Rifle Scopes SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are up !

#52
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Manzgear</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Ok so these SS scopes- do a lot of people use them? and can anyone tell me about the quality of the glass? is it Japanese? just a quick summary would help if anyone knows about them. thanks </div></div>

There are currently 3 threads running right now about these scopes. You have the internet so, start reading.
 
#53
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Goin'Hot</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Manzgear</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Ok so these SS scopes- do a lot of people use them? and can anyone tell me about the quality of the glass? is it Japanese? just a quick summary would help if anyone knows about them. thanks </div></div>

There are currently 3 threads running right now about these scopes. You have the internet so, start reading. </div></div>

People never fail to amuse
 
#55
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jasonk</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jeo556</div><div class="ubbcode-body">To the gentlemen that have a production model in hand, I need a favor if you could please help me out. Is there any chance that I could get a accurate measurement of the O.D. of the objective end of the scope?

I have an XLR chassis and it's a little sensitive to ring height and I'd really like to know if my NF ultralights will work before my scope gets here.
.</div></div>

That's by far the biggest PITA with the XLR, I'm using AI mounts on mine for the Hensoldt, the 30mm one should work with the SS but it's an 18moa mount, so a 20moa base and 18moa mount "might" work out. I can test it for you in about a week, I've got a comp coming up and I'm not moving scopes around right now. </div></div>

Much agreed on the ring sensitivity of the XLR, but I still love it! Not to throw another wrench into the mix, but the OD of the objective is 60mm's, but what about with a Butler Creek cap on it? I hate to dig this horse up and pound on it, but I'd like to get the ring height right the first time...any info, as always, would be greatly appreciated.
 
#56
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

It was reported by Frank that a Nightforce 50mm shade tube fit the SS 5-10x50mm scopes. So if that's the case, my Nightforce 50mm tube is 59.1mm in width without the covers. With the cover on, the cover stretches out to 64.3mm (right at 2.5"). That doesn't include the hinge or the cover tabs. Just the basic diameter you would need to know for clearance.

The cover is a snug fit but with a little warm water they slide on with ease. So the SS objective cover will likely be the same or at most a size larger.

Mike
 
#59
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

ok Goin Hot, look I know how to read, but the purpose of my question was due to the fact that all who are talking about this scope seem to know a lot about it. I figured maybe someone could answer my few questions. apparently its just easier to say go find out for yourself.. I thought forums were for discussions and on occasions people helping others...
 
#60
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

Its been discussed annd discussed. Now you need to do some of your own WORK and find all the answers you so desire.

Put forth just a little effort before you ask us to hand it to you.
 
#61
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jasonk</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RTR Elmore</div><div class="ubbcode-body">This is my first post, so hello to all. I want to keep it simple, so my question for those who have recieved the production scope is: can I buy a better scope for 1k based on the glass? Thanks in advance. </div></div>

I will be better able to answer this tomorrow, but all indications are good for this scope being a great $1k value.</div></div>

Any update on this?
 
#62
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Goin'Hot</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Its been discussed annd discussed. Now you need to do some of your own WORK and find all the answers you so desire.

Put forth just a little effort before you ask us to hand it to you.</div></div>


Do I have to bring some of those hijacked tampons here ?
smile.gif




Aron-
 
#64
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Goin'Hot</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Its been discussed annd discussed. Now you need to do some of your own WORK and find all the answers you so desire.

Put forth just a little effort before you ask us to hand it to you. </div></div>

In other words, he doesn't know and he just likes to try and boss people around.
 
#65
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: valentin_84</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

Any update on this?</div></div>

I posted a picture and a short description on the facebook.com page. So far it appears to track very accurate and that the reticle is accurate as well.

As for the glass, it's very good, extremely good for the money imho. I will be testing more and more this week and will update as we go along. So far the SS HD 5-20 is meeting or beating all expectations.
 
#66
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jasonk</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: valentin_84</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

Any update on this?</div></div>

I posted a picture and a short description on the facebook.com page. So far it appears to track very accurate and that the reticle is accurate as well.

As for the glass, it's very good, extremely good for the money imho. I will be testing more and more this week and will update as we go along. So far the SS HD 5-20 is meeting or beating all expectations. </div></div>

I spent some time with the new Super Sniper at the range yesterday.

So far, I am impressed. Glass is very good for the price (better than I expected for anywhere near this amount of money). Knobs tracked perfectly.

For now, it was sitting on my 6.5 Grendel, but I will move onto the 338LM shortly.

ILya
 
#68
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jasonk</div><div class="ubbcode-body">ILya, what did you think of the eye box and eye relief? I was as impressed by it. </div></div>

It was very good.

I ran it side-by-side with the new Razor (redesigned eyepiece) and both had very forgiving in terms of eyerelief position.

ILya
 
#70
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

[/quote]Glass is very good for the price (better than I expected for anywhere near this amount of money).[/quote]

Do you consider the glass "better than expected" at the base price of $1500, or the GB price of $1000?
 
