Wiki describes “grassroots” in the following way: Grassroots movements and organizations utilize collective action from the local level to effect change at the local, regional, national, or international level. Grassroots movements are associated with bottom-up, rather than top-down decision-making, and are sometimes considered more natural or spontaneous than more traditional power structures
The precision rifle competition has two futures, the 3Gun Nation Precision Rifle Series, and the grassroots, club series. While the PRS has positioned itself as an adjective used to describe these competitions, they, in fact, demonstrate, “how not to do something”.
Understand this, the PRS started on Sniper’s Hide. I saw it from the first day. I watched the discussions grow into an actual series. Despite every misstep, every warning, they continue to make mistakes. It’s a clique even more so than a club. It takes two steps forward and one step back at each milestone. Rumor control has it, the series is once again changing hands. The funny part is, the new buyer is someone who was pissed about the finale and actually stormed off the range. His revenge, buy it.
I am not even gonna list the pros and cons, and just say, they helped bring attention to a lot of matches. All that is highly positive. The fact that people use the term “PRS” to describe precision rifle competition outside of the known distance stuff shows the hunger out there for organization around these events. The key is at the grassroots levels. Local events that develop the new shooters. Without the travel, the expense, the drama it’s at the local level where things will continue to grow.
There are a bunch of highly successful local events happening every month out there. The egos are missing, the big names, the jerseys (LOL) all absent from theses grassroots competitions. It’s working too. Ask the Missouri MoST guys how well their stuff is happening.
What we are missing is a playoff series vs a series trying to insist every match is of national importance. We just can’t have 40 national level events, at least not right now. We are bleeding the system dry. Today you have the Series competing with itself. Several PRS events scheduled on the same weekend, and no I am not talking club series events vs the larger events. More than one larger event not regionally separated by enough air between them.
The PRS Club Series is good to go in this respect. Line up the clubs, figure out the regions and then work towards a playoff series. Make qualification easier for the playoffs.
Score high enough at a club level, compete in a regional event, come in the top 10 and you have a seat at the finale. Your regional level commitment is finished. You can continue to shoot at the club level to practice, heck you can even do another regional event but your score is not used. Then have a finale that can handle a large enough group of shooters to actually matter.
Precision rifle is still growing, but we are fooling ourselves into thinking these Series are making the real difference. It’s fractured, we have 3 competing series who want to be the one known to have “The Best Shooters” …
Today the one with the best model to follow appears to be the 3Gun Nation Entry. The other two are making the same mistakes over and over. The difference is the spokesman for those series. Who has a better message? Still, the attitudes show this is far from working out as planned by either of them. If you shoot one you cannot play with the other. If you’re a match director you have to pick your poison because we don’t want you playing with the other guy. Why can’t I submit my scores to both? Does it really matter? A match director should not be forced to pick sides.
Go Nomad, Go Local, Heck be the grassroots start up in your area and do it your own way. Make an interesting course of fire, with a solid set of rules that apply to everyone, and don’t forget to include the little guys. You know the Juniors, the new shooter, the Ladies, all that matters. Competitions used to be a destination. You’d go to see old friends, challenge yourself individually and most of all to get away and have fun. It needs to be about having fun.
I enjoy the local events much more now than ever before. I get to sleep in my own bed. I get to help new shooters navigate the course of fire, I can flush out a new set of equipment without the added expense of traveling across the country. It doesn't matter, I am out shooting, having fun, not taking myself too seriously. When it's over I go home, I don't care if they have a prizer, heck I don't care where I place. I get to do my thing at their event.
Grassroots Series are the future, make no mistake.
For the companies reading this, consider the prize donation to a series with 100 sponsored shooters. That is an isolated pond. Do you really think a Shooter sponsored by Vortex wants to win or keep your Bushnell Scope? Of course not that get sold on Monday morning. Sooner if they can manage it. You can not cultivate new customers when the majority of the eyes on your contribution are sponsored by your competitor. You may get one or two them to jump ship if you are offering them products. But really you are preaching to the choir and unfortunately they probably already have a name on their jersey. This eliminates the need to "Pay For your Hobby". That is the problem, guys traveling across the country forced to use their placing as a way to pay for the trip.
The big success in all this is the GAP GRIND Pro-Am event. That is a great example of how to do to an event right. It’s a destination event, it's a learning opportunity, it’s a way to open the door to a host of new shooters. An equal number of new shooters in fact. Not something so skewed where the bottom 10% are routinely overlooked and dismissed. The Pro-AM opens the doors wide.
My solution, the series need to cultivate the smaller venues and worry about the National level stuff later. Help these guys grow in a way that can be sustained. Yes, it costs money to operate, but that is where the power of the series should come into play. The local events feed the regions, which then work towards a playoff ending in a finale.
This is even spreading overseas, which is a great thing.
As down as I appear on these series, I am more so disappointed. I see them as ruining a good thing by creating a group of cliques which completely miss the point. Sure the early matches we put on did not host nearly as many shooters as they do now. What we did to fix this was to add other events. We had the Sniper’s Hide Cup, when that got too big we added the Shooter’s, Bash. That was more of a launch pad towards the Cup. The disgruntled shooters trying to compete against their former series should step back and create a local series. Franchise that model to other local venues, and create these smaller events which can then build to a playoff, culminating in a finale. In my opinion, I would let people who participated try their luck at a playoff event. Hold 4 playoffs, you can then manage the top 25 of each to enter the finale.
