New member but I have been reading a lot on optics here and i keep getting more confused so i registered today to post a few questions. Hopefully wont get the generic "use the search feature!" responses.
Rifle:self built
AR10 platform.
Si defense gen III matched upper and lower
DPMS SASS 18" fluted barrel
Failzero bolt carrier
daniel defense 12" lite rail.
magpul prs stock
DPMS lower parts kit.
Still waiting on a few pieces ie. waiting on ATF for yhm supressor paperwork.
atlas bi pod. etc.
Anyhow those are a few specifics on the weapon. I intend to use it for deer hunting, and shooting at the range mainly to learn how to shoot at longer distances. Basically all around rifle and i want to use it to learn how to use mil dot as well. I always looked up to our snipers in Iraq but never got the chance to tap into their vast knowledge due to the fact I wasnt an 03'. I dont plan on being a professional sniper but i would like to know the basics.
So im here getting more and more confused as to what scope to get. I have been doing a lot of reading on a daily basis on here. So far I have just came to the conclusion i should buy a cheaper scope and learn to use it and then advance to a better scope. I really dont want to have too much scope for my weapon as I dont intend to make 1000 yard shot on a regular basis and i dont have the knowledge to do so. I would like to learn how to one day and woukd like a scope that would make that a possibility. I was really leaning to the Nightforce NXS 3.5-15x50 but i think that will be a bit too much scope for the capabilities of the rifle. Then decided I would try a uso SN3 1.8-10 but talked myself out of it completely as I wanted a larger objective...So i decided i would buy a cheaper mil dot scope to learn with and then pass that scope on to my m4. Now i dont know what to choose.
I guess my question would be what everyone else who has experience would buy starting out. I can afford up to 2500.00 not including mounts but would prefer to stay below 2000.00 I would love the schmidt and bender scope Marine snipers have but cant justify 3k+ and my skills with probably will never progress to the point of needing such a scope.
So far with what I have learned is that I woukd like a scope with ffp reticle,illuminated reticle,mil dot, parallax adjustment, variable power, objective >40mm, dont think i will need more zoom than say 10x. It needs to be something i can learn with and maybe a bit forgiving (zero stop?) Everyone I know is diehard leupold and im tired of hearing about it. Im going to look at Nikon today after work and see. I really dont like to buy anything i can put my hands on first.
I have looked at cheaper alternatives as well...but still not sure what features I can live with and the ones i cant. A lot of people tell me glass quality is what you want in a scope but it seems to me that it gets to the point of diminishing returns as far as quality per dollar in my price range. I dont live in a major city or anything and I dont have internet at home right now as sat dish is out of alignment ever since my dog jumped on it going afer the ball so my research time is limited to lunch break at work or from my phone right now.
Does anyone have or use a nikon 2.5-10x44 tactical? Im thinking that might be a good option as well as (as much as i hate to say it!) LEUPOLD MK 4 3.5-10X40 LR/T but unclear as to why the ffp version doesnt have illuminated reticle.
Maybe im asking too much for the money.
Any help would be greatly appreciated, as well as any smart remarks. ie. "use the search feature!", "oh god im going to kill myself/you if someone asks another newb question!", "keep doing research!", "I know the answer but Im not telling you because you havent read enough on here!" I can handle critics too.
Rifle:self built
AR10 platform.
Si defense gen III matched upper and lower
DPMS SASS 18" fluted barrel
Failzero bolt carrier
daniel defense 12" lite rail.
magpul prs stock
DPMS lower parts kit.
Still waiting on a few pieces ie. waiting on ATF for yhm supressor paperwork.
atlas bi pod. etc.
Anyhow those are a few specifics on the weapon. I intend to use it for deer hunting, and shooting at the range mainly to learn how to shoot at longer distances. Basically all around rifle and i want to use it to learn how to use mil dot as well. I always looked up to our snipers in Iraq but never got the chance to tap into their vast knowledge due to the fact I wasnt an 03'. I dont plan on being a professional sniper but i would like to know the basics.
So im here getting more and more confused as to what scope to get. I have been doing a lot of reading on a daily basis on here. So far I have just came to the conclusion i should buy a cheaper scope and learn to use it and then advance to a better scope. I really dont want to have too much scope for my weapon as I dont intend to make 1000 yard shot on a regular basis and i dont have the knowledge to do so. I would like to learn how to one day and woukd like a scope that would make that a possibility. I was really leaning to the Nightforce NXS 3.5-15x50 but i think that will be a bit too much scope for the capabilities of the rifle. Then decided I would try a uso SN3 1.8-10 but talked myself out of it completely as I wanted a larger objective...So i decided i would buy a cheaper mil dot scope to learn with and then pass that scope on to my m4. Now i dont know what to choose.
I guess my question would be what everyone else who has experience would buy starting out. I can afford up to 2500.00 not including mounts but would prefer to stay below 2000.00 I would love the schmidt and bender scope Marine snipers have but cant justify 3k+ and my skills with probably will never progress to the point of needing such a scope.
So far with what I have learned is that I woukd like a scope with ffp reticle,illuminated reticle,mil dot, parallax adjustment, variable power, objective >40mm, dont think i will need more zoom than say 10x. It needs to be something i can learn with and maybe a bit forgiving (zero stop?) Everyone I know is diehard leupold and im tired of hearing about it. Im going to look at Nikon today after work and see. I really dont like to buy anything i can put my hands on first.
I have looked at cheaper alternatives as well...but still not sure what features I can live with and the ones i cant. A lot of people tell me glass quality is what you want in a scope but it seems to me that it gets to the point of diminishing returns as far as quality per dollar in my price range. I dont live in a major city or anything and I dont have internet at home right now as sat dish is out of alignment ever since my dog jumped on it going afer the ball so my research time is limited to lunch break at work or from my phone right now.
Does anyone have or use a nikon 2.5-10x44 tactical? Im thinking that might be a good option as well as (as much as i hate to say it!) LEUPOLD MK 4 3.5-10X40 LR/T but unclear as to why the ffp version doesnt have illuminated reticle.
Maybe im asking too much for the money.
Any help would be greatly appreciated, as well as any smart remarks. ie. "use the search feature!", "oh god im going to kill myself/you if someone asks another newb question!", "keep doing research!", "I know the answer but Im not telling you because you havent read enough on here!" I can handle critics too.