Is there an easy way to level a scopes reticle? I tried using feeler gauges, I think my mount may not be level after seeing my results. Anyone use the wheeler scope level kit?
Thanks
Sean
Thanks
Sean
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
With the rifle leveled using a spirit level attached to the scope base; align the vertical cross hair with a plumb line in the distance.
Confirm that the vertical travel of the scope’s erector tube coincides with the vertical cross hair by shooting a tall target test. Adjust as necessary to ensure that the direction of adjustment is plumb when the rifle is held level.
The external envelope of the scope is functionally irrelevant and is only coincidentally aligned with the internals.
The objective of the exercise is to ensure that the axis of the bore lies on the plane described by the vertical adjustment of the cross hairs.
Is there an easy way to level a scopes reticle? I tried using feeler gauges, I think my mount may not be level after seeing my results. Anyone use the wheeler scope level kit?
Thanks
Sean
I am not sure, it is a manners with a mini chassis, custom rifle. I had the feeler gauge and when I tightened it up and it just didn't look right.Is your action canted in the stock? I've seen that on my Savage, when it was in a B&C Medalist. The feeler gauges always gets me straight up level....
The only thing that is important is that your scope is level to the world when you shoot.
Vertical reticle axis aligned with gravity and directly over bore.
It never looks "right" to me when mine is actually level. Lazy21 and his buddies all had a good laugh at my experience one day at ASC when looking through scopes I had mounted using the plumb line method. Apparently they were all canted, despite the fact that I had hung a plumb line from the kid's swing set and lined up the vertical axis with it before torquing down. One of the guys was nice enough to remount one of them for me on the spot. He used an atlas bipod, got the rifle level by putting a level on the scope rail, locking up the bipod, then mounted the scope and put a level on the flat top of the elevation turret, got the two levels exactly aligned, then slowly and METHODICALLY torqued the rings down, zig-zagging back and forth from screw to screw while keeping the level on the turret to make sure it didn't become unlevel during the tightening process, which is extremely important. They all agreed it was now truly level, and when I got behind the rifle and looked through the scope the reticle seemed canted as it could be! They told me it was because i was so used to doing it wrong. I now use this method while using the two levels from the wheeler kit. They all still look canted to me. I also mount an external level now.I am not sure, it is a manners with a mini chassis, custom rifle. I had the feeler gauge and when I tightened it up and it just didn't look right.
It never looks "right" to me when mine is actually level. Lazy21 and his buddies all had a good laugh at my experience one day at ASC when looking through scopes I had mounted using the plumb line method. Apparently they were all canted, despite the fact that I had hung a plumb line from the kid's swing set and lined up the vertical axis with it before torquing down. One of the guys was nice enough to remount one of them for me on the spot. He used an atlas bipod, got the rifle level by putting a level on the scope rail, locking up the bipod, then mounted the scope and put a level on the flat top of the elevation turret, got the two levels exactly aligned, then slowly and METHODICALLY torqued the rings down, zig-zagging back and forth from screw to screw while keeping the level on the turret to make sure it didn't become unlevel during the tightening process, which is extremely important. They all agreed it was now truly level, and when I got behind the rifle and looked through the scope the reticle seemed canted as it could be! They told me it was because i was so used to doing it wrong. I now use this method while using the two levels from the wheeler kit. They all still look canted to me. I also mount an external level now.
This will be an ongoing battle, and I'm not sure I'm even winning it now.
Just read through part of this. Looks like there are much better methods than the one I'm using. I'll be looking into the boresighting method in more detail.
Vertical reticle axis aligned with gravity.
FTFY
Directly over bore is overrated.
It never looks "right" to me when mine is actually level. Lazy21 and his buddies all had a good laugh at my experience one day at ASC when looking through scopes I had mounted using the plumb line method. Apparently they were all canted, despite the fact that I had hung a plumb line from the kid's swing set and lined up the vertical axis with it before torquing down. One of the guys was nice enough to remount one of them for me on the spot. He used an atlas bipod, got the rifle level by putting a level on the scope rail, locking up the bipod, then mounted the scope and put a level on the flat top of the elevation turret, got the two levels exactly aligned, then slowly and METHODICALLY torqued the rings down, zig-zagging back and forth from screw to screw while keeping the level on the turret to make sure it didn't become unlevel during the tightening process, which is extremely important. They all agreed it was now truly level, and when I got behind the rifle and looked through the scope the reticle seemed canted as it could be! They told me it was because i was so used to doing it wrong. I now use this method while using the two levels from the wheeler kit. They all still look canted to me. I also mount an external level now.
This will be an ongoing battle, and I'm not sure I'm even winning it now.
FTFY
Directly over bore is overrated.
Maybe you should fix your jacked up horizontal stringing instead. LOL