Here's the "spy pics" from a few days ago. Now displayed at Shot Show. Booth 20,459
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And the integrated Arca rail. I really love the aesthetics and functionality of this chassis more every time I see it. I just wish I could see mine in person.I like that Ted decided to incorporate a bag rider into his chassis design
I hope the Xylo ships first to the preorders.
I go back and forth on this chassis. Functionally it seems pretty well thought out, and I would love to get behind one to see how it feels.
Where I get hung up is the aesthetics. It has an industrial, almost "steam punk" look to it, that I'm just not sure if it agrees with my sensibilities or not.
I also still think there should be micarta grip panels available in different sizes and colors, to accommodate different hand sizes. A micarta cheek pad would be cool as well - having some wild micarta colors (like a vibrant red or green) on matching grips and cheek pad would look badass, and help pull it away from the industrial steam punk look, IMO.
I go back and forth on this chassis. Functionally it seems pretty well thought out, and I would love to get behind one to see how it feels.
Where I get hung up is the aesthetics. It has an industrial, almost "steam punk" look to it, that I'm just not sure if it agrees with my sensibilities or not.
I also still think there should be micarta grip panels available in different sizes and colors, to accommodate different hand sizes. A micarta cheek pad would be cool as well - having some wild micarta colors (like a vibrant red or green) on matching grips and cheek pad would look badass, and help pull it away from the industrial steam punk look, IMO.
Ok I’ll say it. That thing is hideous.
not to mention you will probably have to have a PHD to adjust anything in it. Yuk.
So, getting back on track from the preorder bitching, what is the ARC rifle? Looks like a Xylo with an Archimedes...what barrel, trigger, price?
Ok I’ll say it. That thing is hideous.
not to mention you will probably have to have a PHD to adjust anything in it. Yuk.
I’m curious who did the barrels.I got so caught up on the chassis I forgot this was a whole rifle!
Curious to see specs and price. I wonder if Ted is going to try and compete in the PRS production market?
My experience with my nucleus with barloc and M10 rings has been nothing but positive.After the Barloc and Nucleus debacle, it's tough to get behind ARC products. Hopefully, he can produce some winners but I'll wait until beta testers iron out the issues. The Archimedes action had issues in the beginning too, lol. Maybe this stock won't have any issues.
My experience with my nucleus with barloc and M10 rings has been nothing but positive.
I’d 100% buy more ARC products
I’ve even had great results with ARC mags.I also love my ARC products. My M5 Mausingfield is damn near perfection, and I absolutely love the ARC M10 rings.
I had big hopes for the ARC mags, but those were a swing and a miss. I can see why some would feel burned by ARC, and have moved on to other companies. It's a shame, because Ted comes up with some really clever products. He does jump around a lot with developing new products, and at the rate he moves there's bound to be some quirks.
I’ve seen the shop.In his most recent posts, he's mentioned that he's making his current focus on streamlining production, and in turn, the product line, hence the Nucleus 2.0 sharing many components with the Archimedes, Rather than trying to push to invent the next latest and greatest thing all the time. He realizes that ARC was overwhelmed, and it sounds as though he's learned from it.
The Barloc issues were caused by improper installation and ignoring the instructions.After the Barloc and Nucleus debacle, it's tough to get behind ARC products. Hopefully, he can produce some winners but I'll wait until beta testers iron out the issues. The Archimedes action had issues in the beginning too, lol. Maybe this stock won't have any issues.
After the Barloc and Nucleus debacle, it's tough to get behind ARC products. Hopefully, he can produce some winners but I'll wait until beta testers iron out the issues. The Archimedes action had issues in the beginning too, lol. Maybe this stock won't have any issues.
Ted has been open with his personal skepticism with the Barloc since it's inception, and it was created to provide a method that doesn't drill the receiver face for those who feel the need to have a switch-barrel device between the barrel and receiver. It was never offered as a "good idea". That said, it does do what Ted/ARC claims it does.
I've also done extensive testing with shouldered, jam-nut style, and Barloc barrels and my testing is in line with Ted's.
- Shouldered barrels can also be bumped around, especially dependent on torque applied to the barrel and how obscene of an impact you give it.
- Barloc barrels only show significant impact shift from regular bumps if the device isn't working properly (i.e. when you tighten the barloc there is no gap in the top of the "clamp"). If the device is installed and torqued properly and still has a gap up top, it takes a pretty hard smack to move POI.
I disagree.The more components and retention systems you add to the barrel/receiver interface, the more problems and reliability issues you potentially induce in the system.
Switch barrel systems are a gimmick IMO, and every rifle is in some ways a "switch barrel rifle".
If you buy a switch barrel rifle and then complain because the barrel that is retained by a set screw moves around more with bumps then a shouldered barrel that's torqued up to 100 ft-lbs - WTF did you expect? Doesn't take a PhD in physics to figure out that was going to happen.
His customers begged for it and he hesitantly made it for them would be more accurate.So Ted sells a gimmick and everyone is ok with that? I had no idea and it sucks to learn that now.
So Ted sells a gimmick and everyone is ok with that? I had no idea and it sucks to learn that now.
So Ted sells a gimmick and everyone is ok with that? I had no idea and it sucks to learn that now.
Hahahaha!!!I don't whack my barrel but I've noticed when I transport my rifle to ranges, my first shot would be off at 100 while the rest of the groups would be touching. I always attested it to me being the cold shooter. I actually bought the nucleus because of the Barloc but I wasn't informed that poi shifts were ok by Ted. I feel cheated, lesson learned.
Hahahaha!!!
So you are experiencing cold bore/cold shooter syndrome and calling it impact shifts due to the barloc? Lmao!! You should feel cheated. That you were raised without a lick of understanding and appreciation of your own shortcomings.
So Ted sells a gimmick and everyone is ok with that? I had no idea and it sucks to learn that now.
I don’t have to pull the action from my chassis to swap barrels.What is wrong with just a Savage style barrel nut and torque. Doesn't take long and is snug as a rug.
XLR may not have the prettiest, but it's a damn sight better than this.I wouldn’t say my XLR elements are super models but they’re comfortable, consistent and the company has treated extremely well.
the adjustments on the ARC chassis are stupid simple.
I think the Xylo will grow on people because everything is very purposeful.XLR may not have the prettiest, but it's a damn sight better than this.
This is th ugliest thing since the McRees chassis.
I like it better than the Xylo lolI think the Xylo will grow on people because everything is very purposeful.
For a real ugly one I give you the Woox Furiosa:
WOOX Furiosa Chassis - Walnut
WOOX Furiosa Chassis - Walnut ***This product ships from another warehouse location and not available at our retail store. Orders will take an additional 3-5 business days for processing, please be aware when choosing your shipping method*** WOOX Furiowww.rainierarms.com
It seems like a Xylo copy except it's missing a lot of features.