Rifle Scopes Scope for 300 NM, is 16x enough?

300_BLK

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Aug 20, 2014
70
85
DownUnder
I need to put glass on my Lone Peak custom 300 Norma.

It will be a crossover rifle for local long range matches and hunting here in NZ. I want to shoot to 2km and most matches are 400m - 1700m.

I have Hawken hybrid LR rings with 25 MOA and a Proof Sendero barrel.

I am torn between a 5-25 Minox MR4 or the NF ATACR 4-16 Tremor 3.

Is 16x enough mag!?

Thanks
 
I’d suggest a little more mag personally, others may disagree. In NZ, you are blessed with excellent
viewing conditions with clean air and low temperatures a lot of the time, which allows higher mag
to be used. At least 25x can be very useful trying to spot impacts and misses at ELR distances: just
like horsepower you don’t have to use it all the time, but it’s great when you need it. Seeing misses
in all that green grass you have over there can be tough, more zoom is your friend in that situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 300_BLK
Custom Mosin Nagant I think

Custom Mosin Nagant? Here you go:
i-Xx8jH5C-L.jpg


ILya
 
I'm trying to decide the same thing for my new rifle in same calibre, have fitted a NSX 5.5-22 x 56 for now.

Looked at MK5's in 5-25 and 7-35 but cant decide nor on reticle
 
  • Like
Reactions: flyright
Plenty of magnification for 1200m last weekend. Good FOV and splash observed. Really enjoying the MilXT from NF, reliable for dialing and holding over.

Even managed to get some Lapua brass in NZ which is like moon rocks!

Shooting well with the 225ELDM and RL33 @ 3020 FPS. 1/2moa but capable of better, shooter needs more practice.
 

Attachments

  • 17EC3A18-5D78-4CCF-B87C-C77C114AB293.jpeg
    17EC3A18-5D78-4CCF-B87C-C77C114AB293.jpeg
    1,008.5 KB · Views: 54
  • 0A422F66-2AA3-4793-A4B9-B3E930E3885F.jpeg
    0A422F66-2AA3-4793-A4B9-B3E930E3885F.jpeg
    434.1 KB · Views: 69
  • FEDAB43D-775C-4FEE-9ED7-DFAA48484638.jpeg
    FEDAB43D-775C-4FEE-9ED7-DFAA48484638.jpeg
    366.8 KB · Views: 88
  • 22B5DABA-62F7-49D5-ACA1-9CDDA21E745C.jpeg
    22B5DABA-62F7-49D5-ACA1-9CDDA21E745C.jpeg
    387.3 KB · Views: 65
I have a K624i with AMR reticle on my .300NM.

Of course its all personal opinion, but I think the AMR reticle is about perfect for ELR work. Love the christmas tree reticle with the 0.2 mil graduations on both the elevation and windage axis'. Floating center dot. 39 mils of elevation graduations in the reticle, and plenty on the windage side. Definitely doesn't feel as "busy" as you would think when you get behind the scope.

Unfortunately I don't think this reticle is offered in the new K525, but I'm fairly certain there are dealers out there that still have stock of the K624 with AMR.
 
You should try to match your scope to the rifle(a big long scope on a compact rifle looks goofy, and by the same token a 2.5x compact scope on a 26inch barreled .264 Win looks just as goofy). But having said that know that sometimes you have to take something that looks a little "off" to get the job done. A 2.5x fixed power is too little scope for a 22/250. A 4x12 is too much scope for a 45/70. Your .300 Win mag is a reach out and touch someone caliber. If you're going to use it for everything(load light bullets for varmints, heavier bullets for big game),a 4x16 would probably be a good fit. If it is a big game only rifle, you won't need all that magnification unless you hunt where you will be getting mostly very long shots. I like Leupold, Burris, Nikon, and Millet scopes
with an unapologetic preference for Leupold. I know these are my personal opinions and yes everyone has a couple. Hope these help.