-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
Tucker Carlson: Bret Weinstein explains how the COVID-19 Vaccine kills
- Thread starter theLBC
- Start date
And yes, you should take some time to watch this.
Yes you should. The only thing he leaves out is they HAD to keep the ruse going through the election and beyond to accomplish the steal and the cover.
Last edited:
Supporting evidence re-post for those who might have missed it.
Jump to the charts were spikes in all cause mortality rates are lined up to roll out of the..
Jump to the charts were spikes in all cause mortality rates are lined up to roll out of the..
Bret is sharp as F.
Watch and listen to a lot of his interviews on lunch breaks at my desk.
.
I just wish folks would go back to actually writing these things out so we don't have to listen to folks droning on and on on.
But I guess reading is something most don't want to do these days.
But I guess reading is something most don't want to do these days.
A 5 minute article would be so much easier for most of this shit.
Cliff notes for you..
""Major world powers, new and old, also face a novel reality: while the lethality of their military might be greater than ever, their capacity to impose control over the politically awakened masses of the world is at a historic low. To put it bluntly: in earlier times, it was easier to control one million people than to physically kill one million people; today, it is infinitely easier to kill one million people than to control one million people.""
Zbigniew Brzezinski - Speech, Chatham House, London, November 17, 2008
His history and the "challenges" he faced while at evergreen state college (olympia, warshington, EXTREMELY liberal school) are very interesting. I remember reading about evergreen's dust ups with him in the local rags (western warshington), but didn't really follow it closely. He was treated very poorly by all the liberal dicks, both the student body and the faculty.
I'm glad to see he's come out the other side and appears to be doing well. I witnessed a similar situation in the late 70's when I was a student (at a different school) and the other students in my class were ganging up on our professor. The other students tried to coerce me into joining the dogpile. I told them to fuck off, I was there for an education, I was paying for it, they were interfering with it and I suggested they simply focus on their's. Seemed it was more important for them to try and take down an excellent professor whose world views they did not agree with. It was a real eye opener, first time I had ever witnessed a pack of liberal jackals in action.
I've come to like him quite a bit. When he speaks, I hear some "humbleness" (humility), intelligence, down to earth approach to things and compassion.
Yes, this is worth the watch. Oh, and kudos to Tucker for not being a "Hannity". He asks a question, then shuts up. Quite refreshing.
Last edited:
I bet he doesn't know he's about to commit suicide. Two to the back of the head.
All I saw was
(1) People lie with statistics
(2) The vax was largely ineffective. (ok totally inefffective)
(3) The rest of you are fooled by charts.
Extraordinary Claims require extraordinary proof.
You may commence dogpile.
(1) People lie with statistics
(2) The vax was largely ineffective. (ok totally inefffective)
(3) The rest of you are fooled by charts.
Extraordinary Claims require extraordinary proof.
You may commence dogpile.
Post #13, snarky comment concerning how I approached this thread creation.
(reply and quote not linking)
Attachments
damn,thought i was the only one who hated getting most all this worthwhile (IMHO) content being delivered in "videos". i haven't "watched TV" in > 30 years. haven't missed shit. but,as said,reading seems to be a big challenge for many.in
Last edited:
i sort of assumed most people prefer something they can watch without leaving the website, and then they can click the link or search for details if they wanted to read more. for example, the russell brand post from x links to this.
Pfizer Makes $43 Billion Bet That ‘Turbo Cancers’ Are Going To Explode Around The World
Pfizer has stunned the medical world, completing the $43 billion acquisition of Seagen, a small drug company that treats turbo cancers and barely make
i will try to provide both if possible.
I agree. Seems every video drones on and on where a few simple sentences would suffice.
Paid by the word. Some of the stories I read say exactly the same thing, in slightly different words, 4-5 even 6 times.
Agreed. Cliff notes for those of us that don’t want to waste an hour. I seen the cliff notes above but it still didn’t exactly tell is how it kills people, which is what the video is supposed to be about. So can anyone concisely explain what exactly it does?
Oh, you must be referring to youtube videos that have, at best, 3 minutes of content that they stretch out to 18 or 20 minutes.
Don't have time for that shit........
As horrible as some people's grammar and punctuation is online, I'm not surprised they would rather watch a video. They probably can't read worth a shit.
As it is, it probably takes them two hours to watch 60 Minutes.
I've always been an avid reader. I suppose I'm finally getting used to the butchery of the English language I see every day surfing the web.
As it is, it probably takes them two hours to watch 60 Minutes.
I've always been an avid reader. I suppose I'm finally getting used to the butchery of the English language I see every day surfing the web.
The notes I wrote above only pertain to the motive of why something like this would be deliberately used against the common man world wide.
Cliff notes directly from the video goes something more like.. A minority group of specialists in science and medicine dissented from the mainstream narrative to evidence this "pandemic" was purposely managed to injure and kill.
