Re: SEALs Scope... I know!!!
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: armednsafe</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You've had a bad experience with these scopes. Noted. Can you answer my question? How much error in the adjustments is acceptable for a scope of this price? </div></div>Asked and answered. You are assuming that a broken scope is worth a price, has utility and value. That's your assumption, it's based on a lack of knowledge, and it won't let you understand the answer.
Look up onto the Thread, from whence cometh your help:<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Graham</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If the scope doesn't track it's broken. Period. An adjustment range that makes the error bigger is then not a feature,</div></div><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Graham</div><div class="ubbcode-body">We don't 'walk' rounds to the target. One adjustment on the scope should equal one of those adjustments in the real world, throughout the adjustment range. </div></div>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: armednsafe</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I'm surprised that so few of you can actually bring a reasoned argument forward. </div></div>You wouldn't know a reasoned argument if it was etched on your reticle.