Re: nightforce or schmidt and bender
OK...First I'll say this...while you CAN shoot a deer from that distance, why would you CHOOSE to? Even Mule deer in open Nevada/Utah/Wyoming Territory don't need to be attempted from that distance.
Second, your Lazzeroni certainly has the capability to reach out effectively to those distances. I have an S&B mounted on my Warbird, but I have a Swarovski mounted on my Patriot and Tomahawk and a NF 2.5-10 on my LR308.
For a hunting scope, I think it's hard to beat a Swarovski. Simple, small illuminated crosshair, HIGH QUALITY glass and unbelievably effective in lowlight early morning or late afternoon hunting applications. Clarity is only rivaled by S&B IMHO.
I also love my S&B but talking about the PM series isn't totally germane to hunting scope discussion, as the PM is a tactical scope. My S&B is a 3-12 x 50 with the illuminated L9 crosshair and it's an EXCELLENT <span style="font-style: italic">hunting</span> scope.
As for tactical applications, the S&B vs NF from an apples to apples discussion is, to me, pretty cut and dry. S&B has superior clarity, but is it superior to the tune of a grand? Maybe, maybe not. I feel confident the NF scopes have been extremely well vetted by the military and have confidence they can stand up to some unintended abuse. The glass is VERY clear, there is great eye relief and the reticle illumination is outstanding. For the price difference and given that unless the world falls apart and I find myself in a SHTF situation, I couldn't ever see the need for a better scope to "defend my life" than the NF. Besides...if things ever got that bad, the last thing I can see myself doing is giving away a hidden position by trying to "defend" from 1000 yards away. YMMV.
OK...First I'll say this...while you CAN shoot a deer from that distance, why would you CHOOSE to? Even Mule deer in open Nevada/Utah/Wyoming Territory don't need to be attempted from that distance.
Second, your Lazzeroni certainly has the capability to reach out effectively to those distances. I have an S&B mounted on my Warbird, but I have a Swarovski mounted on my Patriot and Tomahawk and a NF 2.5-10 on my LR308.
For a hunting scope, I think it's hard to beat a Swarovski. Simple, small illuminated crosshair, HIGH QUALITY glass and unbelievably effective in lowlight early morning or late afternoon hunting applications. Clarity is only rivaled by S&B IMHO.
I also love my S&B but talking about the PM series isn't totally germane to hunting scope discussion, as the PM is a tactical scope. My S&B is a 3-12 x 50 with the illuminated L9 crosshair and it's an EXCELLENT <span style="font-style: italic">hunting</span> scope.
As for tactical applications, the S&B vs NF from an apples to apples discussion is, to me, pretty cut and dry. S&B has superior clarity, but is it superior to the tune of a grand? Maybe, maybe not. I feel confident the NF scopes have been extremely well vetted by the military and have confidence they can stand up to some unintended abuse. The glass is VERY clear, there is great eye relief and the reticle illumination is outstanding. For the price difference and given that unless the world falls apart and I find myself in a SHTF situation, I couldn't ever see the need for a better scope to "defend my life" than the NF. Besides...if things ever got that bad, the last thing I can see myself doing is giving away a hidden position by trying to "defend" from 1000 yards away. YMMV.