The video walks through some of the evidence. Then goes on to explain that the WHO plans to do it again. And is currently positioning with nation states to silence any dissenters during round two whatever that might be.
Did they say anything specific about how the vaccine kills? We all know the pandemic was engineered.
Primarily injures the heart and causes turbo cancers in some. Longer term effects are still unknown. Nothing new except now we are hearing the same from respected experts in their fields.
It's rarer on this forum someone calls out a video that is a must watch. This one is worth it only if the take away is to realize you are being lied to and targeted.
It's rarer on this forum someone calls out a video that is a must watch. This one is worth it only if the take away is to realize you are being lied to and targeted.
He discusses that about 27 minutes in. In my simpleton, non scientific mind, that was my biggest concern from the get go with the whole vaccine thing. I knew that most vaccines took years to develop and test, but people were so anxious to "get back to normal" that the "vaccine" rollout was at light speed compared to past vaccines. Then when the shots came out and the experts were all touting its long term effectiveness I was thinking how the hell could you know the long term effectiveness in the absence of time itself? It made zero sense.
Then when the stats from the pharma companies started floating around that it was 98-99 percent effective I knew for sure the whole thing was fucked. In the span of 3 years the vaccine has gone from 99 percent effective against getting and spreading Covid to "it may help keep you out of the hospital....maybe." What amazes me is that almost no one talks about that. And that people just kind of have an "oh well" attitude about it. My daughter is 10 and we did not want her to get the Covid vaccines. My wife and I both go it, as did my daughter. She has had worse colds. She does however, have an incredible number of friends that are sick virtually all the time. I can't help but think there is a direct correlation there. I just pray that her friends don't end up with more serious issues down the road.
I offer the following interpretation with the caveat that I'm not a scientist or a physician, so I may have paraphrased Wienstein's argument incompletely or incorrectly.
If you listen closely to the parts of the conversation that begin at 8:30, 10:30, 16:30 and 20:05 you will get some of the major points Weinstein trys to make. He asserts that when the mRNA chemical comes into contact with any of your body's cells, it forces those cells to produce proteins that your immune system sees as foreign and will naturally regard those cells as being infected with a virus. Your immune system will then destroy those cells. If this occurs in most muscle cells or other cells that you can lose without threat to your long-term health, the harm is probably minimal. However, when the cells being attacked by your immune system are in your heart they can't be replaced due to the unusual nature of heart tissue. Instead, the damage will result in scarring and loss of function in the heart muscle. There is a period of time soon after the damage occurs when your heart is especially vulnerable to failure and the probability of failure is increased if you push your now-damaged heart to perform at a level that it can no longer accommodate. That's why you are seeing so many reports of previously healthy athletes dropping dead on the field of play - their hearts have been damaged and are unable to keep up with the demands being placed on them even though the rest of the athlete's body may be perfectly capable of handling the exertion.
That provides an explanation for the increase in myocarditis and pericarditis among those who have taken the injection, and why this is especially insidious to young, otherwise healthy people who are naturally more likely to exercise at a level of intensity that can cause failure in their damaged heart muscles.
I haven't gotten to the part of the conversation where Weinstein talks about the increase in the cancer rate, but I'll try to add my interpretation of that argument after I watch the rest of the video.
-------------
Edit: Unfortunately after a brief mention, the conversation never got back to explaining the possible link to cancers and the covid vaccine. Weinstein did point out that one study estimated that worldwide covid vaccine-related fatalities due to adverse reactions to the drug is around 17 million.
Last edited:
An informative video for sure... To not believe the data & evidence showing the vax was more dangerous than the Wuhan virus- one's "suspension of disbelief" would have to be stuck at max.
This, but missing one main point. That the WHO Pandemic Accord that is to be voted on by nations in May, 2024 is a pathway to upend the Constitution and usher in totalitarism.
I have a lot of critiques about the mRNA vaccines and how we rolled them out. COVID policies in general.
I really respect Bret W., I think a lot of his concerns have merit behind them. But I'm far from convinced about a mass fatality like what he's proposing. Maybe he's right, but I don't the evidence supports his claims on that.
I really respect Bret W., I think a lot of his concerns have merit behind them. But I'm far from convinced about a mass fatality like what he's proposing. Maybe he's right, but I don't the evidence supports his claims on that.
I don't see how that would legally supercede the constitution.
Other countries without a constitution and BOR may be fucked though, but that's on them.
Being that the public was the clinical trials, you can bet there were placebos and rather hot lots of the vax. Only big pharma knows the count.
Might not see as much mass fatalities as the number of total vax doses out there, but the hot lots would certainly have a greater percentage of putting more people in the dirt.
We already live in a country in which the Patriot Act allows govt to bypass the Constitution and violate citizens rights at their whim. How many other incidents in which the Constitution is violated do we witness all of the time?
Similar threads
