Haven't even finished it, but I gotta post this up NOW. Why hasn't this been posted yet. I dunno.
Love it !!
Love it !!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
snip . . .
Imagine if every election half the people on the ballot were unknown with no voting record. The only way to assess them is what they said campaigning (usually lies) and what is said about them in the media (usually lies). Instead of corporate interests and lobbyists paying them off once in office- they will pay to put them in office through media hype, campaign contributions, etc.. Term limits are just changing how the corruption operates and you cant reelect the few good ones.
I don't disagree per se.While Im for term limits, I'll play devils advocate here. Since we had them under the Articles of Confederation they were openly debated before our founders intentionally dropped them in the Constitution. The winning case for dropping them is in Federalist Paper 53. Madison argued that waves of inexperienced legislators would be more easily manipulated and fall into traps. There would also be less information on them- voters would more often be voting on an unknown entity. Basically someones time in office can be used to vet them for future elections and eventually have a more credible body than a bunch of wolfs in sheeps clothing (or a dodo bird in sheeps clothing) every time.
There is some level of truth to this. Imagine if every election half the people on the ballot were unknown with no voting record. The only way to assess them is what they said campaigning (usually lies) and what is said about them in the media (usually lies). Instead of corporate interests and lobbyists paying them off once in office- they will pay to put them in office through media hype, campaign contributions, etc.. Term limits are just changing how the corruption operates and you cant reelect the few good ones.
While Im for term limits, I'll play devils advocate here. Since we had them under the Articles of Confederation they were openly debated before our founders intentionally dropped them in the Constitution. The winning case for dropping them is in Federalist Paper 53. Madison argued that waves of inexperienced legislators would be more easily manipulated and fall into traps. There would also be less information on them- voters would more often be voting on an unknown entity. Basically someones time in office can be used to vet them for future elections and eventually have a more credible body than a bunch of wolfs in sheeps clothing (or a dodo bird in sheeps clothing) every time.
There is some level of truth to this. Imagine if every election half the people on the ballot were unknown with no voting record. The only way to assess them is what they said campaigning (usually lies) and what is said about them in the media (usually lies). Instead of corporate interests and lobbyists paying them off once in office- they will pay to put them in office through media hype, campaign contributions, etc.. Term limits are just changing how the corruption operates and you cant reelect the few good ones.
I don’t think he would say anything about term limits. That’s not the big issue. The big issue is money in politics.What do you think Madison would say now?
I’m game for that.You won't get term limits without a constitutional amendment so pretty much it's a dead end idea until some major upheaval.
I don’t think he would say anything about term limits. That’s not the big issue. The big issue is money in politics.
I'm for Term Limits but I think we'd be better off with holding our Representatives to their oaths of office under the threat of criminal prosecution. They take an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign or domestic, and then repeatedly either draft or support/vote for unconstitutional legislation with impunity.
If I go into a court of law and swear to tell the truth, the whole, truth and nothing but the truth SO Help ME God, and I'm caught at perjury I go to jail.
If a Representative or Senator drafts legislation that is determined to be unlawful/unconstitutional, that person should be tried for breach of oath and jailed. Not elected again - ever. criminal offense to draft or support unlawful/unconstitutional legislation.
VooDoo
Do "We"?Then why do we keep voting for the same people in every election ? Most can agree it does not matter what party's sticker is on their forehead, they are all the same.
When I go to the booth, I never reelect anyone. Only on election day do you matter to a politician, the rest of the time we are irrelevant.