I am not any sort of famous, and no thanks.
In all the time I have been reviewing optics, there have been very few cases when someone tried to bribe me into giving a good review. Val was one of those and that is when I stopped talking to him. Then, I ran into an issue that if I got a scope to look at directly from Val, it often looked different than a scope sourced from somewhere else.
You see where I am going with this, right?
Why should I spend any more time on Val or IOR?
I get hit up with requests to review IOR or Valdada frequently which is mostly a testament of the reach that T-Rex has on Youtube. That itself is a testament to the fact that you do not need to know anything about scopes to sound like an authority on Youtube.
I have no insight whether IOR got better over the years, but given the sordid history it would take me a lot of time and effort to procure a sufficient number of scopes, test them and come up with an accurate assessment.
Given how many reputable brands exist now, why would I want to do that?
ILya