"lack of quantifiable damages" defense of a defamation claim
This case doesn't fit the legal definition of Defamation in the first place.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"lack of quantifiable damages" defense of a defamation claim
Has there been a hearing date set? Is that even a relevant question? Maybe a link to the court records of this case when/if they become available?
Im watching this closely cause if sei wins i will sue every one of you fuckholes that have said i am awsome and know what i talk about, shit that is completely untrue.
You might want to read the very first post on this Thread.I haven't seen anything mentioning a court where the lawsuit was filed. If/when a lawsuit is filed rest assured you'll know about it.
You might want to read the very first post on this Thread.
I dont typically like boycotting companies, a lot of people work there and they will pay the price for having a douche bag owner, I own some SEI parts and have to say they are of high quality. I called them a few months ago about getting some work done to my rifle or even getting a new one, the guy on the phone was not too forthcoming, almost as if I was wasting his time with questions, I ended up sending my rifle to SAI to get a NM package done on it, only $458 for a new NM med barrel, NM sights, unitized gas system, and a stock bedding job, NM trigger job, plus it comes with a lifetime warranty. I am a happy SAI customer, as well as a LRB customer service, both those companies are pleasant to deal with, LRB is also a wealth of knowledge, they will not upsell you on anything, very straight forward and easy to talk to. There are a few otehr smiths on teh M14 forum who are also in teh same league as LRB and SAI, lots of options to deal with in the M14/M1a world.
OK, if you're still not willing to read the first post of this Thread, allow me to re-post an excerpt from the very first paragraph:Having been served with a lawsuit before it had the name of the judge, court, date it was filed and a big stamp on it. That looks like a civil complaint that has yet to be filed with a court.
Please think about what you posted, maybe for just a few seconds:You may be right regarding the boycott, who knows, however; it appears a very large number of "about to buy from SEI" types have already decided to boycott SEI. It may just be enough to put them out of business- I'd just be curious to know how their sales are for the next year-it may be they'll be hard pressed to sell a thing, I'll keep an ear open.
Those weren't instructions, that was a warning label.I once got sued by a company for claiming their erection creme didn't work. I lost. Badly. I didn't read the fine print: The instructions said it had to be applied by the hands of an 18 year old girl.
Please think about what you posted, maybe for just a few seconds:
Do you think all this would be happening if SEI could pay its bills and deliver on its promises?
Consider for a moment that the lawsuit could be an indication of SEI's existing business troubles rather than the cause of them.
Because it looks to me like the 'don't do business with SEI' horse has bolted from the barn, and there's no use in calling to people to shut the gate.
Track what? Why? It's a public forum.
I'm with Graham in that a company doing something like this is usually a sign of deeper troubles. Maybe not, it could be all ego but I'm betting something else is amiss. Time will tell.
L
That's still not correct. In fact, all of it is incorrect.
SEI have already made their claims in court. The complaint is evidence of that.
Hammond does not have to have legal representation, competent or otherwise, and he does not have to show up unless he wants to defend himself without a lawyer.
And, like I said before, the defendant does not have to disprove a plaintiff's claims. That's not how the system works.
Please, if you haven't a clue, kindly stop posting garbage.
By "business troubles" do you guys mean the law suit indicates they have business troubles, or the taking money in advance and making customers wait a very long time for product, then when hit with complaints-returning all the money 100% of it?
Thank you for telling everyone that I am correct but, respectfully, you wouldn't know.Graham is correct that the Defedant need not disprove the Plaintiff's allegations. However, the Defendant does need to Answer or otherwise appear within the prescribed period. Otherwise, a default judgment will be entered against him. If you don't show up, the Court will assume that the Plaintiff's allegations are true and correct. The Court would still hold a hearing to determine the amount of the Plaintiff's damages, as the Plaintiff does not have a claim for a sum certain.
The court doesn't assume anything.
LOL! That's because the lawyers make the rules.Sure they do, they assume the Lawyers know what the fuck they are talking about.
Thank you for telling everyone that I am correct but, respectfully, you wouldn't know.
And kindly stop cutting and pasting information from who-knows-where that you clearly don't understand.
The court doesn't assume anything.
Well please allow me to retort. First, isn’t the Internet great. On the Internet, someone like you can pretend to be whatever they want to be. In this case, an expert on Arizona law. I know absolutely nothing about your background, and you certainly know nothing of mine. I love to shoot. At the local matches the overwhelming majority of people I meet are great people. Good hard working people that enjoy shooting and like spending time with others that share their same passion for the sport. There are of course a few arrogant pricks there as well that work so very hard to convince everyone else of their superiority. Based upon your posts, you strike me as the latter. Perhaps you have the skillset and experience to backup your arrogance. Let’s find out shall we.
Please share with the good members of the hide your extensive experience practicing in Arizona Federal Court, or any court in Arizona. At the very least, please tell me your actually an attorney, and licensed to practice in some jurisdiction. I can tell you that, based upon your posts, it is clear that are not. Perhaps you are a transactional attorney, and not a litigator. I say that because you seem to have difficultly with matters that a litigator deals with on a daily basis. You didn’t understand the concept of personal jurisdiction until I explained it to you. Of course, your response was to inform me that I was completely wrong. Although curiously, you proceeded to regurgitate the information I posted in some of your subsequent posts.
Where do I get my information? From the Internet? From my personal experience and, in this case, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Before you start your Google search, let me narrow it down for you chief. It’s Rule 55. Have you ever obtained a default judgment against a defendant? If so, you would understand how it works. It’s a fairly straightforward procedure.
I’m sure you are knowledgeable about something, but this topic doesn’t appear to be in your wheelhouse my friend. You should stick to what you know. What’s the expression, “Jackoff of all trades, master of none.” No worries, if I got that wrong, I’m sure you will let me know.
So, in summation, unless you graduated law school with honors, are admitted to practice in three states by examination (this means you have sat for and passed the bar exam in three separate states, as opposed to being admitted by motion, which is far easier), and have practiced in Arizona District Court for more than a decade, I must kindly ask you to SHUT THE FUCK UP!
My apologies for derailing the thread, but in the words of my three year old “He started it.”
Well I'm counter-suing you because your praise for Fleshlights and Tenga Eggs has caused emotional strain on my marriage. Think twice before posting such things.....
Why don't you use Thread Tools -> Subscribe to this Thread option (found at the top of the thread header) and save yourself the inconvenience of having to post dummy messages to keep the thread "tagged"? This way the threads you care about will be in your Subscribed threads list, and you could go check them at your convenience any time.Tag to see where this one goes.
Sure they do, they assume the Lawyers know what the fuck they are talking about.
Try switching to decaffeinated beverages.
Except that your math doesn't add up.