Re: Super Sniper vs Falcon Menace
I currently own 3 falcons and one ss 5-20. I've still got the 16 and 20 fixed ss as well. I bought them all from SWFA in Red Oak face to face. David Hallenbeck and the crew are a standup outfit that will bend over backwards to make you happy. I've never seen a company that will give you more trade value for what you got than they do. I've also had a scope that was out of warranty traded no questions asked. I don't see where anyone should have a complaint bout SWFA.
The SS series of scopes are tougher than shit. You can literally throw them at the ground and I bet you have a better than 80% chance that you didn't lose zero. The drawback to the fixed power scopes is that they are fixed. That only suits certain shooting styles. If you want the best they got, (in my opinion, the 5-20 is a heavy hitter) you can buy it for less than a mark4. The difference in those two is you ain't gotta worry bout fuckin up the ss. They're not on par with a razor, but shit, they're $800 less.
Falcon Menace single tubes have been good to me. I like the new reticles and they track well. Clicks are mushy as fuck, but if I was worried bout that, I'd have spent more than $500. They're heavy as shit, but I believe they and millett lrs-1 are the best value for the money. With any newer company there's gonna be faulty products. Hell, I don't know any company that doesn't have a few complaints. I don't have a single one about falcon except that they're lunky as hell. I've never had a problem with ss and won't cause they know my name when I walk in the door, plus the damn scopes never knock off zero.
It's up to you which you choose. Basically, if you got $500, buy the falcon in some form. If you have a grand, buy the ss 5-20. If you got $2k quitcherbitchin and buy a razor or nightforce. I still think that mrad 20x ss is the shit for a dedicated long range rig. can't beat it with a stick for $300.