Inside of 800-900 there's not much difference due to the extra speed, at least not a perceived one to me... Around 1200 it becomes very noticeable just how high the BC is on that 208
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyone looking at a 178grn bullet don't forget the Hornady 178 BTHP with it's .530 BC. Almost equal to the 190 SMK's .533 but a little lighter so you can send it out faster.
yes these are very nice in a 300wm, mild recoil and shoot very well. first try at 1k had a 8" 5 shoot group off the bipod and
rear bag. wish i could find some more.
Anyone looking at a 178grn bullet don't forget the Hornady 178 BTHP with it's .530 BC. Almost equal to the 190 SMK's .533 but a little lighter so you can send it out faster.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Falar</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Greg Langelius *</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I'm another fan of the .30-'06, but so far have not gotten a chance to shoot any true LR capable rifles chambered in it, just an M70 and an R77 with sporter barrels, plus my ever-present Garand.
I'd really like to see how Palma 155's and 175's do in a Palma length barrels with appropriate twists for each.
I think that if the 155 can go the distance in a .308 chambering, it's got my vote out of an '06.
I figure If I need more than that, I'm really out of my league anyway. My wind skills at 1000yd are at best marginal, and for me, it's a stretch to anticipate significantly longer distances.
Meanwhile, the 175 gets the same benefits, but doesn't turn the '06 into a shoulder sledgehammer at the bench, or prone.
Greg </div></div>
If using an '06 for LR shooting, why even bother with the lightweight bullets? Driving the 208/210s to over 2800fps with RL22 would be the way to go for fighting the wind and staying supersonic as long as possible. </div></div>
I'm doing the same with 208's but it's a shoulder tenderizer for sure. Much more like a 300 Winny than a normal 06 load, I think Greg's keeping that in mind when he states the 155's or 175's.
hey guys, i think there is one bullet most of you are overlooking. The Berger 30cal 230gr hybrid. its got a .743 g1/ .380 g7. if you point it, that takes to about .796 g1/ .406 g7. just a little food for thought.
Anyone looking at a 178grn bullet don't forget the Hornady 178 BTHP with it's .530 BC. Almost equal to the 190 SMK's .533 but a little lighter so you can send it out faster.
Anyone looking at a 178grn bullet don't forget the Hornady 178 BTHP with it's .530 BC. Almost equal to the 190 SMK's .533 but a little lighter so you can send it out faster.
In a 30 caliber it is very difficult to beat the 300 Win Mag. One can get right at 3K with the 190 SMK. One can usually get 2850+ shooting the 220 SMK. Recoil can be controlled by going to a heavier barrel and/muzzle break. With heavier barrels and a good shooter it typically gets very good accuracy with recoil that can be easily mastered by most experienced shooters.
If the choice is between the .300 vs .06 the mag will easily out-perform the 06 in speed, energy. and usually accuracy. This is especially true beyond 1000 yards. The barrel life on a win-mag is not unreasonable. All the components are available. I was in a very remote village in Alaska for four years and they seemed to always have cigarettes and win-mag ammo. The 300 Win is becoming as common as the 06 in the bush. On large animals (elk and above) I believe the mag is more common than the 06. The military chose the more robust mag for the next leg up for their sniper caliber. I don't think the 06 was even considered. The 06 is a fine caliber but it is not in the same class as the 300 Mag.