I would be interested in hearing the reason most that said go 6.5 creedmore?
I am in this same dilemma, and seem to change my mind on a daily basis. At the heart of it my feeling TODAY is that if you want factory ammo, the 6.5 creedmore hands down. Also, some will quote that different case dimensions being better for heavier bullets since the case is a little shorter with little longer neck. How this really matters in the real world vs just seating the bullet a little deeper in the 260, I am not sure. This is obviously in terms of magazine capabilities, if you have the length the case capacity of the 260 could be beneficial, but seating them deeper will put it right on par with the 6.5 creedmore. I am looking to learn, so please don't nail me for this train of thought.
The main reason I am leaning 260 today is the brass. Not necessarily the lapua brass (because I think the Hornady brass is very very good from my understanding), but that I can neck up or neck down a variety of cases to form 260 much much easier than a person could form 6.5 creedmore. Given the current climate of reloading components, I think this may be beneficial at times. Further, the 6.5 brass is typically more expensive from what I have found as compared to most 308/243/7-08 cases (Lapua 260 is about the same as hornady 6.5 creedmore). Sure, brass can be re-used and all that but everyone will lose some if they shoot a lot or do matches with it, so having brass options seems like a good option. Unfortunately, the factory 260 match ammo options are few and expensive.
What am I missing?