Re: Premier light tactical
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jAXDIALATION</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I'm the same. I'm only shooting to 850, but when conditions support it, I like to crank it up.
I've got optics here at the house that will LOAF at 1000x. But if you are going to be a mag whore, you've also got to be an aperture whore. The March only has a 42mm objective. <span style="color: #3366FF">A 56mm scope will probably gather almost 2x the light of a 42</span>.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Goin'Hot</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> I'm a mag whore.
For ME, the March 3-24X seems to be the better option. I called Kelby's today and a non ill. F-1 with the FML-1 runs $2230. </div></div> </div></div>
The light tac has a 50mm objective and in my opinion it lacks the overall adjustment and mag for my application. I fully understand the restriction that the 42mm obj will put on the optic in regards to light transmission and eyebox. I personally would rather have additional elevation and mag avalible, even if it means that the best function of the March would be at 20X and below.
When compairing the 2 scopes, on paper, I would rather have the March. This is assuming that compactness and weight are the primary considerations of the OP. I run 5-25 PH's on my long range rigs. Love'em but, they are BIG & BULKY.
I still need to lay behind the March and I called Kelby's today about doing just that.