While i'm by no means new to shooting, in the last few years i've broadened my interest and research into the more detailed aspects of the sport...equipment and the function of what's actually going on durring the shot have taken on a whole new role into my thought process. This can be a blessing and burden of course but i think the rewards and knowledge have added a lot to my learning curve.
I've grown up doing a lot shooting and hunting but even with the great amount of outside instruction, most of hands-on improvements come through my own trial and error experience (with a ton of reading/listening to others as a part of it)... But that is exactly why i could use some advice from others on this matter.
None of my optics of cheap but then again a good $500 scope to me, probably wouldn't be considered even close to adequate by professionals and serious benchrest shooters.
What i'm wondering is what are your steps to ensure that parallax is taken out of the equation(as much as possible)?
While i've been trying to read up on and considering this for awhile...there are two rifles/scopes that have made me want to take a serious look at and seek advice for this question...
First, a Millet TRS-1 that i got for the eventually purchase of my range gun(rem700sps-t .308 that i now have) which i mounted on a .270 for deer season last fall. Not an overly expensive scope in the scheme of things, but lots of options and i thought a good starter.
I was at the range sighting it in on a lead-sled before deer season and everthing went fine...had it dialed in at 2 1/2" high at 100. Afterwards though, i put it on a bag for a few shots and my 2 1/2" high group turned into close to 5" high!! ...because of the tendency to not position yourself normally durring the shot i don't like to use the sled anymore at all.
Second, i have a S&W M&P 15-22(.22LR) with a decent simmons 2.8-12 on it. Because of the zero drop AR stock, i had to get extra high rings for it and have not been happy with the off-bore sight axis POA for the .22 trajectory... But back to the point, tonight when shooting at 70 yds with CCI Green Tag, i noticed that i would shoot one 5 shot group fine...reload, and then my next group in sometimes was close to an inch higher/lower...and i was shooting 1-2" groups so it was very noticeable. This is the affect of parallax correct? (i can see the cross hairs move up and down when moving my head) It seemed that i had to have my eye very close to the scope to eliminate this.
Anyways just wanted to explain 2 of the instances that have me wanting to seek advice on the question...
I know the quality of the scope plays a large part in this, but am interested and seeing what tips/advice you guys of for eliminating the parallax when you shoot! ...As well as how you decide what the propper eye relief for your scope should be when setting up your rifle. I find myself tending to like to be as close to the scope as possible but if your eye moves closer than the point where the complete "circle"/view is reached, can this also create the same problems as being too far?
Would really appreciate some advice on this, thanks for help you can give me!
Btw, what are your thoughts on how important the optic design in this matter? i.e. Focal plane posistion as discussed in this link:
http://www.6mmbr.com/parallax.html
I've grown up doing a lot shooting and hunting but even with the great amount of outside instruction, most of hands-on improvements come through my own trial and error experience (with a ton of reading/listening to others as a part of it)... But that is exactly why i could use some advice from others on this matter.
None of my optics of cheap but then again a good $500 scope to me, probably wouldn't be considered even close to adequate by professionals and serious benchrest shooters.
What i'm wondering is what are your steps to ensure that parallax is taken out of the equation(as much as possible)?
While i've been trying to read up on and considering this for awhile...there are two rifles/scopes that have made me want to take a serious look at and seek advice for this question...
First, a Millet TRS-1 that i got for the eventually purchase of my range gun(rem700sps-t .308 that i now have) which i mounted on a .270 for deer season last fall. Not an overly expensive scope in the scheme of things, but lots of options and i thought a good starter.
I was at the range sighting it in on a lead-sled before deer season and everthing went fine...had it dialed in at 2 1/2" high at 100. Afterwards though, i put it on a bag for a few shots and my 2 1/2" high group turned into close to 5" high!! ...because of the tendency to not position yourself normally durring the shot i don't like to use the sled anymore at all.
Second, i have a S&W M&P 15-22(.22LR) with a decent simmons 2.8-12 on it. Because of the zero drop AR stock, i had to get extra high rings for it and have not been happy with the off-bore sight axis POA for the .22 trajectory... But back to the point, tonight when shooting at 70 yds with CCI Green Tag, i noticed that i would shoot one 5 shot group fine...reload, and then my next group in sometimes was close to an inch higher/lower...and i was shooting 1-2" groups so it was very noticeable. This is the affect of parallax correct? (i can see the cross hairs move up and down when moving my head) It seemed that i had to have my eye very close to the scope to eliminate this.
Anyways just wanted to explain 2 of the instances that have me wanting to seek advice on the question...
I know the quality of the scope plays a large part in this, but am interested and seeing what tips/advice you guys of for eliminating the parallax when you shoot! ...As well as how you decide what the propper eye relief for your scope should be when setting up your rifle. I find myself tending to like to be as close to the scope as possible but if your eye moves closer than the point where the complete "circle"/view is reached, can this also create the same problems as being too far?
Would really appreciate some advice on this, thanks for help you can give me!
Btw, what are your thoughts on how important the optic design in this matter? i.e. Focal plane posistion as discussed in this link:
http://www.6mmbr.com/parallax.html