we'll circle back on that
PortaJohn
- Thread starter Lowlight
- Start date
-
- Tags
I'm gonna jump in here and say, have you looked at how large the DSM has grown to be?
They literally have made up a disorder for fucking everything.
No disorder?
No treatment.
No treatment? No $$$$$.
Disorder? Yes.
Yes = treatment.
Treatment = $$$$$$$$
That's how simple the DSM-V is.
That's actually not necessarily true. What you are saying is true for a diagnosis, but not a disorder. For example, transgenderism used to be classified as a disorder, which it is, but was reclassified as a dysphoria. Being a dysphoria allows for $$$$$$$ for treatment without the "stigma" of having a disorder. Likewise, dislexia is considered a disability, and can get $$$$$, but is not a disorder.
Sociopathy, psychopathy etc are disorders, as is pedophilia. It isn't a euphemism, just a categorization.
In any case, I was simply trying to use the correct word. Molesting is a crime, pedophilia is a disorder. Most pedophiles, apparently, are able to constrain themselves. Or so the research says. Whatever the case, if anybody took any of my statements to be a defense of pedophilia, then I apologize. They were not.
That assumes 220 million taxpayers. I doubt that the number of people who are actually paying the freight in this country exceeds 150 or 160 million. By paying the freight, I mean net. Not EIC filers or other net leaches after bennies are deducted.
Net it is way lower than that, I imagine. Probably no more than 20%. Maybe less.
whatcha think about little girls in "beauty pageants" and people that watch them?
Virginia Voter Identified 1.7 Million Vote Difference Between State Report and Externally Reported Data But Then Couldn't Find Anyone to Address His Concerns | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft
A Virginia voter identified a 1.7 million vote difference between the final state results in the 2020 election and external results reported on Election Night. When he attempted to address his issues with authorities, no one would answer his questions.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
I think they are fucking weirdos, though I can't say I have had the displeasure of actually meeting a person like that.
If you are asking me if I think they are pedophiles, I have no idea. It is a subculture I know nothing about. It surely wouldn't surprise me, though I have always thought of it more as a group of women trying to grab on to some fantasy of a youth they never enjoyed themselves.
Last edited:
Think the people that put their kids into that are some variation of Münchhausen by proxy, not excusing it but definitely something wrong there.
i can't say all of them, but i watched a show that i could only interpret as a mom exploiting her daughter and pimping her out. they don't pose like kids and they don't wear kid clothes. they dress them up like call girls.
i can see how this could be seen as the mother enjoying her daughter's attention by proxy. the mothers are rarely beautiful.
Look at 4:25, he covers her whole breast with the right hand - the poor girl cringed..He often would put his hand on the right upper arm so he could try to touch their side breast - if you slow it down and go to full screen you can see his fingers moving pressing down or in (ie. at 6:09). The girl Jess, that didn't pull away, got her own photo while her father said "Dad is going to stay pretty close"; 7:45 - same things with another girl, 9:06-9:10 he's touching half her upper right breast and even upper on the left, the girl in gray @ 11:23 actually catches on to his trick and keeps moving her right arm farther and farther away from her chest..
He did the same thing to this adult female, although the other woman complained about the kiss
and the protective grandfather move by Sessions:
Last edited:
Sorry I cant watch that shit. My step daughter was raped by her biological father when she was 9. Then he tried to drown her afterwards.
Doc
Gotta admit, this might not be the best representation for responsible gun ownership and use
(I believe she's a mother of four kids)
I couldn't help but wonder if there's a way to get a close up of the scope.
Anyone know which one it is?
Fuck the pansies and their fears.
Anyone know which one it is?
Fuck the pansies and their fears.
Gotta admit, this might not be the best representation for responsible gun ownership and use
Gotta admit, this might not be the best representation for responsible gun ownership and use
How many times do we have to repeat that appeasing the fucking leftists gains us NOTHING. They don't give a shit how we store our guns, they will ALWAYS find something wrong with it.
In any case, you neither know nor are qualified to judge Boebert's home situation and firearm storage security.
Hope her biological father is pushing up weeds
Hes got 34 years left. I got thrown out of the trial for losing my shit. He will be 78 when he gets out. No parole chance either.Hope her biological father is pushing up weeds
Doc
Calling out her bullshit isn't appeasement. It's clear she posed those weapons as props, got called out on it, and then doubled-down on her stupidity. Not a good look for our community.
Also, anyone who was triggered by the mere appearance of firearms on their Zoom screen can fuck off.
One of the reasons I somewhat believe the narrative that tons of the people at the top of the food chain are sexual predators is the stories women tell me at work. (I work in a place where these types of stories are going to get told due to the role I am in).
