That is their recommendation for a ZCO scope only.
I'm assuming they'll update the manual since it says follow ring manufacturers recommendations.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is their recommendation for a ZCO scope only.
No kidding, why would ZCO make a comment about any other optics manufacturer.That is their recommendation for a ZCO scope only.
He was making a clarifying point about Mr. Gofer’s statement, which could be read as a sweeping generalization.No kidding, why would ZCO make a comment about any other optics manufacturer.
Anything that requires 55 inch pounds to hold an optic is poorly designed.
We have decades of rings and mounts that work already that require far less force, don’t have to be a rocket scientistDo show us your qualifications to make that statement
Do show us your qualifications to make that statement
We have decades of rings and mounts that work already that require far less force, don’t have to be a rocket scientist
Wutthere few members selling the arc ring since last week. No buyer yet.
We have decades of rings and mounts that work already that require far less force, don’t have to be a rocket scientist
ExceptI think the OP is full of and wanted some attention
You are right that 55 lbs is the correct torque for the rail screws. It's also the correct torque for the ring clamp screws.View attachment 7791188
to me the instructions read tighten rail clamp screws to 55. In the photo it clearly shows the rail clamp screws are the bottom ones.
I will admit I could be wrong be cause I do not own a set and I am not positive.
You are right that 55 lbs is the correct torque for the rail screws. It's also the correct torque for the ring clamp screws.
That's because he wanted to eliminate the rings as a possible cause in the discussion. Unfortunately he failed.Any one else notice he name dropped the ARC rings but was sooo careful not to name the scope make? Like dude just post a picture already.
You are like, I don't know... three days and a dead horse late on that revelation. Thanks.That's because he wanted to eliminate the rings as a possible cause in the discussion. Unfortunately he failed.
Yep I stated a few post later I was wrong.You are right that 55 lbs is the correct torque for the rail screws. It's also the correct torque for the ring clamp screws.
So I uploaded a good crisp photo showing the 55in-lb on the rings. Sadly the forum smudged and down rezed it to garbage.
Any how, any machinest or engineer knows that smaller screws with finer threads generate more clamping force for the same torque than bigger screws with coarser threads. Ted uses one bigger stronger screw. He provides the correct torque to properly torque the scope.
I always lapped my rings, but I just recently got my first spuhr and I was not gonna lap it. I thought about just doing it but didn’t.I always use Kokopelli lapping kit before mounting. Regardless of who makes the rings. Spuhr mount being exception.
Yeah. I was just kidding. I believe he said he used one of the torque kitsOriginally he stated the rear ocular lens was cracked and that really cannot happen by ring torque.
Spuhr mounts are line bored, so you don't need to, nor should you lap them. Lapping was intended generally for individual ring sets/pairs where there coud be dimensional variations on the rings and/or the rail that they were mounted to.I always lapped my rings, but I just recently got my first spuhr and I was not gonna lap it. I thought about just doing it but didn’t.
Don’t see people owning Spuhrs having these troubles?In other words, you're an ignorant idiot who can't back up your statements
Anyway it doesn’t matter, as long as you are happy with what you’ve got. I don’t want a mount that looks like a door hinge and a door knob had a baby with a river boat. But that’s just me.In other words, you're an ignorant idiot who can't back up your statements
People love to overtighten and break shit, it’s just about their favourite thing. 55 inch pounds is retarted and the rings are hideous.
Plenty of issues with Sphur and zero shifting. I sold my QDP for a ARC M-Brace and guess what ? I torqued a Razor Gen 2 at 55in/lbs as per the rings manufacturer as opposed to Vortex’s 18in/lbs recommendation. Shot 300 rounds since I swapped mounts, did a drop test and bang the rifle around. Still doing fine so far. You’ll be the first to know if the razor needs to go to vortex service.Don’t see people owning Spuhrs having these troubles?
A whole 300 rounds, wow!! Can you tell us more?! How did you do that?Plenty of issues with Sphur and zero shifting. I sold my QDP for a ARC M-Brace and guess what ? I torqued a Razor Gen 2 at 55in/lbs as per the rings manufacturer as opposed to Vortex’s 18in/lbs recommendation. Shot 300 rounds since I swapped mounts, did a drop test and bang the rifle around. Still doing fine so far. You’ll be the first to know if the razor needs to go to vortex service.
That’s top secret...A whole 300 rounds, wow!! Can you tell us more?! How did you do that?
Where?Since this thread is still going for no reason, here's a photo on my dry aged ribeye I had for supper topped with a nice truffle butter, paired with a smoked añejo old fashioned.
View attachment 7796246
And mofo…you didn’t invite me? Was’ up wid dat shit? LolSince this thread is still going for no reason, here's a photo on my dry aged ribeye I had for supper topped with a nice truffle butter, paired with a smoked añejo old fashioned.
View attachment 7796246
How many inch pounds on those steak markers?Since this thread is still going for no reason, here's a photo on my dry aged ribeye I had for supper topped with a nice truffle butter, paired with a smoked añejo old fashioned.
View attachment 7796246
Don’t see people owning Spuhrs having these troubles?
Charlie's Steakhouse in TampaWhere?
Sorry man! I will say tho, it was one of the best steaks I've had. Almost went Grade 9 Wagyu but decided to save that for another timeAnd mofo…you didn’t invite me? Was’ up wid dat shit? Lol
That’s my kind of meal. Beautiful, my friend.
Approx 26.3in-lbs per markerH
How many inch pounds on those steak markers?
This is a meat nerd thread now.Since this thread is still going for no reason, here's a photo on my dry aged ribeye I had for supper topped with a nice truffle butter, paired with a smoked añejo old fashioned.
View attachment 7796246
What’s the identifiable chararticstic of the parallax binding? Does the lenses not move when the parallax is adjusted? Curious since I’ve used probably around 10+ Spuhr mounts and never had an issue with using 25inlbs on the caps. Vortex and NF scopes though.Again, there's an entire thread of people having issues with Spuhrs binding parallax on multiple scope brands at low torque values.