southfront.org
Probably should name this something else, like dumpster fire. It's seems if it states Ukraine it will be lock. Also, might keep the Ranger away if he doesn't see Ukraine.
If Ukraine had not given up the nuclear capability they inherited they would not be in this particular mess today.
I was listening to Savage today and he had a guest on that stated Soros had a hand in some of the color revolutions that happened in Ukraine as well.
As defined by the CIA and NOT any of us or even most politicians for that matter.
The sad part - there's still people that believe that bs..
Fuuuuuuck.. Same old mainstream talking points (on one hand part). Do we really have to go over it again?
Yes, please do. The “pros” I listed for helping Ukraine may or may not be talking points, I don’t really care. They are true. We absolutely promised to protect Ukraine from Russia in exchange for giving up nukes. The war has undeniably shown Russia to be much weaker than thought. I’m sure China loves depending on weak allies, and in the middle are normal nobody Ukrainians dying for freedom from Russia.
What makes you think that would stop these crooked shits from sending money over there to be laundered? Hell it would probably increase. You know, need to fund the rebuild and all.
What makes you think Russia aint holding back big time in order to be prepared for possible/inevitable war with us?
What makes you think Russia is weak? They are destroying a large Nato backed and trained military with a fraction of the budget. They are killing Ukrainian adversaries at an estimated ratio of 8-1 without mass civilian casualties. I’m not a military expert obviously but this seems substantial.
General McGregor claims Ukraine lost 4,000 men and hundreds of vehicles including tanks to Russias 160 men during these “probing attacks”.looks like even zelensky supporters not happy about it....
www.businessinsider.com
A buddy of mine retired from the army in 2014, but did years as a battery commander for field artillery. In conversations he told me that current military thinking is that artillery is antiquated, but he still contends that artillery won wars in the past, and is still necessary to win wars today, despite "advanced tech." However, not as much funding and resources are devoted to it in U.S. military today, because "antiquated." He also told me that the Russians never gave up on the idea of the importance of artillery, and devote much training and funding to keep their artillery strong and supplied and that their artillery outmatches anyone in the world, including the U.S. Over the course of the Ukraine war, he has not been surprised how effective it has proved to be.
The secrets of Russia's artillery war in Ukraine
The "generally mediocre performance" of Russian troops is being offset by massed artillery to support a slow, methodical advance, a new report says.
This article is almost a year old but I remember in the old Ukraine thread a discussion regarding Russias heavy use of artillery and how it seemed antiquated but yet effective against more “high tech“ NATO/US backed Ukraine.
supposedly, the russians are firing 10 rounds for every 1 from the ukranian side, or something terrible like that.The secrets of Russia's artillery war in Ukraine
The "generally mediocre performance" of Russian troops is being offset by massed artillery to support a slow, methodical advance, a new report says.
This article is almost a year old but I remember in the old Ukraine thread a discussion regarding Russias heavy use of artillery and how it seemed antiquated but yet effective against more “high tech“ NATO/US backed Ukraine.
there's a reason we call it the "king of battle" and the Russians called it "the God of War"
Of course an army on the defense would never flood their territory...
If you read Hubert Meyers books about the 12th SS in Normandy it quickly becomes apparent that any use of tanks resulted in damage or destruction by allied artillery, loses to aircraft or allied tanks were comparatively rare.
