Sadly this has become all too common on the forums these days, it's basically impossible to trust almost anything you read even here on optics and other new products etc. now, both good and bad. Tons of products get hyped or beat up on forums by sponsored shooters and social media employees as the latest and greatest. Then 2-3 years later you see the truth starts to seep in and the majority of reviews shift that they were never that good. The Strike Eagle was a great example of this, not that it's a bad $500 optic, but when it first came out it was another one that was ridiculously over hyped.
It used to be that we all knew magazine and paid sites or reviewers that got stuff for free were never going to say bad things about products, but the forums were a fairly good source of independent (not necessarily accurate) reviews. These days though, social media and forums have become such an income generator for companies that it's not surprising. Just look at customer service, if you call or email a company the last few years, often you get poor response. You put that same complaint on their facebook or twitter feed and you'll have people reaching backwards to get in touch with you and make it right.
Even here on the hide, we often see someone who contacted companies with problems, got the run around, but once they post here, and the company gets some wider bad press, magically they make everything right and the customer in question posts nice things about them and people seem happy about it. No one should be happy about that, it just means the company wasn't interested in customer service unless it hurt their wider public opinion. It's like the old saying about people being sorry about something once they are caught. Are they really sorry, or are they just sorry they got caught.
"Performs as good as optics costing 2x more" is becoming as undeservedly used here as "0.25 MOA rifle all day every day" used to be.