Re: SWFA-SS Tax Day Group Buy: 1-6, 5-20, and more!
You are correct in that we'll have to agree to disagree (and I <span style="font-style: italic">do</span> respect your rights in that regard.) Quite frankly pretty much every group buy seems to go this way: a ‘Hide vendor offers a great deal only to have one, or a few, forum member(s) complain publicly in the forums that it doesn’t quite meet their wants and needs. The exact same thing happened with the original SS 5-20 group buy. More than once we’ve witnessed a vendor express second thoughts and even regrets for having made the group-buy offer in the first place. I, for one, think getting 20% off the price of a product that would no-doubt sell quickly even without the discount is a really great deal, no matter the wait. For the record we don’t even know what the actual wait will be as all we have is second-hand info and speculation to this point.
As a small business owner myself I guess you struck a nerve. I also occasionally have a customer agree to make a purchase under mutually agreed terms only to later decide he wants to change the agreement to better suit his wants. I’m working with one right now. We agreed, by written contract that my company would have a certain scope of work completed by June 30, 2012. Here is a portion or his correspondence with me today: <span style="font-style: italic">“I understand the contract does indicate completion by the end of June. Unfortunately at the time we did not understand the impact this would have on our living conditions ...</span>” in other words ‘I don’t care what we agreed, I want it now…' As it stands we're on track to have the work completed by the middle of next week, a month-and-a-half earlier than the commitment under which the sale was made! Had he conditioned his purchase upon completion of that work earlier than the contracted date, quite frankly, I would have politely declined to make that sale. It just isn't right, IMHO, to buy under mutually agreed terms and then complain about it when the other party does exactly what you both agreed to. While I certainly don’t speak for them, I’m guessing SWFA would feel the same way.
Respectfully;
PLong