PortaJohn
- Thread starter Lowlight
- Start date
-
- Tags
Average is 1100, turnout averages around 55%, so normal number there is going to be 4-600 as I said. I can't say what governments have done in the past, but I can say that Benford's law applies more as numbers go up. If the maximum of votes in a precinct is, say, 900, then then the maximum size of 2bl is going to be 99. Benfords law is a law of large, but not infinite, series, and I don't think a series under a hundred is what they mean by that. That isn't to say that smaller series won't conform, but that the law holds more strongly with large numbers.
Understanding and Applying Benford’s Law
Understanding and Applying Benford's Law. Article describes what Benford’s Law is, when it could apply, & what constraints to consider applying to an IT audit.
I have NEVER seen anyone make someone else's child uncomfortable with a touch. Never saw it one time. Years of clinical work with child sexual abusers and victims, NEVER saw this forceful trespass of a child's boundaries. Not one person and not one child. Never. Adult publicly touching a child anywhere a bathing suit would cover? NOPE. Mind you this is in an arena where incest, rape, molestation, etc. have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
I have also NEVER seen a child react to an appropriate touch squeamishly or with that defensive body language. I HAVE seen children react to abusive guardians defensively. You can argue about the location of breasts, shoulders, groins, etc. But the fact that you acknowledge the presence of that discomfort, that it is "inappropriate" and yet defend it, is gross.
I have also NEVER seen a child react to an appropriate touch squeamishly or with that defensive body language. I HAVE seen children react to abusive guardians defensively. You can argue about the location of breasts, shoulders, groins, etc. But the fact that you acknowledge the presence of that discomfort, that it is "inappropriate" and yet defend it, is gross.
Dig baby dig.
Boy do you ever know how to dig a hole.
You should change your name to The Shoveler
Since this is a seemingly reasonable reply, I ask you to show me one place where I defended his behavior qua behavior. What I have said is that it is bad behavior, but not pedophilia. If that is a defense of anything, it is a defense of the definition of pedophilia because when it comes to stuff like that, stuff that awful, the definition of the disorder really matters.
Yup, just like those claiming no voter fraud..
Did you see where Bill Gates believes that prosperous countries should be eating artificial beef? I'll try finding the article.Bill Gates... on his investment in Vaccines. 20 to 1 return.
Bill Gates Deleted Documentary Why he switched from Microsoft to vaccines
Bill Gates Deleted Documentary Why he switched from Microsoft to vaccines Re-edit of Mikki WIllis' "Plandemic" Higher Quality version available on DVO: https://odysee.com/@devrijeomroep:6/bill-gates-deleted-documentary:0 - Unmasked by the Justice Department in exclusionary practices designed...www.bitchute.com
Amazing that this hadn't been reported on before this. CNN should be taken off the air.Um, like SOOOOO surprised.
BREAKING: CNN Paid Antifa Agitator at Capitol Riots — Now We've Got Receipts to Prove It
CNN & NBC paid John Earle Sullivan *TENS OF THOUSANDS* of dollars...beckernews.com
I mean, it kind of has. He was literally walking through the capitol with a fucking CNN crew.
yeah, cause they don't have husbands that will bash your stupid face in.
Maybe it's just dialysis, but the news is making my head pound. Ca this country get any more screwed up than it already is??????
I wonder if Chode irritates the fuck out of everyone around him in real life, or just all of us on the internet. 
I haven't back checked any of is info, and I realize that there are controversies on how DGUs are reported and counted. That said, there is noting I have seen in his work that makes me think it is anything but solid. I am a fan.
Probably. But as in here, I generally turn out to have been right.I wonder if Chode irritates the fuck out of everyone around him in real life, or just all of us on the internet.
I think he does his homework.
Simple tests for the extent of vote fraud with absentee and provisional ballots in the 2020 US presidential election
This study reports three tests measuring vote fraud in the 2020 US presidential election, although they provide inconsistent evidence. To isolate the impact of
papers.ssrn.com
I understand his argument, but it has a lot of theoretical holes in it. It is an interesting way of looking at it. It isn't very persuasive proof of fraud.I think he does his homework.
Simple tests for the extent of vote fraud with absentee and provisional ballots in the 2020 US presidential election
This study reports three tests measuring vote fraud in the 2020 US presidential election, although they provide inconsistent evidence. To isolate the impact ofpapers.ssrn.com
contra, and not exactly a left leaning source: https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/research/docs/comment_voterfraud_grimmer_garro_eggers.pdf
Choid, I clearly recall you promising to "go away" and stay out of the Bear Pit.
My celebration of such was clearly premature.
My celebration of such was clearly premature.
Anyone whom calls pedophilia a 'disorder' is a chode (and a retard). Is it a disorder to stick a gun in your mouth and pull the trigger? No, it's a choice, just like every other CHOICE we make in life.
Not for BL2. For BL2, extremely few would have enough data points. Remember, BL2 removes the first digit, so in order to have over 100 you would need to be over 1000 for at least one candidate in the precinct.
