Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have an LMT MWS with an 18 inch 6.5 CM Bartlein barrel… that barrel produces the same velocities as a 24in LMT 65CM…The barrel is my current issue. I'm going to cut it or get of the rifle all together and go with a AR-10 platform.
Why do you regret cutting it to 20 ?
You can get a 6.5CM barrel from KRG…I want a green 6.5, why isn’t that a factory configuration?
That would be awesome, also if you are able to take a picture side by side/ top view ?
?You have no idea how close to the truth that picture is… If you knew my name
I'm trying to catch up to you
Thanks for sharing this info. it is very helpful!View attachment 7786025
So, both shown with standard brake config, TRG on the left and Tikka Tac A1 on the right. Sako’s barrel is thicker. It measures .86” on the calipers towards the crown and the Tikka measures .79”. So the Sako is .07” thicker there. I believe this matches the specs above that someone else listed. *Edit* I just went and looked at the specs someone else provided and my Sako TRG measures thicker than what they provided, more inline with what they are calling the Arctic addition. The TRG is also significantly larger on the shank end than the Tikka. I hope that helps. Both are 1/4moa Guns with factory Ammo tho as long as you do your part. Sorry it took a minute to get these. I don’t keep them in the same location. My other .308’s with custom barrels measure .96” and .97” in the same location. Just for added info. One is a Bartlein and one is a Rock Creek.
I have a VERY German name.
And your parents willingly made their choice after WWII?I have a VERY German name.
Same as mine so im sure it’s safe to say that the spec is .86” or 22mm for Sako TRG barrels. Not sure where the .82 came from someone posted earlier. Oh, and I hate you!!! I love the Vision Chassis! How do you like it?Germany was pretty destroyed…
View attachment 7786551View attachment 7786552
22mm barrel on my TRG22
And your parents willingly made their choice after WWII?
That chassis looks AWESOME!It is the ONLY chassis the compares to the TRG stocks.
No shit, it’s fantastic. The knuckle for the folder came today and took a few minutes to install. Little blue Loctite, nothing too crazy, and we’re ready to go!
One day. I’m still rocking the W3 folding backhalf with a spigot mount for now.It is the ONLY chassis the compares to the TRG stocks.
No shit, it’s fantastic. The knuckle for the folder came today and took a few minutes to install. Little blue Loctite, nothing too crazy, and we’re ready to go!
What suppressor are you running? I’m still rocking a 30P1 haha. All my stuff is old school.Germany was pretty destroyed…
View attachment 7786551View attachment 7786552
22mm barrel on my TRG22
If you have the opportunity, the current TRG folder is the shit…
View attachment 7786873View attachment 7786874
Specifically, its every bit as good as the OEM stock, BUT its completely adjustable without the need for spacers.
Plus, no need for bag or bag rider… the M10 style rear height adjustment is fantastic… course and fine adjustment.
Because I too have a bunch of old suppressors, I’m currently running a 338 Phantom on both the 300wm and the 308. The OE barrels have M1 x 18 threads an YHM doesn’t have or never made that threading for the 30 cal Phantoms adapters.What suppressor are you running? I’m still rocking a 30P1 haha. All my stuff is old school.
Agreed, it is an awesome piece of kit! However I prefer the Sako fixed stock over any other style (even with its lack of adjustments compared to the folder and the chassis options) solely for the ergonomics of the thumb position. The open top vertical grip as found on the TRG, KRG Bravo, a lot of the Manners and McMillan options allows for the most natural firing hand position. But that is just me…If you have the opportunity, the current TRG folder is the shit…
View attachment 7786873View attachment 7786874
Specifically, its every bit as good as the OEM stock, BUT its completely adjustable without the need for spacers.
Plus, no need for bag or bag rider… the M10 style rear height adjustment is fantastic… course and fine adjustment.
you can try going 20 un-supressed 308 and see if it brings back the old glory!Reason for regretting the 20" is mostly because I went from a plain 26" barrel to a suppressed 20" (Ase Utra QD suppressor over an Ase Utra flashhider). So it's not only cutting it to 20", its the combination of going from 26" and unsuppressed down to 20" and suppressed.
