Re: Velocity goal for reliable 1000+ yard shooting?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ChrisGarrett</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SniperUncle</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I found a load on ammoguide, that in a 20" barrel should yield 2873FPS muzzle vel, on a 155gr Sierra Match King bullet. It yields 1190FPS at 1000yds.
Compare this to another load from ammoguide, in a 20" barrel, that yields 2741FPS Muzzle vel, on a 175gr Sierra Match King bullet. It yields 1248FPS at 1000yds.
Based on these numbers, I would lean towards trying to get a higher velocity accurate load on the 175 or 178 grain bullets, as the carry through will be better at the 1000yds range. There are several powders that you could research to get a higher velocity with the 175/178's and a 20" barrel. Do some ladders tests to find the better accuracy points, and then work up from one of the higher velocity nodes.
Heavier bullets retain better velocity, and are less susceptible to windage.
Just my $.02 </div></div>
Those quoted loads are a bit optimistic in the real world.
Getting a 155gr HPBT up to 2873 fps out of a 20" bore is going to be somewhat problematic and hard on your brass. Same with a 175gr travelling at 2741 fps.
Chris
</div></div> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ChrisGarrett</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SniperUncle</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I found a load on ammoguide, that in a 20" barrel should yield 2873FPS muzzle vel, on a 155gr Sierra Match King bullet. It yields 1190FPS at 1000yds.
Compare this to another load from ammoguide, in a 20" barrel, that yields 2741FPS Muzzle vel, on a 175gr Sierra Match King bullet. It yields 1248FPS at 1000yds.
Based on these numbers, I would lean towards trying to get a higher velocity accurate load on the 175 or 178 grain bullets, as the carry through will be better at the 1000yds range. There are several powders that you could research to get a higher velocity with the 175/178's and a 20" barrel. Do some ladders tests to find the better accuracy points, and then work up from one of the higher velocity nodes.
Heavier bullets retain better velocity, and are less susceptible to windage.
Just my $.02 </div></div>
Those quoted loads are a bit optimistic in the real world.
Getting a 155gr HPBT up to 2873 fps out of a 20" bore is going to be somewhat problematic and hard on your brass. Same with a 175gr travelling at 2741 fps.
Chris
</div></div> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ChrisGarrett</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SniperUncle</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I found a load on ammoguide, that in a 20" barrel should yield 2873FPS muzzle vel, on a 155gr Sierra Match King bullet. It yields 1190FPS at 1000yds.
Compare this to another load from ammoguide, in a 20" barrel, that yields 2741FPS Muzzle vel, on a 175gr Sierra Match King bullet. It yields 1248FPS at 1000yds.
Based on these numbers, I would lean towards trying to get a higher velocity accurate load on the 175 or 178 grain bullets, as the carry through will be better at the 1000yds range. There are several powders that you could research to get a higher velocity with the 175/178's and a 20" barrel. Do some ladders tests to find the better accuracy points, and then work up from one of the higher velocity nodes.
Heavier bullets retain better velocity, and are less susceptible to windage.
Just my $.02 </div></div>
Those quoted loads are a bit optimistic in the real world.
Getting a 155gr HPBT up to 2873 fps out of a 20" bore is going to be somewhat problematic and hard on your brass. Same with a 175gr travelling at 2741 fps.
Chris
</div></div>
Yes, Chris, like I said, these are from that website. I'm sure they are rather optimistic. My point was more to see the retained velocity of the heavier bullet versus the lighter one at 1000 yards. I believe the point is to try to get a load that remains supersonic to 1000 yards rather than dropping into the transonic range. As one could see from the example, the heavier bullet has much more speed retained, and thus, realistically a better chance of remaining supersonic under real world scenarios.
Thanks for the input, though, we do need to try to stay realistic.