It's retarded because you are trying to say there are a number of applicable precincts based on simple division, without showing any applicable precincts. And even if there are some number of applicable precincts, that number is still at the low end of the scale, and would only represent a sliver of the total voting group of precincts, and it would be a self selecting sliver. It is an exercise in choosing your data to try to get your answer, not in looking at the data and using the correct tools to analyze it.
And I think it is fair to say that none of the experts in Benford's Law think it is applicable. In fact, many of them have described why this is so, based on precinct size, similarity in precinct size and other factors. It's just not the right tool for the job.
FWIW, Mebane, one of the few remaining who think it is a good test, says there are no issues with the election as far as his analysis goes. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~wmebane/inapB.pdf
Last edited:
And we don't even have Forrest Gump to show Biden his ass-wound on national TV...
Like I said, the one guy who thinks it is a reliable test is the same guy who wrote the paper that says 2020 didn't sow fraud based on that test. Seems like a conundrum. Either it isn't reliable, or it is pretty reliable and shows no fraud.
So the one guy who thinks it is useful is lying to show us that there was no fraud?
This whole line of argument has been a joke from day 1. It started out assuming fraud, then applying Benford to show it. Then when it was explained that the tool was inapplicable, we stayed with fraud and jumped to Benford 2, as though the new experts doing so knew all along that what they were suggesting at first, also as experts, was BS, but now they are sure they have the right tool. And it isn't even an accepted tool among many statisticians, but there is one guy who shows a lot of support for it. But unfortunately he says it doesn't show fraud. Conclusion? He is just explaining away the fraud because he doesn't want it to be there. Got it.
It is literally defined as a disorder in the DSM V. Not sure why this is controversial.
THANKS! Now I've got that F'd-up mental picture in my F'n HEAD!! Mac
Congratulations. You’re the smartest guy on Snipershide.
It’s actually interesting to see a guy enter an environment, find virtually zero consensus with anyone there, determine everyone else has the problem, and lecture them all about it. Nonetheless he’ll continue to bless them with his radiance lol, whether they want it or not.
FYI most all these guys you’re “educating” likely have successful careers, wives, kids, homes, and friends in abundance. They really don’t care what you think. What do you have? A little self assigned Snipershide scorecard? Showed them, lol. Why is that the only thing you can find to do on here? Pitiful.
I feel sorry for you dude. There’s something wrong with you.
Id be careful exposing an orifice in that group.
You claim to be arguing for reasonable judgment and against wild speculation.
That’s simply not true. You have stated that you don’t believe he has ever touched a child in a sexually inappropriate way or is sexually attracted to children 13 and under (the actual definition). You have no proof of his innocence.
There’s been no investigation, you haven’t had access to the findings. What’s your logic? Somebody would’ve snitched? Justice always prevails? Fallacy upon fallacy. You’re not on higher ground, you’re on the opposite side.
If you were arguing for prudence and logic, your arguments would be framed much differently. You’re hiding your real argument (which is: Biden isn’t a pedophile) with “I’m against illogical conspiracy theories”. You’re just using a forked tongue to defend him.
While I agree that logic should restrain us from declaring Joe Biden is a pedophile. It’s hard to explain these amorous interactions without sexual attraction:
I think the facts point to serious perversion. Not something I’d defend.
I watched the first two...
What a sick bastard. He was groping the girl in the red dress. Kept his hand on her side and was moving his fingers the whole time.
Castrate the mother fucker.
Doc
Last edited:
maybe chode is really big mike.
www.newsweek.com
Video Resurfaces of Michelle Obama Praising Convicted Rapist Weinstein
Video of former First Lady Michelle Obama praising convicted rapist Harvey Weinstein resurfaced on Twitter Monday in a post by the video editor for former Trump adviser Steve Bannon.
www.newsweek.com
Yea this. I stopped watching after the red dress. That motherfucker had absolutely no business with his hand on her hip. The most important bit of info he could garner was everyone’s age. Sick fuck.
New York Assemblyman Kim alleges Gov. Cuomo threatened to tank his career
"Gov. Cuomo called me directly on Thursday to threaten my career if I did not cover up for Melissa [DeRosa] and what she said. He tried to pressure me to issue a statement, and it was a very traumatizing experience," Kim said.
justthenews.com
"No man has ever spoken to me like that in my entire life," Kim said. "At some point he tried to humiliate me, asking: 'Are you a lawyer? I didn't think so. You're not a lawyer.' It almost felt like in retrospect he was trying to bait me and anger me and say something inappropriate. I'm glad I didn't."
nothing to worry about wypipo, just a PUBLIC SCHOOL PRINCIPAL!
gotta be fake?
gotta be fake?
nothing to worry about wypipo, just a PUBLIC SCHOOL PRINCIPAL!
gotta be fake?
Keep it up....you'll need ultra violet on that motherfucking pie chart.
BREAKING: Biden Gives Andrew Cuomo $50 BILLION | D.C. Swamp Watch
dcswampwatch.org
This is how civil wars get started...well historically.
Swirling the drain!!
nothing to worry about wypipo, just a PUBLIC SCHOOL PRINCIPAL!
gotta be fake?
They are currently pouring gas on the fire now......they want something to happen.
Doc
