I just purchased the Leica 2800.COM hoping it's what I've been looking for - an LRF that can give me drop and wind holds. I am also about to return a set of Zeiss Victory RF's. I did a review of the Nikon Laserforce, Vortex Fury HD (not the 5000 version) and Leica HD-B 2200's last year but was left wanting with the glass from the Nikon and Vortex. I also currently have the Sig Kilo 2000's which I'm wanting to replace (thought they are my reference because I know how to use them to get what I need). I think Diver's comments above are spot on, you need to know your equipment and understand how to use it, if you do this then almost any LRF should work for you - just know its limitations. Reading through this thread and some others has got me to realize I have a lot to learn still on how to effectively use my LRF so I appreciate all the effort at putting together tests and explaining results and experiences, this is time consuming but very helpful to the community.
I have not had a chance to look at the Sig 3000BDX but I have read enough reviews to know it is not the glass I am looking for. In fact, none of the Japanese or sometimes Chinese optics for binos and LRF's have really turned me on, they all tend to have a bluish color cast to them which really bugs me, especially in low light. The only Japanese glass I've seen that really impresses is Maven, but they don't make an LRF unit. This is what led me to pay the premium for the Zeiss Victory RF - which don't disappoint optically, but I was not as impressed with the LRF as I thought I'd be, especially in comparison to the Kilo 2000; however, reading through this thread and realizing that Sig may be setting their LRF's to provide better readings on a variety of things at the cost of, possibly, less precision makes me wonder if I was "fooled" into thinking the Kilo LRF has been doing "better" than it really is.
I think the real test is on animals and steel, which are the things I mostly shoot. I will still have the Victory RF's when the 2800.COM's come in so will try and get back out to the ranch to beam some antelope and cows at distance and do a comparison between Kilo 2000, Leica 2800.COM and Zeiss Victory RF....
I have not had a chance to look at the Sig 3000BDX but I have read enough reviews to know it is not the glass I am looking for. In fact, none of the Japanese or sometimes Chinese optics for binos and LRF's have really turned me on, they all tend to have a bluish color cast to them which really bugs me, especially in low light. The only Japanese glass I've seen that really impresses is Maven, but they don't make an LRF unit. This is what led me to pay the premium for the Zeiss Victory RF - which don't disappoint optically, but I was not as impressed with the LRF as I thought I'd be, especially in comparison to the Kilo 2000; however, reading through this thread and realizing that Sig may be setting their LRF's to provide better readings on a variety of things at the cost of, possibly, less precision makes me wonder if I was "fooled" into thinking the Kilo LRF has been doing "better" than it really is.
I think the real test is on animals and steel, which are the things I mostly shoot. I will still have the Victory RF's when the 2800.COM's come in so will try and get back out to the ranch to beam some antelope and cows at distance and do a comparison between Kilo 2000, Leica 2800.COM and Zeiss Victory RF....