The governor, in respect to the people, has powers, but no rights.
If you’re going to argue about the proper role of .gov in containing the virus, at least know the rules of play.
People always have rights in respect to any government. States have powers in respect to the people, and rights as the people’s representatives in respect to the federal government. The federal government only has rights in respect to other countries, and limited powers delegated from the states, or from the people.
Therefore, the governor can’t claim the “right to” anything in respect to the people. It’s like the dog taking the master for a walk.
Easy, no?
If you’re going to argue about the proper role of .gov in containing the virus, at least know the rules of play.
People always have rights in respect to any government. States have powers in respect to the people, and rights as the people’s representatives in respect to the federal government. The federal government only has rights in respect to other countries, and limited powers delegated from the states, or from the people.
Therefore, the governor can’t claim the “right to” anything in respect to the people. It’s like the dog taking the master for a walk.
Easy, no?
I think in an emergency, the Governor has the right to seal the state's borders.
Although I didn't stay at a Holiday Inn last night
Last edited: