange they released this. Wonder if the original bolts are not holding up and this is Sig being Sig, introducing parts to fix issues and making the end consumer foot the bill. Or maybe they're releasing a hybrid case in 308 and 6.5CM?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know they are having problems with the 277.Just strange they released this. Wonder if the original bolts are not holding up and this is Sig being Sig, introducing parts to fix issues and making the end consumer foot the bill. Or maybe they're releasing a hybrid case in 308 and 6.5CM?
how is the 6.5 creed accuracy at those high pressures? This sounds very interesting. Also, will the .277 cases fit in the 6.5 creed die sets?I know they are having problems with the 277.
So I doubt they would release high pressure into standard cartridges at this time. I have 1000 277 hybrid cases and have formed them to 308 and 6 5 Creedmoor. Hand loaded to the 80,000 psi area in 2 regular rifle actions...400 rds and check action for set back, so far it's okay..
But not recommend.
As for standard 308 and 6.5 CM I use high pressure bolts in both calibers in AR 10 s which will take any load I put in the bt guns. They h a very the .062" firing pin...but I did Not put an 80,000psi load in the AR 10. But with an adjustable gas block 65,000 psi is doable.
In good barrels accuracy is very good. The hybrid case forms well in all standard steel dies.how is the 6.5 creed accuracy at those high pressures? This sounds very interesting. Also, will the .277 cases fit in the 6.5 creed die sets?
I you are going to try the 6.5 CM the powder is RL26, for the 140 to 150 gr...I use no other and my 8 lb keg is down to about 4 lbs...and it's been absent for several yrs. You need some reloading experience and a chronograph min. Normal powders like H4350 fall short. It's true with all these high pressure loadings. Powders are limited, that are useful... and many seem unavailable at this time.Looks good though
Thanks for all the info. Probably going to wait for SIG to advance the .277 into the cross. waiting for proof research to make a carbon .277 barrel and reloading availability for the fury round eventually becomes available. I can only hunt with copper rounds so there are no options to use the fury round as of now.I you are going to try the 6.5 CM the powder is RL26, for the 140 to 150 gr...I use no other and my 8 lb keg is down to about 4 lbs...and it's been absent for several yrs. You need some reloading experience and a chronograph min. Normal powders like H4350 fall short. It's true with all these high pressure loadings. Powders are limited, that are useful... and many seem unavailable at this time.
The cartridge designers like Sig have the deep pockets to have powder companies blend over 60 powders to find the one for a small range of bullets for that caliber, to be loaded into the high pressure 277 Fury are for military use and unavailable to the public, and are top secret at the time of development. So all we can do is get close with what is available on the commercial market at this time. So that's why the reluctance to reveal load data, as there is no control of seating depth, or chamber, action strength, reloading practices, or component variations. All of which add or subtract to chamber pressure. Plus Sig seems to be having trouble, with certain aspects of their bolt gun, discharge when the bolt is closed was an early one...don't know if high pressure was a problem with any of the steel components.
But a significant improvement can be made for a careful reloader...and of coarse again none of it is recommended....but reloads void most firearm warranties anyway...as always be careful...don't push powders that don't get ya there.
Hornady and Barns make copper 277 bullets for for handloading. So they could easily be loaded in the .277 hybrid cases. If all this hybrid stuff takes off and Sig gets the 277 problems ironed out, it will all be more user friendly with load data and possibly new powders and bullets designed for the 277. Time will tell. In the mean time I'm working on other projects but have found a few powders through QL that are more readily available and work in the 6.5 CM resized 277 hybrid cases.Thanks for all the info. Probably going to wait for SIG to advance the .277 into the cross. waiting for proof research to make a carbon .277 barrel and reloading availability for the fury round eventually becomes available. I can only hunt with copper rounds so there are no options to use the fury round as of now.
I'm reloading the 277 fury now with the hybrid case. You can buy unfired hybrid brass. Redding makes dies. I also only shoot non-lead for hunting. I just finished up my load development for the 140gr Badlands SBD-2 and the DRT 152gr Terminal shock. All the pre-fit people are making barrels chambered in it. I'm not a fan of carbon, so that keeps them quite affordable to.Thanks for all the info. Probably going to wait for SIG to advance the .277 into the cross. waiting for proof research to make a carbon .277 barrel and reloading availability for the fury round eventually becomes available. I can only hunt with copper rounds so there are no options to use the fury round as of now.
Good idea, but it looks like that check rest is crazy low for an optic.
Where can we find unfired hybrid brass? I've been pulling assembled rounds for the brass.I'm reloading the 277 fury now with the hybrid case. You can buy unfired hybrid brass. Redding makes dies. I also only shoot non-lead for hunting. I just finished up my load development for the 140gr Badlands SBD-2 and the DRT 152gr Terminal shock. All the pre-fit people are making barrels chambered in it. I'm not a fan of carbon, so that keeps them quite affordable to.
There are only a few powders that get the pressure that high, with an elongated curve and also fit in the case.
And honestly, even the brass case at 65kpsi and that 140gr SBD-2, it's lethal on anything I'd shoot a 140gr 277 bullet at to past where I'd take the shot. The brass case is within 30fps of a 270win with the same barrel length. It does better than the 308w vs 30-06.
