Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is the point of this thread?
For op to flex on us with all his experience but clearly be wrong in the end… some guns need gas adjustment end of story. Dude can flex all his military experience he wants but real world use tells a different story.What is the point of this thread?
FWIW.... I worked on a CLGS 16", with a gas port size of over .100 ( biggest pin gauge I had. )..... guess what the problem was ?The OP claims that there is no downside or failures due to being over-gassed? Maybe he can answer why the military spec'd out 0.063" as the gas port diameter for the M4 Carbine, or 0.093" for the M16. And I would be curious as to why he wouldn't drill out the gas ports to something like 0.125" on every AR that he claims to have built, to eliminate any potential under-gassed condition.
I agree with this. A vast majority of gassing problems are likely user induced. Too much buffer and/or too much spring.Didn't read the thread but will throw out my experience.
First off, I will concede that under-gassing or over-springing or over-weighting the buffer will cause more feed problems than over-gassing. You see this a lot in 3-gun and other comps where guys are trying to run the ragged edge and reduce recoil. That said, at some point, increasing the gas will 100% cause feeding, stove pipe, and ejection problems. Somewhere in the abyss I have high-speed footage that shows as much.
The lateral velocity of the ejecting case is pretty much constant and is determined by the ejector plunger spring and the ability of the extractor to properly keep hold of the case. As you increase gas, the rearward velocity component increases and the ejection angle changes, becoming more shallow. Eventually you start hitting the brass deflector (no big deal, still ejects 3:00-4:00), and then as you keep adding gas your cases smack the rear of the ejection port before they can clear the ejection port. This is when you start seeing 12:30-2:00 ejection. Keep adding gas and the cases will hit the rear of the ejection port then fly back into the upper. Sometimes you get extractor issues here, too, with the increased rearward velocity.
Bolt carrier velocity and the impulse of the BCG bottoming out causes a dynamic response to the rest of the system. Sometimes it's no big deal, sometimes, especially with sloppy magazine wells or lowers that hold the magazine at a lower height it definitely can cause feeding problems. The root issue is probably more the loosey goosey magazine well, but excessive recoil/gas isn't helping.
From an accuracy standpoint, I also have documented an increase in the frequency and the severity of fliers when increasing gas to the system.
I am firmly of the opinion that you want as little gas as is necessary to 100% function the system in the range of cleanliness/lube/temp/weather conditions you'll experience unless accuracy isn't on the priority list then gas it up to the point that you avoid the afore-mentioned function problems.
YMMV.
That is a very good explanation! Thank you!Didn't read the thread but will throw out my experience.
First off, I will concede that under-gassing or over-springing or over-weighting the buffer will cause more feed problems than over-gassing. You see this a lot in 3-gun and other comps where guys are trying to run the ragged edge and reduce recoil. That said, at some point, increasing the gas will 100% cause feeding, stove pipe, and ejection problems. Somewhere in the abyss I have high-speed footage that shows as much.
The lateral velocity of the ejecting case is pretty much constant and is determined by the ejector plunger spring and the ability of the extractor to properly keep hold of the case. As you increase gas, the rearward velocity component increases and the ejection angle changes, becoming more shallow. Eventually you start hitting the brass deflector (no big deal, still ejects 3:00-4:00), and then as you keep adding gas your cases smack the rear of the ejection port before they can clear the ejection port. This is when you start seeing 12:30-2:00 ejection. Keep adding gas and the cases will hit the rear of the ejection port then fly back into the upper. Sometimes you get extractor issues here, too, with the increased rearward velocity.
Bolt carrier velocity and the impulse of the BCG bottoming out causes a dynamic response to the rest of the system. Sometimes it's no big deal, sometimes, especially with sloppy magazine wells or lowers that hold the magazine at a lower height it definitely can cause feeding problems. The root issue is probably more the loosey goosey magazine well, but excessive recoil/gas isn't helping.
From an accuracy standpoint, I also have documented an increase in the frequency and the severity of fliers when increasing gas to the system.
I am firmly of the opinion that you want as little gas as is necessary to 100% function the system in the range of cleanliness/lube/temp/weather conditions you'll experience unless accuracy isn't on the priority list then gas it up to the point that you avoid the afore-mentioned function problems.
YMMV.
I can confirm this, I've also seen high speed video of feeding issues on an over gassed system. Carrier velocities were way too high. When gas was reduced to bring carrier velocities into normal range, the feeding issues seen on HSV went away. No changes to action spring or buffer weights were made.That said, at some point, increasing the gas will 100% cause feeding, stove pipe, and ejection problems. Somewhere in the abyss I have high-speed footage that shows as much.
I have yet to see "Over Gassing" as a source of a failure to feed malfunction to be a real issue for a few reasons:
I didn't know he was a big Ukraine guy, then again I rarely leave the semi auto subforum, but if you really want to ask him we can tag him.There is a Ukrobot here that goes by the handle of “LRRPF52” who constantly spews pro - Ukrainian propaganda and writes in the exact same bloviating style, always presuming to speak from a soapbox of moral and intellectual superiority.
A hallmark of this bot’s exposition style is the use of “I have yet to see.”
LRRPF52, is this you?
There is a Ukrobot here that goes by the handle of “LRRPF52” who constantly spews pro - Ukrainian propaganda and writes in the exact same bloviating style, always presuming to speak from a soapbox of moral and intellectual superiority.
A hallmark of this bot’s exposition style is the use of “I have yet to see.”
LRRPF52, is this you?
I keep an open mind to learning new things so I keep waiting for the OP to say something profound, but I'm pretty sure he should sum up this tread and just come out and say that he's a dusty old curmudgeon that doesn't like all these new fangled AGB's and extended gas system lengths because "back in my day we didn't have all that stuff and we got along just fine!".I can make an AR FTF by both over and under gassing the system. I think the OP's next thread will be "The Sky Isn't Blue".
I keep an open mind to learning new things so I keep waiting for the OP to say something profound, but I'm pretty sure he should sum up this tread and just come out and say that he's a dusty old curmudgeon that doesn't like all these new fangled AGB's and extended gas system lengths because "back in my day we didn't have all that stuff and we got along just fine!".
If it comes to it, I figure I can just throw a handful of Tula on the ground and the scavenger panic should be enough to allow for an escape...I figured: “I wanna run the spiciest of the spicy in 120 degree heat, suppressed…and when shtf, the crappiest steel cased puff load in Arctic conditions unsuppressed”