Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!
Join the contest SubscribeIt's a lot more normal than Twitter and such places where liberals love to congregate......It's funny you consider the portajohn normal.
(((Consensus))) is not fact. The fact is, Co2 is not a pollutant. It is literally pumped into greenhouses. It’s literally a lie used to excuse irrational power and money grabs. Simple as.Yes they have links. Did you look at them? The first 5 are links to newspapers that require a subscription. The 6th is a complete lie. Not only does it not predict an Ice Age but they also state multiple times that they will not be doing any forecasting. Exactly what you would expect from a Koch/Exxon organization. Do you know who did some very accurate forecasting? Exxon.
![]()
“There is no doubt”: Exxon Knew CO2 Pollution Was A Global Threat By Late 1970s | The Narwhal
Throughout Exxon’s global operations, the company knew that CO2 was a harmful pollutant in the atmosphere years earlier than previously reported. DeSmog has uncovered Exxon corporate documents from the late 1970s stating unequivocally “there is no doubt” that CO2 from the burning of fossil fuels...thenarwhal.ca
View attachment 7994098
I doubt you'll understand this but....Since my IQ is at least 40 points higher than yours what does that make you?
@MrBlond , so will this stop that nasty global warming now......![]()
U.N. Tells Rich Countries to Pay $2 Trillion a Year for Climate 'Justice'
An annual transfer of around $2 trillion from rich countries is needed in the name of climate "justice" according to a U.N.-backed report.www.breitbart.com
You are fighting the unthinking, and it will only end in your frustration. If he cannot figure out the CO2 is taken in by plants, the oxygen is thrown off and the carbon used by the plants for growth I'm not sure that there is anything you guys are saying that can assist this malformed thought process.(((Consensus))) is not fact. The fact is, Co2 is not a pollutant. It is literally pumped into greenhouses. It’s literally a lie used to excuse irrational power and money grabs. Simple as.
Wait a second...are you using some type of "old" science to argue that trees and other plants are good for the Earth? What? No freaking way man. Even worse is that your "living graph" shows that plants may actually need CO2...what science is this..something learned back in day?You are fighting the unthinking, and it will only end in your frustration. If he cannot figure out the CO2 is taken in by plants, the oxygen is thrown off and the carbon used by the plants for growth I'm not sure that there is anything you guys are saying that can assist this malformed thought process.View attachment 7994207
If your IQ is so high, why do you constantly dodge questions?Since my IQ is at least 40 points higher than yours what does that make you?
His silence is damning......If your IQ is so high, why do you constantly dodge questions?
You sound tripple vaxed...'cause yer so smart!Since my IQ is at least 40 points higher than yours what does that make you?
It is pure irony this little kerfuffle between you and Chikn. He spent a good part of his life filtering turds like you.Since my IQ is at least 40 points higher than yours what does that make you?
Yup. And I will go a step further: what if the CO2 emitted by volcanoes and man are actually increasing the fauna because of this fictional massive increase in CO2? THAT is actually a pretty interesting question. Back in the day we know that CO2 levels were much higher and plants nor animals died from it - the entire complex actually prospered. Even the giant bugs, but fuck them.Wait a second...are you using some type of "old" science to argue that trees and other plants are good for the Earth? What? No freaking way man. Even worse is that your "living graph" shows that plants may actually need CO2...what science is this..something learned back in day?
That narrative doesn't fit well with the Marxists scorched Earth policy now..."c'mon man"...get with the program...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The I’m not gay but my boyfriend is line. Keep taking it on the chin, slugger.Since my IQ is at least 40 points higher than yours what does that make you?
Riddle me this;Since my IQ is at least 40 points higher than yours what does that make you?
There must be more CO2 in Texas (probably due to all the PETROLEUM distillates). Because they have some big arse cockroaches!!!! Okay, yes, they like to call them palmetto bugs...they are cockroaches!!!!!!!!!!!!!Yup. And I will go a step further: what if the CO2 emitted by volcanoes and man are actually increasing the fauna because of this fictional massive increase in CO2? THAT is actually a pretty interesting question. Back in the day we know that CO2 levels were much higher and plants nor animals died from it - the entire complex actually prospered. Even the giant bugs, but fuck them.
Riddle me this;
If you're so smart and everyone else here is so stupid, shouldn't you at least be smart enough to go somewhere else (and not come back) ? Hmmm?![]()
Well, if there was any doubt as to the real motivation with @MrBlond he is a liberal cunt trying to educate us dirty, dumb conservatives.I admit it’s not very challenging beating up on the mentally disabled but I keep getting notices that Repubtards are quoting me.
Oh, so you're lazy too ?I admit it’s not very challenging beating up on the mentally disabled but I keep getting notices that Repubtards are quoting me.
If you give the fish enough line you can usually get some good play out of it and the truth will come out before the hook is thrown.Well, if there was any doubt as to the real motivation with @MrBlond he is a liberal cunt trying to educate us dirty, dumb conservatives.
Maybe the big brain would understand this better.Wait a second...are you using some type of "old" science to argue that trees and other plants are good for the Earth? What? No freaking way man. Even worse is that your "living graph" shows that plants may actually need CO2...what science is this..something learned back in day?
That narrative doesn't fit well with the Marxists scorched Earth policy now..."c'mon man"...get with the program...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You'd have to actually answer questions to do that.I admit it’s not very challenging beating up on the mentally disabled but I keep getting notices that Repubtards are quoting me.
ITs not challenging, but its fun. That why we keep quoting you.I admit it’s not very challenging beating up on the mentally disabled but I keep getting notices that Repubtards are quoting me.
Wait a minute, you just hold on. Did we just also provide evidence for our young WEF acolyte that plants have a krebs cycle? Did we also just prove that the carbs from the plants we eat came from CO2 and the resulting glucose stored in them? Its almost basic...
We better stop before he starts with the nude selfies.
You LIAR!!! That’s not what my mommy said!Most people who know their IQ found it out because they were evaluated for special education.