Right, because if he was caught and spooked he would have kept hold of his “swag bag” or stolen goods... yeah that makes a lot of sense.
The fact of the matter is there’s a video showing these guys aren’t 100% in the wrong. There’s nothing wrong with asking someone to stop and talk to them, there’s nothing illegal about doing it while armed. The dude never point the gun at him and it’s quite clear in the video. HE ATTACKED THEM. Fucking period. You can not argue with that, it’s literally on fucking video.
Now whether they should have really been there in the first place seems very debatable, but regardless of how stupid it was, I fail to see how it was illegal and I don’t think anyone on a jury would see it any differently.
When he decided to attack them and fight over the gun, the game changed. He decided to do that instead of going the other way. Why the fuck would he continue running towards them and attack them when he was clearly outmatched? I don’t believe this guy was innocent, regardless he should have gone the other way, that’s what a reasonable person would have done, he clearly wasn’t reasonable which should tell you he had a different motive.
I see them being found not guilty and a shit storm to follow. I don’t believe they’re guilty of murder based on the fact that the dead guy started the fight, but they’re definitely guilty of picking a really stupid battle. One they should have handled much differently. They should have armed themselves and followed him and waited for uniformed officers to intervene, I don’t believe they had any intentions to use their firearms and that’s evident from the fact that the gun is never pointed until the fight starts, but they should have stayed in the fucking truck. Them getting out and merely holding a gun doesn’t give him the right to attack them though.