The rifle became more compact, easier to fit in a car and everything but I found that for the shooting I love to do running a suppressor just isnt that great. Also while the 308 feed and functioned perfectly I've been having some very minir feeding issues with the Creedmoor. They are very minor but I cant shake the fact that the 308 just worked, all the time, every time.
All in all I've gone from a 26" 308 with an effective range of 1000 yards that I would absolutely trust in any situation (fighting or competition) to a rifle I don't trust with a range of 12-1400 yards.
The TRG-22 was my go to. Now its my 308 AW.
question for youGermany was pretty destroyed…
View attachment 7786551View attachment 7786552
22mm barrel on my TRG22
did you mean barrels?PVA also offers prefit shouldered batteries for the TRG. I have used them and they are excellent. All you need is a barrel vise and action wrench.
Ha, yep. Damn autocorrect. I'll fix it.did you mean barrels?
Interesting. I shoot a lot of .308’s at 20” suppressed and it’s damn near perfect for me. My only gripe and something I haven’t figured out yet is that now when I do shoot suppressed the bolt lift is ridiculous, damn near have to be Arnold to unstick that damn thing. Only thing I can think of is I’m getting some kind of carbon ring or something funny about the brass that I cannot visually make out. Any ideas?Reason for regretting the 20" is mostly because I went from a plain 26" barrel to a suppressed 20" (Ase Utra QD suppressor over an Ase Utra flashhider). So it's not only cutting it to 20", its the combination of going from 26" and unsuppressed down to 20" and suppressed.
The rifle became more compact, easier to fit in a car and everything but I found that for the shooting I love to do running a suppressor just isnt that great. Also while the 308 feed and functioned perfectly I've been having some very minir feeding issues with the Creedmoor. They are very minor but I cant shake the fact that the 308 just worked, all the time, every time.
All in all I've gone from a 26" 308 with an effective range of 1000 yards that I would absolutely trust in any situation (fighting or competition) to a rifle I don't trust with a range of 12-1400 yards.
The TRG-22 was my go to. Now its my 308 AW.
That is the spacer that was there between chassis and butt stock before he put the folder knuckle in. Yeah, a bit confusing but you can see that they both are the same width so adding the knuckle doesn't change LOP.what is the black box/cube above the folder hinge?
I was going to ask where you got the TRG that fires plasma…Ha, yep. Damn autocorrect. I'll fix it.
Increased back pressure resulting in hot loads?Interesting. I shoot a lot of .308’s at 20” suppressed and it’s damn near perfect for me. My only gripe and something I haven’t figured out yet is that now when I do shoot suppressed the bolt lift is ridiculous, damn near have to be Arnold to unstick that damn thing. Only thing I can think of is I’m getting some kind of carbon ring or something funny about the brass that I cannot visually make out. Any ideas?
You did? haha...I can't keep up with you, my friend. I'm not even in the same shopping league! hahagiven that I just got a new TRG42A1.
Actually, I traded 2 TRG42s for it…Can’t hide money !
Well if you know anyone selling another I know someone looking.Actually, I traded 2 TRG42s for it…
that would be meWell if you know anyone selling another I know someone looking.
I was thinking about that grey multi-cam. looks awesomeCustoms built rifles are cool but there’s something about racking the bolt on these 3 that’s satisfying.
Unless you have a really good reason, get a Spuhr and be done with it.Can I get some of y’all’s opinions on direct mounted Optilock scope mount vs. a scope base and rings/mount of choice? Considering Sako p/n S151F972 or a Near rail and maybe ARC M-brace, though the 1.25” is a bit tall.
In both scope base and mount? That’s a nearly $600 solution and I don’t understand what a Near mount gets me over a similar American or European (big Era-Tac or Tier One fan for some reason) mount.Near is the way to go on the TRG.
That isn’t an option, I have my reasons. Move forward with the assumption that Spuhr doesn’t exist.Unless you have a really good reason, get a Spuhr and be done with it.
In both scope base and mount? That’s a nearly $600 solution and I don’t understand what a Near mount gets me over a similar American or European (big Era-Tac or Tier One fan for some reason) mount.
That isn’t an option, I have my reasons. Move forward with the assumption that Spuhr doesn’t exist.