The only disappointing aspect of the tangent theta is the low down parallax.
Can you elaborate? I haven't ever heard or read anything concerning TT having parallax issues.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The only disappointing aspect of the tangent theta is the low down parallax.
i should have been more clear. low down focus. say 7m-10m. comparatively speaking of course.Can you elaborate? I haven't ever heard or read anything concerning TT having parallax issues.
The only disappointing aspect of the tangent theta is the low down parallax.
Hi mate, what kind of warranty that TT provides ? Cheers
pretty sure he means "short range focus", i.e. the ability to focus the scope at ranges really close (<50yds). S&B can focus on an object as close as 10m or something like that. TT lacks that capability.What do you mean by low down? The amount of adjusting required to remove parallax?
If im not mistaken, ATI is the US distributer, and they work with dealers.I made that decision in my mind a long time ago. I'd like to know if Armament Technology/TT are direct to dealer or if they have a US distributor; if they do have a distributor in the US, who is it?
Parallax doesn’t need to be touched after 400 (or so it seemed)
So to bump this thread and give an update, I ordered a TT 3-15x50 P model from CSTactical and received it yesterday. After mounting it on my Desert Tech and fingering it a while, I will say the turrets are absolutely the best "feeling" of any I've used. I've had Premier, NF Atacr & NXS, S&B PMII 5-25's, Kahles 624 Gen 3, Vortex Razor Gen 2, and probably others I've forgotten about. The turrets on the TT have the perfect crispness of clicks, the perfect amount of force required to turn, and the perfect spacing between clicks. The elevation and windage turrets feel exactly the same. Almost every other scope I've owned one turret feels different than the other. Everyone knows about the tool less rezero, and it's extremely easy to use and seems very robust. The glass is extremely clear, but I can't really say it's better than my S&B 5-25 yet. I just haven't had enough time with it to comment more than that on the glass. The magnification ring and parallax adjustment also have the perfect amount of tension to turn and are very smooth.
So far I'm very impressed with the scope. Is it worth the $? I really don't know. I've had lots of scopes that cost less, and when I received them I was a little underwhelmed. I'm not underwhelmed with the TT. I had a couple Premier 3-15's and the TT just feels more refined overall. Much more refined.
I sent TT an email asking about the Gen 2 XR reticle thickness. Their response was that the 3-15 has a line thickness of .040 mrad, and the 5-25 has a line thickness of .025 mrad. The thickness of the reticle seems about perfect at 15x, and gets thin below 10x.
Would also like to give a shout out to Richard at CSTactical. Excellent customer service! I'm one happy customer.
. The glass is extremely clear, but I can't really say it's better than my S&B 5-25 yet. I just haven't had enough time with it to comment more than that on the glass.
Impressive. Thanks.I have both and would say the 315 TT is the clearest scope I have looked through. I would put the 315 slightly ahead of both the 525P and the s&b 5-25. Now...I can see more with the 5-25’s cause they are bigger, but as far as clarity...the 315 has both others beat.
I have both and would say the 315 TT is the clearest scope I have looked through. I would put the 315 slightly ahead of both the 525P and the s&b 5-25. Now...I can see more with the 5-25’s cause they are bigger, but as far as clarity...the 315 has both others beat.
Been thinking about a TT for awhile. Any of you guys using the new Gen 3 XR?
Just a little update.....
I've had the chance to shoot several times now with my TT 3-15x50 P, and also compared to a PMII 5-25 and a recently acquired S&B 5-20x50 Ultra Short. To my eyes, the S&B's are the same. Both very clear and crisp image. The TT is noticeably better. It's hard to explain until you see it for yourself, but the image quality is just better with the TT. You can clearly see the tiniest details. The S&B's are really good, don't get me wrong. They are fantastic compared to most other scopes, but the TT is a little better. I have a hard time seeing CA and other color differences people talk about, so I'm only referring to image clarity and sharpness.
Agree 100% the S&B is top notch and she is king for my night time stuff. But during hours of day light TT Has the edge. So sharp and clear, running a close 2nd to Sarwo Z6 in light gathering. TT all the way.Unless he's got multiple, this TT315P is mine now. The day I got it mounted up, I spent a good deal of time bouncing back and forth between this and my 3-20x50 S&B US and my initial assessments were the same. Even with 5x less, details were sharper and clearer. And once on the range; the same held true at a half-mile and glassing objects at a mile.
I've adopted a pretty heavy filter that most opinions here now are heavily weighted through a lot of PRS and owner validation (fanboy) bias. Thus, I was skeptical that a TT could really be that good.
I'm starting to think it's not hype.
Yes sir. The price point keeps me having to log overtime.You know, if enough of you a$$holes would just boycott TT, I might be able to afford one..... Again.