American Reloading has them from time to time.Where can we find unfired hybrid brass? I've been pulling assembled rounds for the brass.
Much appreciated and in stock.American Reloading has them from time to time.
That stock wont work. The Cross stock has the milled out slot that allows the bolt to come back. Also, the rise in the Kate Moss is too close to the receiver and would not allow for a full retraction of the bolt. I called PMM a while back and we talked over measurements on the phone. They were awesome.Parker Mountain Machine has their "Kate Moss" which is similar but it has the option of a cheek riser in different heights so will likely be more effective. I have one on my Spear LT. Not sure what to think about the Trax, seems like a parts bin special with parts that aren't well thought out (stock and grip).
View attachment 8296678
I wouldnt do a heavier barrel. Add weights when needed, take them off when not needed.So I'm curious if anyone has any experience/pointers regarding balancing the rifle through rebarreling.
I'm at the point where I'm ready to rebarrel my 6.5 Cross pretty soon and I was hoping to do so in such a way as to move the balance point of the rifle just slightly ahead of the barricade guard/magwell. Ideally I'd like to keep the same barrel length same as stock as it fits my bag perfectly, and instead work with barrel diameter. I realize that's not the most efficient way to move weight forward and that I'll end up with a slightly heavier rifle, but I'm already saving a good bit of weight by going somewhat minimalist on the optic and willing to make that tradeoff.
Has anyone tried this, or am I way out to lunch?
EDIT: I'm in Canada and therefore a Suppressor is unfortunately out of the question. I'm running an Area 419 Hellfire brake instead.
Slightly longer, but my Craddock with a 20” and ~M24 contour balances as described.So I'm curious if anyone has any experience/pointers regarding balancing the rifle through rebarreling.
I'm at the point where I'm ready to rebarrel my 6.5 Cross pretty soon and I was hoping to do so in such a way as to move the balance point of the rifle just slightly ahead of the barricade guard/magwell. Ideally I'd like to keep the same barrel length same as stock as it fits my bag perfectly, and instead work with barrel diameter. I realize that's not the most efficient way to move weight forward and that I'll end up with a slightly heavier rifle, but I'm already saving a good bit of weight by going somewhat minimalist on the optic and willing to make that tradeoff.
Has anyone tried this, or am I way out to lunch?
EDIT: I'm in Canada and therefore a Suppressor is unfortunately out of the question. I'm running an Area 419 Hellfire brake instead.
Slightly longer, but my Craddock with a 20” and ~M24 contour balances as described.
Found the link
If you want to get an Arca rail further back take a look at the Odin Works Arca Trax. I was able to mount the first slot (the single hole) nearest the magwell. As seen in the pics the split design allows a more rearward purchase. Its also super low profile.
*no affiliation, just something I found and wanted to try
I have this bag (30 inch) and fits tight with a break on the barrel but fits (6.6 creed with 18 in) . It's comfortable on my back too.I need a fairly well padded but still lightweight bag for a folded 16" Cross.
For an a light aircraft. Ideally with backpack straps.
I think the folded length is like 27" or so.
I need a fairly well padded but still lightweight bag for a folded 16" Cross.
For an a light aircraft. Ideally with backpack straps.
I think the folded length is like 27" or so.
Any recommendations?
Spoke to them and they were still waiting on extensions from Sig. I asked how many, he said a lot. It will most likely be March according to another guy there.Nothing on Odin Works’ website yet…
Proof also waiting for the barrel extensions to ship out orders. Last I heardSpoke to them and they were still waiting on extensions from Sig. I asked how many, he said a lot. It will most likely be March according to another guy there.
I you are going to try the 6.5 CM the powder is RL26, for the 140 to 150 gr...I use no other and my 8 lb keg is down to about 4 lbs...and it's been absent for several yrs. You need some reloading experience and a chronograph min. Normal powders like H4350 fall short. It's true with all these high pressure loadings. Powders are limited, that are useful... and many seem unavailable at this time.
The cartridge designers like Sig have the deep pockets to have powder companies blend over 60 powders to find the one for a small range of bullets for that caliber, to be loaded into the high pressure 277 Fury are for military use and unavailable to the public, and are top secret at the time of development. So all we can do is get close with what is available on the commercial market at this time. So that's why the reluctance to reveal load data, as there is no control of seating depth, or chamber, action strength, reloading practices, or component variations. All of which add or subtract to chamber pressure. Plus Sig seems to be having trouble, with certain aspects of their bolt gun, discharge when the bolt is closed was an early one...don't know if high pressure was a problem with any of the steel components.
But a significant improvement can be made for a careful reloader...and of coarse again none of it is recommended....but reloads void most firearm warranties anyway...as always be careful...don't push powders that don't get ya there.
What the heck is 4835?expect from a 140 class bullet assuming H4835?
What the heck is 4835?
The result of my dyslexic brain typing the wrong powder number... H4350. I fixed it.What the heck is 4835?
This isn’t nick but I’ll let him knowHey Nick - I bought one of your barrels for my Cross. It is terrific!
Any chance you know how to get an extra barrel extension? I noticed Proof is shipping barrels WITH an extension now.