Anyone has a blow up pics of the two reticles by any chance?
Can't decide which one to have for .308
It's gonna be 3.5-15x50
Thanks.
Can't decide which one to have for .308
It's gonna be 3.5-15x50
Thanks.
Rifle Scopes NF NP-R1 or NP-R2???
- Thread starter VYD
- Start date
Re: NF NP-R1 or NP-R2???
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: VYD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Anyone has a blow up pics of the two reticles by any chance?
Can't decide which one to have for .308
It's gonna be 3.5-15x50
Thanks. </div></div>
NP-R1 for the 3.5-15x MOA Second Focal Plane: Sub-tensions will be easier use. But, for a 2.5-10x in MOA we would recommend the NP-R2.
For a 3.5-15x F1 in MOA, go with the new NP-RF1
Thanks,
Mason @ CST
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: VYD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Anyone has a blow up pics of the two reticles by any chance?
Can't decide which one to have for .308
It's gonna be 3.5-15x50
Thanks. </div></div>
NP-R1 for the 3.5-15x MOA Second Focal Plane: Sub-tensions will be easier use. But, for a 2.5-10x in MOA we would recommend the NP-R2.
For a 3.5-15x F1 in MOA, go with the new NP-RF1
Thanks,
Mason @ CST
Re: NF NP-R1 or NP-R2???
I love my NP-R1. I had one in a 3.5-15, but I upgrded to the 5.5-22 and went with the same reticle.
I love my NP-R1. I had one in a 3.5-15, but I upgrded to the 5.5-22 and went with the same reticle.
Re: NF NP-R1 or NP-R2???
I used the NP-R2 for a long time in local precision rifle matches. I managed to make it work but I found a lot of times where I wish I had the NP-R1, especially when it came to range estimation and holding for tricky winds. The NP-R2 doesn't go to the ends of the glass like the NP-R1 but I don't feel either of them are "busy".
I've recently switched to a USO and love the fine subtenstions of the CMG MOA reticle.
I used the NP-R2 for a long time in local precision rifle matches. I managed to make it work but I found a lot of times where I wish I had the NP-R1, especially when it came to range estimation and holding for tricky winds. The NP-R2 doesn't go to the ends of the glass like the NP-R1 but I don't feel either of them are "busy".
I've recently switched to a USO and love the fine subtenstions of the CMG MOA reticle.
Re: NF NP-R1 or NP-R2???
depends on what you are doing, if you want to range with your reticle, the npr1 is the way to go. a lot of people do find it busy, but if you can get past that, it works well. personally i hunt with the npr2, and can still get a rough range estimate, but it isn't as easy as it is with the npr1.
depends on what you are doing, if you want to range with your reticle, the npr1 is the way to go. a lot of people do find it busy, but if you can get past that, it works well. personally i hunt with the npr2, and can still get a rough range estimate, but it isn't as easy as it is with the npr1.
Re: NF NP-R1 or NP-R2???
I have the NP-R1 on my 5.5X22X50 and like it a lot. I have not found it to be "too busy".
For me it made the most sense based on my particular needs/wants. I do not think I would have been as happy with the NP-R2.
I have the NP-R1 on my 5.5X22X50 and like it a lot. I have not found it to be "too busy".
For me it made the most sense based on my particular needs/wants. I do not think I would have been as happy with the NP-R2.
Re: NF NP-R1 or NP-R2???
Very happy with the NP-R1 it's not busy. I think you'll know that the second you look though it. It's easy for hold overs and wind.
I've also shot using the NP-R2, but only @ 100 yards.
Very happy with the NP-R1 it's not busy. I think you'll know that the second you look though it. It's easy for hold overs and wind.
I've also shot using the NP-R2, but only @ 100 yards.
Re: NF NP-R1 or NP-R2???
I've played around with both and prefer the NP-R1. Not only is it easier to see, but it doesn't have the stupid 5 MOA windage increments of the NP-R2.
I've played around with both and prefer the NP-R1. Not only is it easier to see, but it doesn't have the stupid 5 MOA windage increments of the NP-R2.
Re: NF NP-R1 or NP-R2???
NP-R1 if you intend to do any type of range. Absolutely one of my favorite reticle. Not a lot of frills, but it gets the job done well.
NP-R1 if you intend to do any type of range. Absolutely one of my favorite reticle. Not a lot of frills, but it gets the job done well.
Re: NF NP-R1 or NP-R2???
If your stuck with MOA, yes the R1 is the way to roll. If not come to the bright side... Mil/Mil.
If your stuck with MOA, yes the R1 is the way to roll. If not come to the bright side... Mil/Mil.
Re: NF NP-R1 or NP-R2???
What I do not like about the NPR2 is the 5moa win lines, I have a hard time breaking it down. The NPR1 is 2moa so for me it is a lot simpler to break it down for wind hold or corrections.
Mike @ CST
What I do not like about the NPR2 is the 5moa win lines, I have a hard time breaking it down. The NPR1 is 2moa so for me it is a lot simpler to break it down for wind hold or corrections.
Mike @ CST
Re: NF NP-R1 or NP-R2???
My first two NXS 5.5-22x50 had the NP-R2 reticle. I decided to switch to the NP-R1 and I've never been happier. I love the NP-R1 reticle and as others have said, it's better for ranging and is also darker.
My first two NXS 5.5-22x50 had the NP-R2 reticle. I decided to switch to the NP-R1 and I've never been happier. I love the NP-R1 reticle and as others have said, it's better for ranging and is also darker.
Re: NF NP-R1 or NP-R2???
This, if the npr2 had smaller wind marks, I think I would like it better. I have the npr2 and find it not difficult to split the 2moa vertical, but the 5moa horizontal is too much.
This, if the npr2 had smaller wind marks, I think I would like it better. I have the npr2 and find it not difficult to split the 2moa vertical, but the 5moa horizontal is too much.
Similar threads
