don't think anyone here is questioning the valor and sacrific of the men engaged in any war. applies to WWs,vietnam,1812,falklands,korea,punic,napoleonic,etc etc. the argument is about what they thought they were fighting for and what their rulers got them to think they were fighting for. yes,some wars are fully justified morally. the US has even been involved in a few. W1,WW2,vietnam and iraq are not among them.
every WW2 vet i have known,like my father, believed and did until their end that they were fighting for america,democracy and freedom.
many vietnam vets i know have come to believe that they were "brain washed" into believing those same things. most have let it go,many are still angry about it and being dumped and shit on when it ended.
fighting euopean WW2? allies,are you kidding? stalin and churchill manipulated the US into war to preserve their respective empires. france? what good has it done america after the 18th century? we paid them back with 116,00 deaths in '17/18. in payment they drug us into SE asia.
there is zero chance hitler and mussolini could have been any danger to us in west.hemis. they couldn't build "the bomb" and couldn't make a bomber capable of even bombing western UK. yea,sunk some ships off tampa and lost a bunch of subs doing it. their naval incompetence was a game loser for them. 80% of german combat deaths were in the east. that was never gonna improve and leave them any spares for other adventures.
fighting WW2 in asia has a different story. was about territory,markets and resources. we had the resources,didn't need the territory (and markets?). japs grabbed resources and territory in asia and were dying by the thousands to grab markets in china. a lot of jap hate and china love here because of our wonderful christian converting freaks. kinda like in peru,mexico and so. pacific.