"Dr." Wolf is not a medical doctor, or even biological scientist - she is a political history expert, nor does she understand medical liability. I have respected her work on the "end of a democracy". (Her comments above in Epoch Times are 100 spot on).
In the past, docs aren't responsible for adverse events of a drug they recommended if they had no idea (were not informed by the pharmaceutical company); the doctors are responsible for informing patients of anything relevant in the PDR or "package insert". In the past, pharmaceutical company are liable when they don't disclose what they know to physicians. I'll give an example: Propecia (finasteride) for hair loss: docs were told up to 2% of patients could have sexual side effects that were reversible when drug is stopped. The Pharma. company knew otherwise, the side effect were sometimes permanent. Pharma. company had liability not the docs.
Vaccines are interesting and different in that the companies don't have liability - there is a general vaccine injury fund that vaccine injuries (i.e. Guillaine-Barre) get compensation from when there is clear proof. Problem here - the pharmaceutical companies supposedly wouldn't have liability because of warped speed; but shouldn't they now be liable since they knowingly committed fraud and harm undisclosed results in clinical trials and data early in release? They knew of negative outcomes and despite releasing their "private" documents, are still NOT being forward as to side effects (including death) from the vaccine. Other than myocarditis, Pfizer/Moderna/Astra Zeneca haven't really "fessed up" to many of the side effects formally. Physicians/coroners covering for them with "SAD" diagnosis is disgusting, but at this stage not illegal yet.
I don't believe doctors are going to be held liable for side effects in the "Pfizer data" until warnings come out in the medical journals and inserts. No, they are not responsible for personally reading all the thousands of Pfizer documents, and frankly they have a legal "excuse" not to be liable until the companies publicly disclose in journals/MEDwatches/PDR/inserts etc. So for now, health care providers can stick their heads in the sand (or elsewhere) and not be responsible for clinical outcomes from the jab. "They knew, they knew" Dr. Wolf said - yes, Pfizer did, but the number of doctors that knew when Pfizer knew? Big question. Some doctors consider a report like Dr. Wolf's of her "volunteers" reviewing the data (since she knew its not in her domain), to be "conspiracy theory" they just ignore; some docs still have repercussion if they disclose that to patients. To me, its absurd to be so ignorant and perpetuate mistruths and disinformation, but its still an excuse for now, and coroners can go on and use "SADS". Yes, its awful, and there should be a liability from the top down (starting with NIH heads/CDC "advising" the government to use mandates/NGOs and elitist pushing it for their own reasons, and then the pharmaceutical companies). Suing doctors will go nowhere legally or in terms of providing satisfaction.
It blows my mind that our president stills plans on pushing mandates further, and even starting in the kids under 5 to go to school or daycare, but this is Xiden. He spits out what he is told to.
Medical decisions should always be based on informed consent, which is a risk vs. benefit analysis. Both elements should be explained to the patient/guardian the relevant risks of side effects/death, as well as benefits (TRUE stats on morbidity and mortality of the virus, and how long the immunity from the jab lasts, and alternative treatments). I would be livid if a family member died of "SADS" from the jab, especially if in a low risk group...but who is responsible? There needs to be some liability for Pfizer withholding its info. that they wanted to keep silent for 75 years; a FORMAL release of the known information (including insurance company stats) should have been done long ago to all health care providers and URGENTLY needs to be done. It is such a disservice that the truth is still not really out there in any formal way to physicians or to the majority of the public (you guys here are more informed than most), but this "women are having clots" , "referee whistles" and "climate change is causing SAD" - all that BS needs to just STOP.
Its clear with all this push towards censorship/Ministry of Truth both here and in Canada, and even discussed in the result WEF/Davos talks, as well domestic terrorism to include those dispensing "false information about public health issues" (specifically jab, COVID, and MP); they aren't willing to have this publically disclosed yet. Maybe that is another reason why they want to take our guns so urgently, fear of reprisal if and when everyone finds out.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
www.c-span.org
www.yahoo.com
