Interesting thread. Here's my take:
1) Fraudi should be hanged like they did to those in Nuremburg! Or maybe he'll go out like that pufter Herman Goering.
2) I will not have the mRNA vaccine. These protein spikes are a bit scary IMO. From my understanding these things cause a lot of issues in humans when running amok. I personally do not think we have a good enough understanding at this point to use them (mRNA) except in extreme cases (knowing it's an experimental drug...yet, this is being pushed as fully vetted). If I had life threatening cancer; then hell yes, sign me up for experimental drugs if I'm a lost cause with normal treatment.
3) To say that there are limited side effects ( "not extreme") is just bullshit. DYING is not a limited side effect. Sure, people die of vaccines and have for years, but VAERS shows that dying is EXTREMELY rare with most vaccines...but not with this new vaccine. Just go look at VAERS and read the data...and at the same time...keep in mind this is VERY short term data. We are a cocky species of creature and think that we have found a panacea because "we are so smart."
4) Certainly I fully support limited trials of mRNA vaccines; but only when we fully understand the side effects LONG TERM (5,10,15,20 years) then and only then do I believe I'd be interested. There is GREAT potential here; and I mean great. But rushing something out is a recipe for disaster. As a firearms analogy I'll reference Remington R51 as released too soon.
5) Unless computer modeling has gotten so much better in microbiology and MILLIONS, if not BILLIONS, of Monte Carlo runs have been made on interactions - screw that!!!!!!!! (Keeping in mind, the results are only as good as the truth model).
1) Fraudi should be hanged like they did to those in Nuremburg! Or maybe he'll go out like that pufter Herman Goering.
2) I will not have the mRNA vaccine. These protein spikes are a bit scary IMO. From my understanding these things cause a lot of issues in humans when running amok. I personally do not think we have a good enough understanding at this point to use them (mRNA) except in extreme cases (knowing it's an experimental drug...yet, this is being pushed as fully vetted). If I had life threatening cancer; then hell yes, sign me up for experimental drugs if I'm a lost cause with normal treatment.
3) To say that there are limited side effects ( "not extreme") is just bullshit. DYING is not a limited side effect. Sure, people die of vaccines and have for years, but VAERS shows that dying is EXTREMELY rare with most vaccines...but not with this new vaccine. Just go look at VAERS and read the data...and at the same time...keep in mind this is VERY short term data. We are a cocky species of creature and think that we have found a panacea because "we are so smart."
4) Certainly I fully support limited trials of mRNA vaccines; but only when we fully understand the side effects LONG TERM (5,10,15,20 years) then and only then do I believe I'd be interested. There is GREAT potential here; and I mean great. But rushing something out is a recipe for disaster. As a firearms analogy I'll reference Remington R51 as released too soon.
5) Unless computer modeling has gotten so much better in microbiology and MILLIONS, if not BILLIONS, of Monte Carlo runs have been made on interactions - screw that!!!!!!!! (Keeping in mind, the results are only as good as the truth model).