Their stories either star a man who is a loner and didn’t get out much - or it’s the powerful family patriarch. Or drugs/alchohol. Or two of the above.
People that fancy themselves patriarchs are a key source of political ambition and/or corporate leadership.
Let's just assume for a second that you know her motivations for putting those rifles and pistols on the shelf behind her. So the fuck what? It's her home to do as she pleases and not your home to dictate what's right or wrong.
The second sentence in your post above is truly the height of irony.
He got 45 years total. Nowhere even close to being enough. This was after I spent almost 80k in lawyers trying to get custody of the children. We think he also tried to drown my youngest because he was afraid of the bathtub for so long he would not take baths and my wife had to be in there to shower him, but we could never prove anything.That seems like too short of a sentence
Doc
The room itself could be secure. Heavy steel door, or a vault door or just locking etc.
Or, perhaps they are simply put up in the safe each day.
Hardly know the circumstances, but by all means...call it out lol.
Or, perhaps they are simply put up in the safe each day.
Hardly know the circumstances, but by all means...call it out lol.
I remember when "our community" used to display firearms in glass front beautiful furniture as a source of pride in the home.
Now we hide them in blocks of steel in shame.
Granted I understand the safety issue but the question should be......How did we survive than without people breaking in to our houses and stealing our shit or how come we didnt worry about every depressed person coming along and wanting to use our shit to kill themselves?
Sounds like we got a society problem not a gun problem.
It's not bullshit. It's her right. We are past the point of appeasing the communist tools. Double down on stupidity? Really? We are past the point of no return. We are not going to win them over. If it "Triggers" the left them so be it. They need it shoved up their asses on a daily basis.
Amid Capitol riot, FBI released files from Kennedy-era investigation into Nancy Pelosi's father
In a 1961 memo to the White House, an agent summarized allegations that Thomas D'Alesandro, Jr. took payoffs from applicants to the police force, and helped to hinder the investigation and prosecution of crimes.
justthenews.com
ChrisAndDebbie on Gab: 'IMPEACH PELOSI -- Looks Like She Is The One With …'
ChrisAndDebbie on Gab: 'IMPEACH PELOSI -- Looks Like She Is The One With Something To Hide About The January 6th Riot At The Capitol * Why did she deny national guard support on January 4th? * What conversations did she or her staff give the Sergeant at Arms specific to January 6th? * Why...
Didn’t some Dems have pics of Mao, Che, or Pol Pot displayed during Zoom meetings or interviews? Strange those don’t get the same level of anger.
Amid Capitol riot, FBI released files from Kennedy-era investigation into Nancy Pelosi's father
In a 1961 memo to the White House, an agent summarized allegations that Thomas D'Alesandro, Jr. took payoffs from applicants to the police force, and helped to hinder the investigation and prosecution of crimes.
Old news and released exactly when it was to put it in the Memoryhole.
ChrisAndDebbie on Gab: 'IMPEACH PELOSI -- Looks Like She Is The One With …'
ChrisAndDebbie on Gab: 'IMPEACH PELOSI -- Looks Like She Is The One With Something To Hide About The January 6th Riot At The Capitol * Why did she deny national guard support on January 4th? * What conversations did she or her staff give the Sergeant at Arms specific to January 6th? * Why...gab.com
All relevant questions....none to ever be answered.
Art and pictures of Mao aren't the same thing. And she didn't lose to the soy boy, she lost to the preacher. Any other questions?
How is it not the same? Buying a $3k painting of a Communist dictator for display in your home is a political statement. Making sure it’s displayed during an interview is also a political statement. Displaying a weapon while engaging with political opponents is also a statement.
So in chode’s mind, since it’s a painting and not a photograph it’s ok? Just seeing if I got that right. Not a surprising statement from pedo-Xiden’s biggest fan.
My AR15 is a motherfukin' piece of godamn art too.
So a 3’x5’ Hitler canvas over the fireplace is okay because it’s art? Holy shit, I’ll run that by the wife when we redecorate the living room.
Here you go. Art. Famous painter too. I'm sure this would be ok to put in your home for zoom backdrop.
NOTHING means nothing. Everything you see, means something. The fact that you don't see it isn't a character flaws at all. You can't help it that you are blind.
Imagine this hanging in a Repubs zoom background.
I don't know what to tell you guys. If you have Warhol Cambell's Soup cans up, it doesn't mean that you like Campbell's Soup. If you have his electric chair silkscreens up, it doesn't mean you like the death penalty. Same with his work with guns in it. Doesn't mean you are pro gun. Art isn't always about the subject of the piece, it is often much deeper than that. I realize that I, apparently, have run in different circles from you all in my life, so I am not surprised to see people think that having a Warhol Mao makes you a commie on here.
I have a confederate battle flag hanging in my living room. Is that art?