#71
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MDM</div><div class="ubbcode-body">[/quote]Glass is very good for the price (better than I expected for anywhere near this amount of money).</div></div>

Do you consider the glass "better than expected" at the base price of $1500, or the GB price of $1000? [/quote]

Both.
 
#73
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Felderthewelder</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Wish I could have made it to Angeles yesterday. </div></div>

I am probably going to come over on Wednesday night as well, although that is not as interesting since they only have illumination on 100 yard side of the range.

Still, that is enough to work the knobs.

ILya
 
#74
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cyrekzz</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Man i hope mine comes soon... i ordered mine 5/18/2011 3:44:47 PM. Can't wait to replace the glass on my 300 winmag!

</div></div>
Got you by 1 hr and 54 minutes.
smile.gif
Seriously though, all of these great reviews by those who are well respected and have had the opportunity to look through much better glass than I have...I can't help but be excited.
 
#75
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

The glass is very good at any price, and this focus on glass is sort of silly if you ask me. Sure there are low end scopes out that clearly have poor glass, and even a few "better" scopes that have some cloudy, murky glass, especially after use. The coatings are subject to environmental effects and break down quicker than others... however this is not one of them. Having consistently used the SS-HD over time under harsher than normal conditions, they still hold up well in the glass department. The 3-9X and 10XHD both still hold up well after these years of being on the range with them. The glass mantra is old and tired.

The real meat and potatoes is, and will always be the internals. However accurate they are, and how well they hold up to repeated use. The SS-HD has shown SWFA did it right, they considered this, along with making sure the eye relief and eye box was worthy of a tactical scope and not nearly as critical as a lot of scopes out there. (the new March I have comes to mind) To me, this leads to the mechanics and the design of the scope. Whether it was done right or not.. the very best scopes, track accurate, as well have accurate clicks further out in the adjustment range, they are not subject to losing trends as the adjustments are dialed in. This is why IOR has the bad reputation here they do, great glass, terrible internals over the years that lead to multiple generations of the same scope to fix problems.

Anyone can look at a scope and give an opinion, and out of the box most look great, but how do they look 1 year from now after being used, wiped on, subject to rain, sun, wind and sand... do they maintain their quality, are the coatings holding up to use. Sure there are a few things that can be considered negative and it takes a mildly educated eye to note whether the edges suffer from distortion, or color aberrations, this can be considered important to a shooter, but really if the eye box is unforgiving the scope is but little use to a shooter who shoots in any other position by prone, or from a bench. If you only shoot in one of two ways, few notice the problem, but if you go from prone to kneeling, to sitting, back and forth, the critical nature of a poor design becomes clear. The SS-HD doesn't suffer from this...

The adjustments are solid, the glass is excellent, the design is well made and well thought out, and it's size and overall design are very traditional, not overly heavy or long like others trying to create a design that works.
 
#76
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The SS-HD has shown SWFA did it right, they considered this, along with making sure the eye relief and eye box was worthy of a tactical scope and not nearly as critical as a lot of scopes out there. (the new March I have comes to mind) </div></div>
Yeah, I spent much of yesterday shooting the SS (new production model) next to the 3-24 March. Yes, the March can win a pure resolution contest but the SS was much more "friendly" to use. I think the March would benefit from a 50mm objective.

The range I was at has odd lighting issues with my eyes though, I'll have to spend some time with the March in the wide open spaces before speaking too harshly of it. The point remains though that I, and I think most shooters, would have picked the SS to continue using after some time with each. They really did a heck of a job.
 
#77
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jon A</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The SS-HD has shown SWFA did it right, they considered this, along with making sure the eye relief and eye box was worthy of a tactical scope and not nearly as critical as a lot of scopes out there. (the new March I have comes to mind) </div></div>
Yeah, I spent much of yesterday shooting the SS (new production model) next to the 3-24 March. Yes, the March can win a pure resolution contest but the SS was much more "friendly" to use. I think the March would benefit from a 50mm objective.

The range I was at has odd lighting issues with my eyes though, I'll have to spend some time with the March in the wide open spaces before speaking too harshly of it. The point remains though that I, and I think most shooters, would have picked the SS to continue using after some time with each. They really did a heck of a job. </div></div>

Encouraging...
 
#78
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ILya</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Felderthewelder</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Wish I could have made it to Angeles yesterday. </div></div>

I am probably going to come over on Wednesday night as well, although that is not as interesting since they only have illumination on 100 yard side of the range.

Still, that is enough to work the knobs.

ILya </div></div>

Ehh, can't make it then either. Oh well.
 
#79
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Felderthewelder</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ILya</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Felderthewelder</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Wish I could have made it to Angeles yesterday. </div></div>

I am probably going to come over on Wednesday night as well, although that is not as interesting since they only have illumination on 100 yard side of the range.

Still, that is enough to work the knobs.

ILya </div></div>

Ehh, can't make it then either. Oh well. </div></div>

Next time I'll be at Angeles after that is Friday morning.

ILya
 
#80
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jon A</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The SS-HD has shown SWFA did it right, they considered this, along with making sure the eye relief and eye box was worthy of a tactical scope and not nearly as critical as a lot of scopes out there. (the new March I have comes to mind) </div></div>
Yeah, I spent much of yesterday shooting the SS (new production model) next to the 3-24 March. Yes, the March can win a pure resolution contest but the SS was much more "friendly" to use. I think the March would benefit from a 50mm objective.

