• Win an RIX Storm S3 Thermal Imaging Scope!

    To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!

    Join the contest Subscribe

PortaJohn

r/iamverysmart types. Too familiar. Almost cliche. High IQ, high paying white collar office jobs, manicures and pedicures every 14 hours. Italian sports car fleet. 12+ inch dicks. Abnormally high sperm and telomere counts. Degrees in social engineering, breeding, and eugenics. Sick fedora and Japanese sword collections. Anime experts. However, some are not smart enough to avoid chatting up suspicious looking Twitter and Telegram accounts with loli profile pics

 
Last edited:
Yes they have links. Did you look at them? The first 5 are links to newspapers that require a subscription. The 6th is a complete lie. Not only does it not predict an Ice Age but they also state multiple times that they will not be doing any forecasting. Exactly what you would expect from a Koch/Exxon organization. Do you know who did some very accurate forecasting? Exxon.




View attachment 7994098
(((Consensus))) is not fact. The fact is, Co2 is not a pollutant. It is literally pumped into greenhouses. It’s literally a lie used to excuse irrational power and money grabs. Simple as.
 
(((Consensus))) is not fact. The fact is, Co2 is not a pollutant. It is literally pumped into greenhouses. It’s literally a lie used to excuse irrational power and money grabs. Simple as.
You are fighting the unthinking, and it will only end in your frustration. If he cannot figure out the CO2 is taken in by plants, the oxygen is thrown off and the carbon used by the plants for growth I'm not sure that there is anything you guys are saying that can assist this malformed thought process.
Slide3.jpg
photosynthesis_456.png
 
Last edited:
You are fighting the unthinking, and it will only end in your frustration. If he cannot figure out the CO2 is taken in by plants, the oxygen is thrown off and the carbon used by the plants for growth I'm not sure that there is anything you guys are saying that can assist this malformed thought process.View attachment 7994207
Wait a second...are you using some type of "old" science to argue that trees and other plants are good for the Earth? What? No freaking way man. Even worse is that your "living graph" shows that plants may actually need CO2...what science is this..something learned back in day?
That narrative doesn't fit well with the Marxists scorched Earth policy now..."c'mon man"...get with the program... :) :) :) :)
 
Wait a second...are you using some type of "old" science to argue that trees and other plants are good for the Earth? What? No freaking way man. Even worse is that your "living graph" shows that plants may actually need CO2...what science is this..something learned back in day?
That narrative doesn't fit well with the Marxists scorched Earth policy now..."c'mon man"...get with the program... :) :) :) :)
Yup. And I will go a step further: what if the CO2 emitted by volcanoes and man are actually increasing the fauna because of this fictional massive increase in CO2? THAT is actually a pretty interesting question. Back in the day we know that CO2 levels were much higher and plants nor animals died from it - the entire complex actually prospered. Even the giant bugs, but fuck them.
 
Yup. And I will go a step further: what if the CO2 emitted by volcanoes and man are actually increasing the fauna because of this fictional massive increase in CO2? THAT is actually a pretty interesting question. Back in the day we know that CO2 levels were much higher and plants nor animals died from it - the entire complex actually prospered. Even the giant bugs, but fuck them.
There must be more CO2 in Texas (probably due to all the PETROLEUM distillates). Because they have some big arse cockroaches!!!! Okay, yes, they like to call them palmetto bugs...they are cockroaches!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I always like to point out the the climate folks...Mt. Pinatubo 1991!!!!!!!!! More shtuff spewed out of that thing than pretty much all automobiles in history of mankind!!! Now add it Mt. St. Helens, the Icelandic 2010 volcano and that thing under water than blew this year; and in the last 40 years volcanos have added a lot more "shtuff" than mankind! That's in 40 years!!!! Let's go back 100-200 more years and see!!

The Earth is not static!!!! Hard for some to accept, but the Earth is an ACTIVE ecosystem and that includes folks living on it. Earth WILL take care of itself without our "help."
 
Wait a second...are you using some type of "old" science to argue that trees and other plants are good for the Earth? What? No freaking way man. Even worse is that your "living graph" shows that plants may actually need CO2...what science is this..something learned back in day?
That narrative doesn't fit well with the Marxists scorched Earth policy now..."c'mon man"...get with the program... :) :) :) :)
Maybe the big brain would understand this better. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

1667925620149.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mwalex and lariat
I admit it’s not very challenging beating up on the mentally disabled but I keep getting notices that Repubtards are quoting me.
You'd have to actually answer questions to do that.
Let me guess, extreme self esteem issues, so you're happy to go along with the crowd, even if it's folks so absurd they say people w/o a uterus shouldn't have an opinion on abortion, while simultaneously saying men can give birth?
 
Last edited:
Maybe the big brain would understand this better. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

View attachment 7994265
Wait a minute, you just hold on. Did we just also provide evidence for our young WEF acolyte that plants have a krebs cycle? Did we also just prove that the carbs from the plants we eat came from CO2 and the resulting glucose stored in them? Its almost basic...