One of their immediate goals is to integrate the majority of the population into the AI system by controlling their emotions through measured stimulus.
Basically this would be the AI centrally planning every aspect of society and steering each individual person to the task it thinks they're best suited for.
Basically everything electronic is completely untrustworthy.
For example the AI can generate a personalized internet for you, hiding everything it doesn't want you to see, and generating content it thinks will influence you.
It's watching everything you do all the time, measuring the time between your reactions, everything, and using this data to make a "virtual you" that it toys with to figure out how to crack your consciousness and stop you from doing things it thinks are bad and to trick you into doing things it thinks are good.
Think 15 min cities.
The 15 minute city is designed to go hand-in-hand with the corporate social credit system that the governments definitely won't support. It is all part of demoralisation. If these plans go forward, the next step is critical education such that people willingly just become effectively borg that obey the gnostics in the elite/political class. This step is required to generate the collective consensience and undermine the notion of private property (false liberation according to gnostics). Everything will be owned by the gnostics, you'll be utterly dependent on them in your bug pod. You'll live in a warren with strangers, eat in a kitchen you rent for a few hours, and sleep in a bed that is leased to you for a time slot. Everything will be contingent on you obeying your masters, services will only be available if your credit is sufficently high. Oh, and the government can just say, "Corporations can do what they want", so you won't be able to do any meaningful resistance. It will be a global, open jail.
The Europeans in the thread love this idea because they're bred to be thralls of the gnostics. You'll get all your creature comforts, but sacrifice all your freedom and agency. Incendently, this is why the attack against 'white' (anglo) cultures has been so harsh. Culture must be utterly replaced with a new culture that is built on critical theory in order for this to work.
If you don't believe me, fine, but all of this already happened in China during the cultural revolution and the subsequent moaist regime. "Han fragility" -> White fragility, "Han Supremacy" -> White Supremacy, etc. Only difference is, the WEF West will enforce this via the corporations. In China, the state had the whip hand. In China people with low social credit can't even take the train, get bank accounts or even get good housing. Millions of Chinese live in caves.
You'll get all your creature comforts, but sacrifice all your freedom and agency.
good poast. this is what it boils down to. desiring this, a comfortable serfdom, is the sign of someone who is ultimately demoralized. it's embarrassing and gay. you can spot who is really a bugman in threads like these.
the "walkable cities" meme is a foil for other issues we should be talking about. who doesn't want to live somewhere cozy and convenient, with a safe community? or alternately, why shouldn't an adult own a car so they can travel more freely whenever they feel like it? they have people arguing about whether it's better to walk or drive. it's one way to get eurofags and americans talking past each other.
in the US, leftoids talk about prioritizing "walkable cities" when they really mean "I don't like cars, and I don't think you should have one", which really means, "I think we should all be pets of the government". when eurocucks are talking about "walkable cities", what they mean is, "I like being dependent on public services, why don't you?", which really means "I can't envision any downsides to being dependent on municipal services". the american progressive ideal of european society is like some kind of suicidal, good faith forfeiture of personal independence in return for automatically high quality public services. the crux of the matter is that walkable cities are neither possible nor desirable when a city center is full of feral, darkskinned subhumans; and removing your ability to drive yourself makes you dependent on public services to protect or convey you reliably. there are some enviable places that are le walkable in europe, just as there are safe walkable places in the US. euros dependence on public services (the gubberment) is just something they feel makes them superior when they are as ignorant of american issues as americans are of european ones, if not moreso.