I am not looking to piss in anyone's cornflakes, but honestly, if you cannot see the problems, you might be part of them. This stuff is pretty straight forward and easy to read.
The precision rifle competition has two futures, the 3Gun Nation Precision Rifle Series, and the grassroots, club series. While the PRS has positioned itself as an adjective used to describe these competitions, they, in fact, demonstrate, “how not to do something”.
Understand this, the PRS started on Sniper’s Hide. I saw it from the first day. I watched the discussions grow into an actual series. Despite every misstep, every warning, they continue to make mistakes. It’s a clique even more so than a club. It takes two steps forward and one step back at each milestone. Rumor control has it, the series is once again changing hands. The funny part is, the new buyer is someone who was pissed about the finale and actually stormed off the range. His revenge, buy it.
I am not even gonna list the pros and cons, and just say, they helped bring attention to a lot of matches. All that is highly positive. The fact that people use the term “PRS” to describe precision rifle competition outside of the known distance stuff shows the hunger out there for organization around these events. The key is at the grassroots levels. Local events that develop the new shooters. Without the travel, the expense, the drama it’s at the local level where things will continue to grow.
There are a bunch of highly successful local events happening every month out there. The egos are missing, the big names, the jerseys (LOL) all absent from theses grassroots competitions. It’s working too. Ask the Missouri MoST guys how well their stuff is happening.
What we are missing is a playoff series vs a series trying to insist every match is of national importance. We just can’t have 40 national level events, at least not right now. We are bleeding the system dry. Today you have the Series competing with itself. Several PRS events scheduled on the same weekend, and no I am not talking club series events vs the larger events. More than one larger event not regionally separated by enough air between them.
The PRS Club Series is good to go in this respect. Line up the clubs, figure out the regions and then work towards a playoff series. Make qualification easier for the playoffs.
Score high enough at a club level, compete in a regional event, come in the top 10 and you have a seat at the finale. Your regional level commitment is finished. You can continue to shoot at the club level to practice, heck you can even do another regional event but your score is not used. Then have a finale that can handle a large enough group of shooters to actually matter.
Precision rifle is still growing, but we are fooling ourselves into thinking these Series are making the real difference. It’s fractured, we have 3 competing series who want to be the one known to have “The Best Shooters” …
Today the one with the best model to follow appears to be the 3Gun Nation Entry. The other two are making the same mistakes over and over. The difference is the spokesman for those series. Who has a better message? Still, the attitudes show this is far from working out as planned by either of them. If you shoot one you cannot play with the other. If you’re a match director you have to pick your poison because we don’t want you playing with the other guy. Why can’t I submit my scores to both? Does it really matter? A match director should not be forced to pick sides.
Go Nomad, Go Local, Heck be the grassroots start up in your area and do it your own way. Make an interesting course of fire, with a solid set of rules that apply to everyone, and don’t forget to include the little guys. You know the Juniors, the new shooter, the Ladies, all that matters. Competitions used to be a destination. You’d go to see old friends, challenge yourself individually and most of all to get away and have fun. It needs to be about having fun.
I enjoy the local events much more now than ever before. I get to sleep in my own bed. I get to help new shooters navigate the course of fire, I can flush out a new set of equipment without the added expense of traveling across the country. It doesn't matter, I am out shooting, having fun, not taking myself too seriously. When it's over I go home, I don't care if they have a prizer, heck I don't care where I place. I get to do my thing at their event.
Grassroots Series are the future, make no mistake.
For the companies reading this, consider the prize donation to a series with 100 sponsored shooters. That is an isolated pond. Do you really think a Shooter sponsored by Vortex wants to win or keep your Bushnell Scope? Of course not that get sold on Monday morning. Sooner if they can manage it. You can not cultivate new customers when the majority of the eyes on your contribution are sponsored by your competitor. You may get one or two them to jump ship if you are offering them products. But really you are preaching to the choir and unfortunately they probably already have a name on their jersey. This eliminates the need to "Pay For your Hobby". That is the problem, guys traveling across the country forced to use their placing as a way to pay for the trip.
The big success in all this is the GAP GRIND Pro-Am event. That is a great example of how to do to an event right. It’s a destination event, it's a learning opportunity, it’s a way to open the door to a host of new shooters. An equal number of new shooters in fact. Not something so skewed where the bottom 10% are routinely overlooked and dismissed. The Pro-AM opens the doors wide.
My solution, the series need to cultivate the smaller venues and worry about the National level stuff later. Help these guys grow in a way that can be sustained. Yes, it costs money to operate, but that is where the power of the series should come into play. The local events feed the regions, which then work towards a playoff ending in a finale.
This is even spreading overseas, which is a great thing.
As down as I appear on these series, I am more so disappointed. I see them as ruining a good thing by creating a group of cliques which completely miss the point. Sure the early matches we put on did not host nearly as many shooters as they do now. What we did to fix this was to add other events. We had the Sniper’s Hide Cup, when that got too big we added the Shooter’s, Bash. That was more of a launch pad towards the Cup. The disgruntled shooters trying to compete against their former series should step back and create a local series. Franchise that model to other local venues, and create these smaller events which can then build to a playoff, culminating in a finale. In my opinion, I would let people who participated try their luck at a playoff event. Hold 4 playoffs, you can then manage the top 25 of each to enter the finale.
I am not looking to piss in anyone's cornflakes, but honestly, if you cannot see the problems, you might be part of them. This stuff is pretty straight forward and easy to read.