The range I was at has odd lighting issues with my eyes though, I'll have to spend some time with the March in the wide open spaces before speaking too harshly of it. The point remains though that I, and I think most shooters, would have picked the SS to continue using after some time with each. They really did a heck of a job. </div></div>

I don't find the March any more "unfriendly" then my F1, or the SWFA 10HD. That's not saying that the SWFA 5-20 is not better.
 
#81
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cjgemm</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I don't find the March any more "unfriendly" then my F1, or the SWFA 10HD. That's not saying that the SWFA 5-20 is not better. </div></div>
I should be more specific. There's nothing wrong with the March, it's just that the SS is really, really, friendly eye relief-wise. And on a gloomy day from a covered range, 20X with a 50mm objective has a leg up on 24X with a 42mm objective as far as image brightness and eye strain go, which shouldn't be a surprise. As I said, I need to get the March outside into the daylight to more fairly see what it can do.
 
#83
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: problemchild</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Its a minor glitch but I would prefer a cap without the giant super-chicken logo. </div></div>

Sharpie.
 
#84
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

The March I have here, same model as Jon, has a very critical eye box. The eye relief is much shorter, and you can really only be in one position in order to get edge to edge clarity.

If you shoot prone all the time that might be fine, but i don't consider a tactical scope one that is so sensitive. Eye box is important, the March is designed for one thing, its relief and eye box limits it.
 
#85
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

Actually I found the March a little more finicky to shoot prone then my Nightforce, but thought it had more to do with the rifle config than the optic (A1-3 vs A5). My March is also non-illuminated, but that should not make a difference. Not trying to take away from the new SS at all, but using the March didn't require any more effort than my F1.
 
#86
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cjgemm</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Actually I found the March a little more finicky to shoot prone then my Nightforce, but thought it had more to do with the rifle config than the optic (A1-3 vs A5). My March is also non-illuminated, but that should not make a difference. Not trying to take away from the new SS at all, but using the March didn't require any more effort than my F1.</div></div>

Didn't you just contradict yourself... you just said it was more finicky.
 
#87
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

I'll have a better (more detailed) write up tonight or tomorrow, I have a 5-22 NXS on the way to me. I was able to look through a 3-15x50 and the SS 5-20x50 HD last night around dusk at the range. The 5-20 SS was noticeably brighter than the NXS at all powers.
 
#88
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

Jason I look forward to checking it out at Oregon. I have to live up to my scope whore name Tony gave me. LOL So I have owned and used alot of scopes. So what right?
 
#89
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Rob01</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Jason I look forward to checking it out at Oregon. I have to live up to my scope whore name Tony gave me. LOL So I have owned and used alot of scopes. So what right?</div></div>

I'll be there Friday for a little while giving Tony his rifle back, you can check it out then or during sight in on Saturday for sure. I think you'll be impressed.

Frank called me a gear whore too, I prefer to think of us as experienced users.
smile.gif
 
#90
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cjgemm</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Actually I found the March a little more finicky to shoot prone then my Nightforce, but thought it had more to do with the rifle config than the optic (A1-3 vs A5). My March is also non-illuminated, but that should not make a difference. Not trying to take away from the new SS at all, but using the March didn't require any more effort than my F1.</div></div>

Didn't you just contradict yourself... you just said it was more finicky. </div></div>

Your right I did, I looked at both set up's tonight and found I had the March mounted to far back. Moved it forward and now (at least in my opinion) it's on par with my F1 when getting behind the rifle prone, kneeling, sitting etc. The new SS sounds like a great scope, If I wouldn't have replaced my Premier and my USO with 2 identical F1's I would have bought one of these instead.
 
#91
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

Well jasonk...How did the SS do for you at your match this past weekend? Did you ever get that NF for a side by side?
 
#92
Re: SS 5-20x50 HD is in hand ... New Pictures are

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MDM</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Well jasonk...How did the SS do for you at your match this past weekend? Did you ever get that NF for a side by side?</div></div>

It worked fine, all the misses were sadly all my fault!!
smile.gif


I put it next to the NXS 3-15 and the 5-22. Good news for everyone that ordered the SS
smile.gif


I'm working on a writeup, you may see it here by morning.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Rifle Scopes New hunting scope
Replies
23
Views
830
secondofangle2
secondofangle2
jbell
Rifle Scopes Bushnell Match Pro ED 3-18 & other budget scopes
Replies
16
Views
569
Rob01
Rob01
B
SOLD Athlon Midas Tac HD -- 4-16x44 -- Mil -- Like New in Box -- SOLD
Replies
6
Views
549
trailrider121
trailrider121
rdramsey8
New Scope Dilemma
Replies
36
Views
1K
rdramsey8
rdramsey8
Hussell
SOLD Leupold Mark5 HD 5-25 PR2
Replies
2
Views
439
cpolson.cp
cpolson.cp
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts