Re: Spindrift Calculation??
It is simple... most test as noted above are done in the field and everyone can agree field testing is not accurate... especially trying to determine true SD as opposed to other factors.
Now, people can run numbers using a computer model, to extrapolate what the actual drift would be if shot in a vacuum, however we don't shoot in a vacuum, nor does it take into account shooter errors.
Now, just off the cuff, if you look at things like this thread here as well as others like it, you might see the same thing I see at the range every time we have a class or competition.
3 Shot group thread
What I see is round after round of shooter error. To demonstrate this, and what potential it has at 1000 yards or more, we look no further than 100 yards.
Now, I don't want to single anyone out, so a blind test, to statistcally show that most people favor right, as much as a 1 MOA, but closer to .5 MOA, which at 1000 yards, compounded with 1 MOA of SD should be devastiting to a field shooter.
Look,
Note the number of shots right of the target...
again,
more, this time at 200 yards
here, and you get the picture
Just peruse through the threads of people who post images of their 100 yard, 200 yards, groups, etc. Count how many shots are taken and how many go right and how far. This information cannot be ignored and must be accounted for downrange...
So, we have wind, spindrift, and shooter error, where does this put the shot.
Its fine if you feel dialing 1 MOA is necessary, however it is an arbitrary number by everyone's admission. It has been rounded, adjusted for, and most important calculated in the field by HUMAN shooters... who have problems whether they want to admit it or not. Lucky for most proponents, people use right hand twist barrels that are on rifles owned by right handed shooters, so adding a correction for right handed drift is a pretty safe bet in anyone's book.